Difference between revisions of "Love"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
Line 1: Line 1:
== Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament <ref name="term_56426" /> ==
<p> <b> 1. Linguistic usage. </b> -Two verbs are used by the NT to designate religious love-ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν. In the Septuaginta third term, ἐρᾶν, occurs, but only once <i> sensu bono </i> , viz. &nbsp;Proverbs 4:6 (love of wisdom), once in a neutral sense, viz. &nbsp;Esther 2:17 (the king loved Esther), everywhere else as a figure of idolatry or political theocratic unfaithfulness (&nbsp;Jeremiah 22:20; &nbsp;Jeremiah 22:22, &nbsp;Lamentations 1:19, &nbsp;Ezekiel 16:33; &nbsp;Ezekiel 16:36-37; &nbsp;Ezekiel 23:5; &nbsp;Ezekiel 23:9; &nbsp;Ezekiel 23:22, &nbsp;Hosea 2:7; &nbsp;Hosea 2:10; &nbsp;Hosea 2:12-13). That the NT does not employ ἐρᾶν at all is probably due to the sensual associations of the word. In regard to the difference between ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν the following should be noticed. The etymology of ἀγαπᾶν is uncertain, but it seems to be allied to roots expressing ‘admiration,’ ‘taking pride in,’ ‘taking pleasure in.’ This points to the conclusion that ἀγαπᾶν is the love of selection and complacency based on the perception of something in the object loved that attracts and pleases. This element of selective attachment shows itself in the fact that ἀγαπᾶν can mean ‘to be contented with,’ ‘to acquiesce in,’ ‘to put up with,’ and also in this, that ἀγαπᾶν is not used of the love of mere compassion. On the other hand, φιλεῖν seems to have as its fundamental root-meaning the intimacy of bodily touch, ‘fondling,’ ‘caressing,’ whence it can signify ‘to kiss’; it therefore denotes the love of close association in the habitual relations of life-love, between kindred, between husband and wife, between friends (&nbsp;Matthew 6:5; &nbsp;Matthew 10:37; &nbsp;Matthew 23:6, &nbsp;Luke 20:46, &nbsp;John 11:3; &nbsp;John 11:36; &nbsp;John 12:25; &nbsp;John 15:19, &nbsp;1 Timothy 6:10 [φιλαργυρία], &nbsp;2 Timothy 3:4 [φιληδόνος], &nbsp;Titus 2:4 [φίλανδρος], &nbsp;James 4:4 [φιλία τοῦ κόσμοὑ]). In Latin <i> diligere </i> corresponds to ἀγαπᾶν, <i> amare </i> to φιλεῖν, except that <i> amare </i> covers a wider range, corresponding also to the Greek ἐρᾶν. From this distinctive and fundamental meaning the fact may be explained that in biblical Greek ἀγαπᾶν is used exclusively where man’s love for God comes under consideration: it here implies the recognition of the adorable and lovable character of the Deity. φιλεῖν is never used of man’s love for God as such, because the mental attitude of intimacy which the word implies would be out of place in the creature with reference to the [[Deity]] (it is different where the love of the disciples for Jesus is spoken of [&nbsp;John 16:27; &nbsp;John 21:15-17, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 16:22]), [[Scripture]] prefers the word which unambiguously puts human love in the religious sphere on a moral and spiritual basis, even if, in order to do so, it has to leave somewhat of the intensity of the religious affection unexpressed. As designations of the love extending from God to man both ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν may be used, the former in so far as God’s love is not blind impulse or irrational sentiment, but a love of free self-determination, the latter because it is proper to God by a gracious condescension to enter into that close habitual friendship with man which the word connotes. As a matter of fact, however, φιλεῖν is but rarely used to describe the love of God towards man. </p> <p> In extra-biblical Greek love as extending from the gods to man seems to be an unknown conception, for according to [[Aristotle]] and [[Dio]] Chrysostom both ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν have place not in those who rule with reference to those they rule over, but only in the opposite direction: ἄτοπον φιλεῖν τὸν Δία (where Δία is the subject). </p> <p> It is in keeping with the distinction above drawn that the specific term for brotherly love (see articleBrotherly Love) is φιλαδελφία, for the idea is derived from the family-relation, although, of course, ἀγαπᾶν here occurs with equal frequency. On the other hand, of the love for enemies enjoined in the NT φιλεῖν never occurs, being excluded by the nature of the case, whereas ἀγαπᾶν, involving a deliberate movement of the will, may apply to such a relation. </p> <p> While it appears from what has been said that ἀγαπᾶν had by reason of its inherent signification and classical use an antecedent fitness to express the biblical idea of religious love, this should not be construed to mean that the word carried already in extra-biblical Greek all the content of the Scriptural conception. In the profane usage the moral, spiritual element was yet lacking, although the elements of choice and rational attachment were given. Like so many other words which possessed an antecedent affinity for the biblical world of thought from a formal point of view, it needed the baptism of regeneration in order to become fit for incorporation into the vocabulary of Scripture. </p> <p> The noun ἀγάπη