Difference between revisions of "Berothai"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
Line 1: Line 1:
== Fausset's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_34810" /> ==
== Fausset's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_34810" /> ==
<p> [[Berothai]] or [[Berothah.]] In &nbsp;Ezekiel 47:16 connected with [[Hamath]] and Damascus, as the northern boundary of the future inheritance of restored Israel. In &nbsp;2 Samuel 8:8 a city of Zobah, taken by David from Hadadezer. Possibly identical with Berytus, now the commercial mart Beirut, called from the wells, Beeroth, still seen, bored in the rocks at Beirut. In the parallel (&nbsp;1 Chronicles 18:8) "Chun" is substituted. Near Beyrut are [[Assyrian]] tablets of a king (Shalmaneser), who overran Phoenicia. it is the traditional scene of the combat of Saint [[George]] and the dragon. </p>
<p> [[Berothai]] or BEROTHAH. In &nbsp;Ezekiel 47:16 connected with [[Hamath]] and Damascus, as the northern boundary of the future inheritance of restored Israel. In &nbsp;2 Samuel 8:8 a city of Zobah, taken by David from Hadadezer. Possibly identical with Berytus, now the commercial mart Beirut, called from the wells, Beeroth, still seen, bored in the rocks at Beirut. In the parallel (&nbsp;1 Chronicles 18:8) "Chun" is substituted. Near Beyrut are [[Assyrian]] tablets of a king (Shalmaneser), who overran Phoenicia. it is the traditional scene of the combat of Saint [[George]] and the dragon. </p>
          
          
== Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_65224" /> ==
== Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_65224" /> ==
<p> City belonging to [[Hadadezer]] king of Zobah. &nbsp;2 Samuel 8:8 . Apparently the same as [[Chun]] in &nbsp;1 Chronicles 18:8 . </p>
<p> City belonging to [[Hadadezer]] king of Zobah. &nbsp;2 Samuel 8:8 . Apparently the same as CHUN in &nbsp;1 Chronicles 18:8 . </p>
          
          
== Holman Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_39090" /> ==
== Holman Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_39090" /> ==
Line 9: Line 9:
          
          
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_24951" /> ==
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_24951" /> ==
<p> (Heb. Berothay', בֵּרֹתִי, ''my wells;'' Sept. αἱ ἐκλεκταὶ πόλες; Vulg. ''Beroth'' )''.'' The first of these two names, each of which occurs once only, is given by Ezekiel (&nbsp;Ezekiel 47:16), in connection with Hamath and Damascus, as forming part of the northern boundary of the promised land as restored in his vision. The second is mentioned (&nbsp;2 Samuel 8:8) as the name of a city of [[Zobah]] taken by David (from which he brought away great quantities of "brass" as spoil), also in connection with Hamath and Damascus. The slightness of these references makes it impossible to identify the names with any degree of probability, or even to decide whether they refer to the same locality or not (Hassel, Volst. Erdb. 13, 345). The well-known city Beirut [[(Berytus)]] naturally suggests itself as identical with one, at least, of the names; but in each instance the circumstances of the case seem to require a position farther east, since Ezekiel places [[Berothah]] between Hamath and Damascus, and David's war with the King of Zobah led him away from the sea-coast toward the [[Euphrates]] (&nbsp;2 Samuel 8:3). In the latter instance, the difficulty is increased by the [[Hebrew]] text reading in &nbsp;1 Chronicles 18:8, [[Chun]] (See [[Chun]]) (q.v.) instead of Berothai, and by the fact that both in Samuel and Chronicles the Greek translators, instead of giving a proper name, translate by the phrase "from the choice cities;" clearly showing that they read either the same text in each passage, or at least words which bore the same sense. Furst regards Berothah and Berothai as distinct places, and identifies the first with Berytus. Mislin (''Saints Lieux,'' 1, 244) derives the name from the wells (''Beeroth'' )'','' which are still to be seen bored in the solid rock at Beirut. Against this identification, however, there is this farther objection, that the proper boundaries of the tribes (q.v.) never extended so far north as [[Berytus]] (q.v.), nor did David ever molest the Phoenician sea-coast in his wars. Both Berothah and Berothai are therefore probably to be sought in the vicinity of the springs that form the source of the Nahr Hasbany, near the present Hasbeya. (See [[Hazar-Enan]]). </p>
<p> (Heb. Berothay', בֵּרֹתִי, ''My Wells;'' Sept. αἱ ἐκλεκταὶ πόλες; Vulg. [[Beroth]] )''.'' The first of these two names, each of which occurs once only, is given by Ezekiel (&nbsp;Ezekiel 47:16), in connection with Hamath and Damascus, as forming part of the northern boundary of the promised land as restored in his vision. The second is mentioned (&nbsp;2 Samuel 8:8) as the name of a city of [[Zobah]] taken by David (from which he brought away great quantities of "brass" as spoil), also in connection with Hamath and Damascus. The slightness of these references makes it impossible to identify the names with any degree of probability, or even to decide whether they refer to the same locality or not (Hassel, Volst. Erdb. 13, 345). The well-known city Beirut (BERYTUS) naturally suggests itself as identical with one, at least, of the names; but in each instance the circumstances of the case seem to require a position farther east, since Ezekiel places [[Berothah]] between Hamath and Damascus, and David's war with the King of Zobah led him away from the sea-coast toward the [[Euphrates]] (&nbsp;2 Samuel 8:3). In the latter instance, the difficulty is increased by the [[Hebrew]] text reading in &nbsp;1 Chronicles 18:8, CHUN (See [[Chun]]) (q.v.) instead of Berothai, and by the fact that both in Samuel and Chronicles the Greek translators, instead of giving a proper name, translate by the phrase "from the choice cities;" clearly showing that they read either the same text in each passage, or at least words which bore the same sense. Furst regards Berothah and Berothai as distinct places, and identifies the first with Berytus. Mislin (''Saints Lieux,'' 1, 244) derives the name from the wells ([[Beeroth]] )'','' which are still to be seen bored in the solid rock at Beirut. Against this identification, however, there is this farther objection, that the proper boundaries of the tribes (q.v.) never extended so far north as [[Berytus]] (q.v.), nor did David ever molest the Phoenician sea-coast in his wars. Both Berothah and Berothai are therefore probably to be sought in the vicinity of the springs that form the source of the Nahr Hasbany, near the present Hasbeya. (See [[Hazar-Enan]]). </p>
          