seems to have been coined by the Septuagintto translate the OT conception of religious love. It is not found in classical Greek, nor even with [[Philo]] and Josephus. Perhaps the fact that the profane literature does not have the noun is significant. It can be explained on the principle that only through transference into the moral, spiritual sphere could the habitual character of the act of loving, which is inherent in the noun, originate. The noun in the [[Vulgate]] is <i> caritas </i> , from <i> carum habere </i> , which admirably expresses the specific character of the biblical conception. <i> [[Caritas]] </i> in turn gave rise to the ‘charity’ of the English Bible (Authorized Version), in most passages used of love towards fellow-Christians (cf., however, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3, &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 3:6, &nbsp;2 Timothy 2:22; &nbsp;2 Timothy 3:10, where there is no reason so to restrict it). The Revised Versionsubstitutes ‘love,’ in all passages where the Authorized Versionhas ‘charity’ (26 times in all), for the reason that ‘charity’ has in modern usage become restricted to the love of beneficence or forbearance. </p> <p> The following discussion confines itself to the love existing between God and man. For love as between man and man see articleBrotherly Love. </p> <p> <b> 2. Love in the apostolic teaching </b> .-Love is in the apostolic teaching a central and outstanding trait in the disposition of God towards man. In this respect the view taken by Jesus is fully adhered to. If in the witness of the early Church, as recorded in Acts, no direct affirmation of this principle is made, that can easily be explained from the apologetic purpose of this witness. In the fellowship of the first [[Christians]] among themselves the indirect operation of the new force introduced by Jesus into the hearts of His followers manifests itself clearly enough (&nbsp;Acts 2:41-47; &nbsp;Acts 4:32 ff.) </p> <p> i. St. Paul.-With St. Paul love is explicitly placed in the foreground as the fundamental disposition in God from which salvation springs and as that which in the possession of God constitutes for the believer the supreme treasure of religion. God is the God of love (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 13:11). In &nbsp;Galatians 5:22 love is named first among the fruits of the Spirit. It is associated with the Fatherhood of God (&nbsp;Ephesians 6:23). In the apostolic salutations it stands co-ordinated with the grace of Christ (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 13:14, &nbsp;Ephesians 6:23, &nbsp;2 Thessalonians 3:5). It is the greatest of the three fundamental graces of the [[Christian]] life, and the sole abiding one of those three (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:8-13). This primacy love can claim even in comparison with faith. For, on the one hand, faith as well as hope is a grace made necessary by the provisional conditions of the present sinful world, and in both its aspects-that of mediate spiritual perception and that of trust-will be superseded by sight in the world to come (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:7); on the other hand, faith as compared with love is instrumental, not an end in itself; it brings the Christian into that fundamental relation to God, wherein his religions faculties, foremost among which is love, can function normally (&nbsp;Galatians 5:6). The prominence of faith in the [[Pauline]] teaching is not therefore indicative of its absolute and final preponderance in the Christian consciousness. It would, however, scarcely be in accordance with St. Paul’s view to press the primacy of love to the extent of denying all independent significance to other religious states. There is an aspect in which faith in itself, and apart from its working through love, glorifies God (&nbsp;Romans 4:20), and whatever thus directly contributes to the [[Divine]] glory has inherent religious value. The same must be affirmed of the knowledge of God. The emphasis thrown throughout the NT on the value of truth cannot be wholly explained from its soteriological utility. It expresses the conviction that knowing and adoring God are in themselves a religious act, apart from all fructifying influence on the believer’s life. When St. Paul includes ‘knowledge’ (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:8) in the things that shall be done away, this applies only to the specific mode of knowledge in this life, the ‘seeing in a mirror darkly,’ the knowledge of a child, which will make place in the world to come for a full knowledge ‘face to face,’ analogous to the Divine knowledge of the believer (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:12). ‘Knowledge,’ while of value, is not equal in value to love (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3). </p> <p> ( <i> a </i> ) <i> The love of God </i> .