          
==References ==
==References ==

Revision as of 10:40, 13 October 2021

Fausset's Bible Dictionary [1]

Berothai or BEROTHAH. In  Ezekiel 47:16 connected with Hamath and Damascus, as the northern boundary of the future inheritance of restored Israel. In  2 Samuel 8:8 a city of Zobah, taken by David from Hadadezer. Possibly identical with Berytus, now the commercial mart Beirut, called from the wells, Beeroth, still seen, bored in the rocks at Beirut. In the parallel ( 1 Chronicles 18:8) "Chun" is substituted. Near Beyrut are Assyrian tablets of a king (Shalmaneser), who overran Phoenicia. it is the traditional scene of the combat of Saint George and the dragon.

Morrish Bible Dictionary [2]

City belonging to Hadadezer king of Zobah.  2 Samuel 8:8 . Apparently the same as CHUN in  1 Chronicles 18:8 .

Holman Bible Dictionary [3]

 2 Samuel 8:8 1 Chronicles 18:8Cun

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [4]

(Heb. Berothay', בֵּרֹתִי, My Wells; Sept. αἱ ἐκλεκταὶ πόλες; Vulg. Beroth ). The first of these two names, each of which occurs once only, is given by Ezekiel ( Ezekiel 47:16), in connection with Hamath and Damascus, as forming part of the northern boundary of the promised land as restored in his vision. The second is mentioned ( 2 Samuel 8:8) as the name of a city of Zobah taken by David (from which he brought away great quantities of "brass" as spoil), also in connection with Hamath and Damascus. The slightness of these references makes it impossible to identify the names with any degree of probability, or even to decide whether they refer to the same locality or not (Hassel, Volst. Erdb. 13, 345). The well-known city Beirut (BERYTUS) naturally suggests itself as identical with one, at least, of the names; but in each instance the circumstances of the case seem to require a position farther east, since Ezekiel places Berothah between Hamath and Damascus, and David's war with the King of Zobah led him away from the sea-coast toward the Euphrates ( 2 Samuel 8:3). In the latter instance, the difficulty is increased by the Hebrew text reading in  1 Chronicles 18:8, CHUN (See Chun) (q.v.) instead of Berothai, and by the fact that both in Samuel and Chronicles the Greek translators, instead of giving a proper name, translate by the phrase "from the choice cities;" clearly showing that they read either the same text in each passage, or at least words which bore the same sense. Furst regards Berothah and Berothai as distinct places, and identifies the first with Berytus. Mislin (Saints Lieux, 1, 244) derives the name from the wells (Beeroth ), which are still to be seen bored in the solid rock at Beirut. Against this identification, however, there is this farther objection, that the proper boundaries of the tribes (q.v.) never extended so far north as Berytus (q.v.), nor did David ever molest the Phoenician sea-coast in his wars. Both Berothah and Berothai are therefore probably to be sought in the vicinity of the springs that form the source of the Nahr Hasbany, near the present Hasbeya. (See Hazar-Enan).

References