-It has been alleged that in two respects the Apostle’s teaching on the love of God marks a retrogression as compared with the gospel of Jesus: on the one hand, St. Paul restricts the love of God to the circle of believers, thus making sonship co-extensive with adoption=justifications; on the other hand, he emphasizes, side by side with love, the working of sovereignty and justice as equally influential attributes in God, whence also the effectual communication of the Divine love to the sinner cannot, according to the Apostle, take place except as a result of the sovereign choice of God and after satisfaction to His justice. This charge, however, rests on a misunderstanding of the teaching of Jesus. Jesus, by way of correction to the prevailing commercial conception of God’s attitude towards man in Judaism, brings forward the love of God. Nevertheless the specific Fatherly love and the corresponding state of sonship are in His gospel, no less than with St. Paul, redemptive conceptions, pertaining not to man as such, but to the disciples, the heirs of the kingdom. This may be seen most clearly from the fact that in its highest aspect sonship is an eschatological attainment (&nbsp;Matthew 5:9, &nbsp;Luke 20:36; cf. &nbsp;Romans 8:23). It is true that a developed soteriology like St. Paul’s, delimiting the mutual claims or the love and justice of God, is not found in our Lord’s teaching. But this could not be expected before the supreme saving transaction-the Death of Christ-had actually taken place. The great principles on which the [[Atonement]] rests are enunciated with sufficient clearness (&nbsp;Mark 10:45). In comparisons between Jesus and St. Paul it is frequently overlooked that what corresponds to the Apostle’s soteriology is the eschatological element in Jesus’ teaching. As a matter of fact, St. Paul’s doctrine of salvation was developed in the closest dependence on his eschatology. If the comparison be instituted with this in mind, it will be seen that in our Lord’s eschatological utterances the sovereignty and justice of God occupy no less central a place than in the Pauline doctrine of salvation, and that the love of God in its eschatological setting is to Jesus as much a redemptive factor as it is in the Pauline gospel. </p> <p> The phrase ‘the love of God’ occurs in the Pauline [[Epistles]] in &nbsp;Romans 5:5; &nbsp;Romans 8:39, &nbsp;2 Corinthians 13:14, &nbsp;2 Thessalonians 3:5, &nbsp;Titus 3:4 (φιλανθρωπία); ‘the love of Christ’ occurs in &nbsp;Romans 8:35 (variant reading ‘love of God’), &nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14, &nbsp;Ephesians 3:19; ‘the love of God in Christ’ in &nbsp;Romans 8:39. In all these cases the genitive is a subjective genitive. In ‘the love of the Spirit’ (&nbsp;Romans 15:30) the genitive seems to be that of origin (cf. &nbsp;Colossians 1:8). Some exegetes propose for &nbsp;Romans 5:5 and &nbsp;2 Thessalonians 3:5 ‘love towards God.’ In the former passage the context is decisive against this (cf. &nbsp;2 Thessalonians 3:8, and the fact that the consciousness of ‘the love of God’ furnishes the basis for the certainty of the Christian hope). In &nbsp;2 Thessalonians 3:5 the sense is determined by the parallel phrase, ὑπομονὴ τοῦ Χριστοῦ; if this could mean the ‘patient waiting for Christ’ (Authorized Version), then ἀγαπὴ τοῦ θεοῦ would be love for God.’ Such a rendering, however, seems to be linguistically improbable, and the ordinary interpretation of ὑπομονή as ‘patience,’ ‘steadfastness,’ requires Χριστοῦ as a subjective genitive. The meaning is not that the love of God and the patience of Christ are held up as models to the readers, but the [[Apostle]] prays that their hearts may be directed to a full reliance on the love of God and the steadfastness of Christ as the two mainsprings of their salvation. In &nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14 ἡ γὰρ ἀγαπὴ τοῦ Χριστοῦ συνέχει ἡμᾶς is not to be explained on analogy with the preceding ‘fear of the Lord’ (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:11), nor in contrast to the knowledge of ‘Christ after the flesh’ (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:18), in the sense of St. Paul’s love for Christ; but, in close agreement with the following ‘One died for all,’ it is meant of the love Christ showed by His Death. </p> <p> To St. Paul the love of God is throughout a specifically redemptive love. Its manifestation is seldom sought in Nature and providence (&nbsp;Romans 8:28, ‘all things’), but regularly in the work of salvation. Since this work culminates in the Death of Christ, the Cross is the crowning manifestation of the Divine love (&nbsp;Romans 5:8). What thus finds supreme expression at its height underlies the entire process as its primordial source. The love of God is to St. Paul the fountain of redemption. It lies behind its objective part, what is theologically called ‘the Atonement,’ for St. Paul traces this in both its aspects of reconciliation and redemption to the one source. As regards reconciliation, the initiative of love is inherent in the conception itself, since God makes those who were objectively His enemies His friends, creating by the Death of Christ the possibility for His love to manifest itself (&nbsp;Romans 5:8; &nbsp;Romans 5:10-11, &nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14; &nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:18-21). The idea of redemption has the same implications, for it emphasizes the self-sacrifice of love to which God was put in saving man (&nbsp;Acts 20:28, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 6:20; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 7:23). This love is unmerited love, hence its more specific name of χάρις; ‘grace.’ It is love,’ not mere ‘mercy’ or ‘pity,’ which determines God’s attitude towards the sinner. The mercy is enriched by the love (&nbsp;Ephesians 2:4). The usual associations of ἀγαπᾶν apply to the love of God for sinners only in so far as it is a deliberate movement of the Divine will and purpose, not because there is something admirable or attractive in the spiritual and ethical condition of man which would explain its origin. For the very reason that it springs spontaneously from God without objective motivation, this Divine love is a mystery ‘passing knowledge’ (&nbsp;Ephesians 3:19). [[Salvation]] on its subjective side is derived by St. Paul even more clearly from the love of God. The gift of the Spirit is a pledge of it to the believer; hence with the pouring forth of the Spirit into the heart, the love of God is poured out therein (&nbsp;Romans 5:5). On the consciousness of this love rests the certainty of hope in the completion of salvation (&nbsp;Romans 5:4-5). St. Paul calls the love underlying the application of redemption πρόγυωσις, ‘foreknowledge’ (&nbsp;Romans 8:29); the simple γιγνώσκειν in this specific sense occurs in &nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3, &nbsp;Galatians 4:9, &nbsp;2 Timothy 2:19. This term denotes not an intellectual prescience; but, in dependence on the pregnant sense of the [[Hebrew]] ידע (&nbsp;Exodus 2:25, &nbsp;Hosea 13:5, &nbsp;Amos 3:2), it means that God sovereignly sets His affection upon a person. The absoluteness and unconditioned character of this <i> prognosis </i> are such that it can furnish proof for the proposition that all things work together for the good of believers. Hence it fixes as the destiny of believers (‘predestination’) eschatological likeness unto the image of the glorified Christ, and with infallible certainty moves forward through the two intermediate stages of vocation and justification to the goal of this glory (&nbsp;Romans 8:28-30). The conception of ἐκλογή, ἐκλέγεσθαι (middle voice, ‘to choose for one’s self’) has likewise for its correlate the sovereign love of God (&nbsp;Ephesians 1:4). The association of the redemptive love of God with His prerogative of sovereign choice renders the word ἀγαπᾶν especially suitable for describing the relation involved. It is in the interest of emphasizing both the sovereign Divine initiative and the energy and richness of effectuation of redemptive love that St. Paul affirms its eternity (connoted also by the προ in προγιγώσκειν [&nbsp;Ephesians 1:4]). </p> <p> The love of God does not exclude for St. Paul the co-ordination of other attributes in God as jointly determinative of the Divine redemptive procedure. In the Cross of Christ is the great manifestation of love, but it is not the love of God alone that the Cross proclaim. It also demonstrates the δικαιοσύνη = the justice of God (&nbsp;Romans 3:25 ff.). The attempt of Ritschl ( <i> Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung </i> 2, ii. [1882-83], pp. 118, 218ff.) and others to give to δικαιοσύνη in this context the sense of gracious righteousness, making it synonymous with the love of God, breaks down in view of the ‘forbearance’ of &nbsp;Romans 3:25. If it was ‘forbearance’ which postponed under the Old [[Covenant]] the demonstration of God’s righteousness, then this righteousness is conceived as retributive. </p> <p> ( <i> b </i> ) <i> The love of Christ </i> .-The love of Christ St. Paul views chiefly as manifested in His Death (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14 f.), or in His life as entered upon and lived with a view to and culminating in His Death (&nbsp;Philippians 2:5 ff). The [[Incarnation]] is an act of self-kenosis, not in the metaphysical, but in the metaphorical sense (Authorized Version‘made himself of no reputation’); hence is described in &nbsp;2 Corinthians 8:9 as a ‘becoming poor.’ It ought to be noticed that the love of Christ, as well as that of the believer, is in the first place a love for God, and after that a love for man. Christ lives unto God, even in the state of glory (&nbsp;Romans 6:10), and gave Himself in the Atonement: a sacrifice unto God (&nbsp;Ephesians 5:2). </p> <p> ( <i> c </i> ) <i> Love towards God </i> .-The references to the believer’s love for God are not numerous in the Pauline Epistles. Explicit mention of it is mode in &nbsp;Romans 8:28, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 2:9; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3. From his anti-pietistic standpoint Ritschl would interpret this scarcity of reference in St. Paul and the NT generally (outside of St. Paul only &nbsp;James 1:12; &nbsp;James 2:5) as due to the feeling that love to God is something hardly within the religious reach of man. He observes that in &nbsp;1 Corinthians 2:9 the phrase ‘them that love God’ is a quotation, and surmises that the same quotation underlies all the other passages except &nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3 ( <i> op. cit. </i> ii 100). But this is a mere surmise, and St. Paul has at least in one passage appropriated the thought for himself. Besides this the analogy of the love of Christ for God favours the ascription of love for God to the believer. The same ‘living for God’ which is predicated of Christ (&nbsp;Romans 6:10) is elsewhere attributed to the Christian (&nbsp;Galatians 2:19). As Christ sacrificed Himself to God (&nbsp;Ephesians 5:2), so the believer’s life is a spiritual sacrifice (&nbsp;Romans 1:9; &nbsp;Romans 12:1). The Fatherhood of God and the sonship of the believer postulate the idea of a mutual love (&nbsp;Romans 8:15). The idea is also implied in the fact that St. Paul places at the beginning of the Christian life a crucifixion and destruction of the love for self and the world (&nbsp;Romans 6:6, &nbsp;Galatians 2:19; &nbsp;Galatians 6:14), since under the Apostle’s positive conception of the Christian life something else must take the place of the previous goals. The glorifying of God in all things has for its underlying motive the love of God (&nbsp;Romans 14:8, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 10:31, &nbsp;Ephesians 1:12). </p> <p> ii. Pastoral Epistles.-In the Pastoral Epistles the universality of the love of God is emphasized. In the earlier Epistles the Apostle’s universalism is not deduced from the love of God but from other principles, and is distinctly of an international type. The Pastoral Epistles make of the love of God a universalizing principle and extend it to all men, not merely to men of every nation (&nbsp;1 Timothy 2:4; &nbsp;1 Timothy 2:8; &nbsp;1 Timothy 4:10; &nbsp;1 Timothy 6:13, &nbsp;Titus 2:11; &nbsp;Titus 3:4). In some of these passages the context clearly indicates that a reference of God’s love to all <i> classes </i> of men is intended (cf. &nbsp;1 Timothy 2:4 with &nbsp;1 Timothy 2:1-2; &nbsp;Titus 2:11, with &nbsp;Titus 2:2-10). But the emphasis and frequency with which the principle is brought forward render it probable that some specific motive underlies its assertion. So far as the inclusion of magistrates is concerned, there may be a protest against a form of [[Jewish]] particularism which deemed it unlawful to pray for pagan magistrates. In the main the passages cited will have to be interpreted as a warning against the dualistic trend of Gnosticism. [[Gnosticism]] distinguished between two classes of men, the πνευματικοἱ and the ὑλικοί, the latter by their very nature being unsusceptible to, and excluded from, salvation, the former carrying the potency of salvation by nature in themselves. Over against this the [[Pastorals]] emphasize that the love of God saves all men, that no man is by his subjective condition either sunk beneath the possibility or raised above the necessity of salvation. Hence the φιλανθρωπία of God in &nbsp;Titus 3:4 is love for man as man, not for any aristocracy of the πνεῦμα. This philanthropy is not to be confounded with the classical conception of the same (cf. &nbsp;Acts 27:3; &nbsp;Acts 28:2), for the latter is not love towards man as such, but simply justice towards one’s fellow-man in the several relations of life, and is conceived without regard to the internal disposition. Probably the choice of the word is in &nbsp;Titus 3:4 determined by the preceding description of the conduct required of believers for which the Divine ‘philanthropy’ furnishes the model. But that its content goes far beyond general benevolence may be seen from this, that it communicates itself through the Christian redemption in the widest sense (&nbsp;Titus 3:5-7). In all this there is nothing either calculated or intended to weaken the Pauline doctrine of the specific elective love of God embracing believers. The Pastorals affirm this no less than the earlier Epistles. </p> <p> iii. [[Epistle]] of James.-The Epistle of James by calling the commandment of love ‘the royal law’ (&nbsp;James 2:8) places love in the centre of religion. This love is not merely love for men but love to God (&nbsp;James 2:5). It chooses God and rejects the world, the love for God and the friendship of the world being mutually exclusive (&nbsp;James 4:4). It manifests itself in blessing God (&nbsp;James 3:9). [[Behind]] this love for God, however, St. James, no less than St. Paul and St. John, posits the love of God for the sinner. God is Father of believers (&nbsp;James 3:9). They that love God are chosen of God (&nbsp;James 2:5). The Divine love is a love of mercy; even in the Day of [[Judgment]] it retains the form of mercy (&nbsp;James 2:13, &nbsp;James 5:20). It is a jealous love, which requires the undivided affection of its object (&nbsp;James 4:3). An echo of the Synoptical preaching of Jesus may be found in this that St. James sees the love of God demonstrated in the gifts not merely of redemption, but likewise of providence (&nbsp;James 1:17). </p> <p> iv. Epistles of Peter.-The Epistles of Peter dwell on the love of Christ rather than on that of God. Christ’s love is a love of self-denial (&nbsp;1 Peter 2:21) and of benevolence for evil-doers (&nbsp;1 Peter 3:18). To it corresponds love for Christ in the heart of believers. St. Peter shows that this love is strong enough to assert and maintain itself in the face of the invisibleness of Christ (&nbsp;1 Peter 1:8; cf. &nbsp;1 John 4:20 f.). The love for God and Christ is consistent with and accompanied by fear (&nbsp;1 Peter 1:17-18). God’s love is implied in the mercy which lies behind regeneration (&nbsp;1 Peter 1:3). God is the Father of believers (&nbsp;1 Peter 1:17); they are the flock of God (&nbsp;1 Peter 5:2); He (or Christ) is the [[Shepherd]] of their souls (&nbsp;1 Peter 2:25). The longsuffering of God, as a fruit of the Divine love, is mentioned in &nbsp;2 Peter 3:9. </p> <p> v. Hebrews.-The theme of the Epistle to the Hebrews-the perfect mediation of priestly approach unto God-coupled with the writer’s vivid perception of the majesty of God brings it about that the love of God remains in the background. The Epistle emphasizes the fear of God even for believers (&nbsp;Hebrews 4:1; &nbsp;Hebrews 4:11-13; &nbsp;Hebrews 12:29). Still believers are sons of God (&nbsp;Hebrews 2:10, &nbsp;Hebrews 12:7), brethren of Christ (&nbsp;Hebrews 2:11, &nbsp;Hebrews 12:17). God loves His children as the Father of Spirits (&nbsp;Hebrews 12:6-10). He is the God of His people in the pregnant sense (&nbsp;Hebrews 11:16). The subsumption of the greater part of the religious consciousness under faith brings it about that the love of Christians is less spoken of here than elsewhere in the NT. It is mentioned in &nbsp;Hebrews 6:10 as a love shown towards God’s name, <i> i.e. </i> towards God, in the service of the brethren. The Epistle, on the other hand, makes much of the love of Christ for believers as it assumes the form of mercy. This mercy is, however, not motived by the mere suffering as such, but specifically by the moral aspect of the suffering. It is compassion with the moral weakness and danger arising from suffering, because suffering becomes a source of temptation. Christ can exercise this mercy because He Himself has experienced the tempting power of suffering (&nbsp;Hebrews 2:18, &nbsp;Hebrews 4:15). </p> <p> vi. Johannine Literature.-There still remains to be considered the Johannine literature including the Gospel, so far as the statements of the [[Evangelist]] himself are concerned. Both the [[Gospel]] and the First Epistle represent love as the ultimate source and the ultimate goal of Christianity. There is this difference, that what is in the Gospel related to Christ as love of Christ and love for Christ, is in the Epistle related to God in both directions. In the [[Apocalypse]] love to Jesus appears in &nbsp;Revelation 2:4, love of Jesus in &nbsp;Revelation 1:5, &nbsp;Revelation 3:9. ‘The love of God’ is not uniformly, as in St. Paul, the love which God shows, but partly this (&nbsp;1 John 2:5; &nbsp;1 John 4:9; &nbsp;1 John 4:12) and partly also the love cherished towards God (&nbsp;John 5:42, &nbsp;1 John 2:15; &nbsp;1 John 3:17; &nbsp;1 John 5:3). Possibly the construction is meant as an inclusive one: ‘the love which God has made known and which answers to His nature’ (so B. F. Westcott, <i> The Epistles of St. John </i> , 1883, p. 49). Love is to St. John as to St. Paul a specifically Divine thing. Wherever it appears in man, it must be traced back to God, and particularly to God’s love (&nbsp;1 John 4:10; &nbsp;1 John 4:19). Its source lies in regeneration (&nbsp;1 John 4:7). The Divine primordial love is grace, not motived by the excellence of human qualities, for it expressed itself in giving Christ as a propitiation for sin (&nbsp;1 John 4:9-10). The supreme manifestation of God’s love is the gift of Christ, and Christ’s giving of His own life for man (&nbsp;1 John 3:16, &nbsp;1 John 4:8, &nbsp;Revelation 3:9). Hence the Gospel characterizes the love which Jesus showed in His Death as an ἀγαπᾶν εἰς τέλος (‘to the uttermost’). The giving of the Spirit of God is an act of love not merely because the Spirit is an inestimable gift, but because in the Spirit God communicates Himself; herein lies the essence of love (&nbsp;1 John 3:23; &nbsp;1 John 4:13). The highest embodiment of this redemptive love is the state of sonship (&nbsp;1 John 3:1). The Apocalypse uses for this, as extending to the Church collectively, the OT figure of the bride of God (&nbsp;Revelation 19:7; &nbsp;Revelation 21:1; &nbsp;Revelation 21:9). Sonship is not represented, as in St. Paul, as awaiting its eschatological consummation, but rather as issuing into a higher, yet unknown, state (&nbsp;1 John 3:2). The summing up of the Christian life in love is represented as ‘a new commandment,’ which is at the same time old (&nbsp;1 John 2:7-8, &nbsp;1 John 3:11; &nbsp;1 John 3:23). It is old in so far as it goes back to the creation (‘from the beginning’ [&nbsp;1 John 2:7, &nbsp;1 John 3:11, &nbsp;2 John 1:5-6); it is new in so far as through Jesus and His work it has now become an actuality in the life and experience of Christians; hence ‘it is <i> true </i> in him and in you’ (&nbsp;1 John 2:8). In both the Gospel and the First Epistle ‘to know God’ is used as synonymous with ‘loving God.’ ‘To know’ is taken in such connexions in the pregnant sense which implies intimacy of acquaintance and the fellowship of affection. At the same time there is in this an indirect protest against the unethical intellectualism of the false Gnosis (&nbsp;1 John 2:3; &nbsp;1 John 4:13-14; &nbsp;1 John 3:1; &nbsp;1 John 3:6; &nbsp;1 John 4:6-8; &nbsp;1 John 4:16; &nbsp;1 John 5:20). </p> <p> Both the Gospel and the First Epistle emphasize the universalism of the love of God as demonstrated in the gift of Christ for the sin of ‘the world.’ In &nbsp;John 3:16 ‘the world’ (ὁ κόσμος) seems to be rather qualitatively than quantitatively conceived; the greatness of God’s love is seen in this, that He loves that which is sinful (cf. &nbsp;1 John 2:2). Both the Gospel and the Epistle also lay stress on the primacy of love in the character of God (&nbsp;1 John 4:8; &nbsp;1 John 4:16). That the universalism must not be understood as appropriating the love of God in its most pregnant sense to every man indiscriminately appears from such statements as &nbsp;John 6:37; &nbsp;John 6:39; &nbsp;John 6:44; &nbsp;John 13:1; &nbsp;John 15:19; &nbsp;John 17:6; &nbsp;John 17:9; &nbsp;John 17:12. A predestinarian strand is traceable in St. John as well as in St. Paul. And that the clear statement about the primacy of love in God should not be construed to the exclusion of every other attribute or disposition in God appears plainly from the difference which both the Gospel and the Epistle make between God’s and Christ’s attitude towards the world and towards believers-a difference inconceivable were there in God no place for aught but love. The statement ‘God is love’ means to affirm that into His love God puts His entire being, all the strength of His character. In the Apocalypse it is most vividly brought out that in God, besides love for His own, there is wrath for His enemies (cf. even ‘the wrath of the Lamb’ [6:16]), although it is to be noticed that the Apocalypse speaks as little as the Gospel and the Epistle of God’s hatred towards His enemies. The latter term is reserved for the description of the attitude of the world towards God and Christ and believers. The hatred of the world explains the righteous wrath of God and believers against the world (&nbsp;John 3:20; &nbsp;John 7:7; &nbsp;John 15:18; &nbsp;John 15:23-25; &nbsp;John 17:14, &nbsp;Revelation 2:6). </p> <p> Literature.-Schmidt, <i> Handbuch der latein. und griech. Synonymik </i> , 1886, pp. 756-768; R. C. Trench, <i> NT Synonyms </i> 9, 1901, pp. 41-44; J. A. H. Tittmann, <i> de Synonymis in NT </i> , 1829-32, pp. 50-55; H. Cremer, <i> Bibt.-Theol. Wörterbuch der neutest. Gräcität </i> 5, 1911, <i> s.v. </i> ἀγαπάω; Deissmann in <i> ThLZ </i> [Note: hLZ Theologische Litteraturzeitung.], 1912, cols. 522-523; E. Sartorius, <i> The [[Doctrine]] of the Divine Love </i> , Eng. translation, 1884; G. Vos, ‘The Scriptural Doctrine of the Love of God,’ in <i> Presb. and Ref. Review </i> , xiii. [1902] 1-37; W. Lütgert, <i> Die Liebe im NT </i> , 1905. </p> <p> Geerhardus Vos. </p>
       
== Bridgeway Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_18819" /> ==
<p> In the language of the Bible, as in most other languages, the word ‘love’ has a very broad meaning. It may apply to God’s love for people (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:12-13; &nbsp;John 3:16), people’s devotion to God (&nbsp;Psalms 91:14; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3), pure sexual love between a man and a woman (&nbsp;Proverbs 5:18-19; Song of &nbsp;Song of [[Solomon]] 2:4-5), impure sexual activity such as in prostitution (&nbsp;Jeremiah 4:30; &nbsp;Hosea 2:12-13), love between members of a family where sexual feelings are not involved (&nbsp;Genesis 22:2; &nbsp;Ruth 4:15), an attitude of kindness towards others, whether friends or enemies (&nbsp;Leviticus 19:17-18; &nbsp;1 Samuel 18:1; &nbsp;1 Samuel 18:16; &nbsp;Matthew 5:43-46; &nbsp;John 11:3), or the desire for things that brings pleasure or satisfaction (&nbsp;Proverbs 20:13; &nbsp;1 Timothy 6:10). </p> <p> Where the Bible gives teaching about love, the centre of love is usually the will, not the emotions. Such love is a deliberate attitude, not an uncontrollable feeling (&nbsp;Matthew 5:44-46Joh_13:34; &nbsp;John 15:17; &nbsp;Ephesians 5:25; &nbsp;Titus 2:4; &nbsp;1 John 4:20-21). </p> <p> Christian love does not mean that Christians try to create certain feelings towards others, but that they act towards others the way they know they should (&nbsp;Luke 10:27; &nbsp;Luke 10:29; &nbsp;Luke 10:37). The reason why they so act is that God’s love rules their lives, making them want to do God’s will (&nbsp;Romans 5:5; &nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14; &nbsp;1 John 4:19). The more they act towards others in love, the more favourable their feelings will become towards those people. </p> <p> '''Divine love''' </p> <p> The love that God has for the sinful human race originates solely in his sovereign will. He loves people because he chooses to love them, not because they in any way deserve his love (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:7-8; &nbsp;Jeremiah 31:3; &nbsp;Romans 5:8; &nbsp;Ephesians 1:4; &nbsp;Ephesians 2:4-5; &nbsp;1 John 3:1; &nbsp;1 John 4:10). </p> <p> This was seen clearly in Jesus Christ, who throughout his life helped those in need and by his death saved helpless sinners. Salvation originates in the love of God, and that love found its fullest expression in the cross of Jesus Christ (&nbsp;Matthew 14:14; &nbsp;Mark 10:21; &nbsp;Luke 7:13; &nbsp;John 3:16; &nbsp;John 15:13; &nbsp;Galatians 2:20; &nbsp;Ephesians 2:4-7; &nbsp;Ephesians 5:25; &nbsp;1 John 4:9; see also [[Mercy]] ). Jesus Christ could perfectly express God’s love, because he and the Father are bound together in a perfect unity in which each loves the other (&nbsp;John 3:35; &nbsp;John 10:30; &nbsp;John 14:31; &nbsp;John 15:9; &nbsp;John 17:24). </p> <p> So much is love the dominating characteristic of the divine nature that the Bible declares that God is love. Everything that God says or does is in some way an expression of his love (&nbsp;1 John 4:8; &nbsp;1 John 4:16). </p> <p> If we find this statement hard to understand when we think of God’s wrath and judgment, the reason is probably that we misunderstand the nature of love. God’s love is not an irrational emotion divorced from justice and righteousness, but a firm and steadfast attitude that earnestly desires the well-being of his creatures. God has such a love for what is right that he reacts in righteous anger against all that is wrong. God’s wrath is the outcome of his love (&nbsp;Habakkuk 1:13; &nbsp;1 John 1:5; see [[Wrath]] ). </p> <p> God wants to forgive sinners, but because he is a God of love he cannot treat sin as if it does not matter. He cannot ignore it. His act of forgiveness, being based on love, involves dealing with sin. At the same time, because he is a God of love, he provides a way of salvation so that sinners need not suffer the punishment themselves. He has done this by becoming a human being in the person of Jesus Christ and taking the punishment himself on the cross (&nbsp;John 1:14-18; &nbsp;John 3:16; &nbsp;Romans 5:8; &nbsp;Galatians 2:20; &nbsp;1 John 4:10; see [[Atonement]] ). </p> <p> This same love causes God to discipline, correct and train his children, so that they might grow into the sorts of people that he, in his superior wisdom, wants them to be. God’s love towards his children is an authoritative love; their love in response is an obedient love (&nbsp;John 14:15; &nbsp;John 14:21; &nbsp;John 16:27; &nbsp;1 John 2:4-5; &nbsp;1 John 4:19; &nbsp;1 John 5:2-3). God’s chastisement may seem painful rather than pleasant, but to ask God to cease his chastisement is to ask him to love us less, not more (&nbsp;Hebrews 12:5-11; see [[Chastisement]] ). Love desires perfection in the one who is loved, and will not be satisfied with anything less (&nbsp;Ephesians 5:25-27; &nbsp;James 4:5). </p> <p> Christians should accept whatever happens to them as being in some way an expression of God’s love and as being in accordance with God’s purposes for them (&nbsp;Romans 8:28; see [[Providence]] ). God’s gift of his Son is the guarantee that all his other gifts will also be an expression of his love (&nbsp;Romans 8:32). His love is everlasting and measureless. Nothing in life or death can separate believers from it (&nbsp;Jeremiah 31:3; &nbsp;Romans 8:35-39; &nbsp;Ephesians 3:18-19). </p> <p> '''Human love''' </p> <p> Those whom God created have a duty to love him with their whole being. They are to be devoted to him and obedient to him (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 6:5; &nbsp;Deuteronomy 10:12; &nbsp;Psalms 18:1-3; &nbsp;Matthew 22:37). As a result of such devoted obedience they will learn more of the meaning of God’s love and so will increasingly experience joyful fellowship with him (&nbsp;Psalms 116:1-4; &nbsp;John 14:21-23; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 2:9; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3; &nbsp;1 Peter 1:8; &nbsp;1 John 4:7; &nbsp;1 John 4:12; &nbsp;1 John 4:19). </p> <p> Love for God will at times create difficulties. Conflicts will arise as people put loyalty to God before all other loyalties, desires and ambitions (&nbsp;Matthew 6:24; &nbsp;Matthew 10:37-39; &nbsp;John 3:19; &nbsp;1 John 2:15-17). Genuine love involves self-sacrifice (&nbsp;Ephesians 5:25; cf. &nbsp;Romans 14:15; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:4-7). </p> <p> Faith and obedience are just as basic to a relationship with God as is love. If people claim to love God but do not trust in him or obey him, they are deceiving themselves (&nbsp;John 14:15; &nbsp;John 14:24; &nbsp;Galatians 5:6; &nbsp;James 2:5). Likewise they are deceiving themselves if they claim to love God but do not love their fellow human beings (&nbsp;Romans 13:10; &nbsp;1 John 3:10; &nbsp;1 John 3:17; &nbsp;1 John 4:8; &nbsp;1 John 4:20). Christians must have the same loving concern for others as they have for themselves (&nbsp;Matthew 22:39; &nbsp;Philippians 2:4). Love is a characteristic of those in whom the Spirit of Christ dwells; for when they receive God’s salvation in Christ, the [[Holy]] Spirit fills them with God’s love (&nbsp;John 15:9-10; &nbsp;Romans 5:5; &nbsp;Galatians 5:22; &nbsp;Ephesians 3:17-19; &nbsp;Ephesians 5:1-2). </p> <p> Christians should exercise this love towards everyone, and in particular towards fellow Christians (&nbsp;John 13:34; &nbsp;John 15:12-17; &nbsp;Galatians 6:10; &nbsp;1 Peter 3:8; &nbsp;1 John 3:16-17). Such an exercise of love provides evidence that they really are Christians (&nbsp;John 13:35; &nbsp;1 John 3:14) and helps them grow towards spiritual maturity (&nbsp;1 John 4:12; &nbsp;1 John 4:17). The church of God is founded upon love and builds itself up through love (&nbsp;Ephesians 3:17; &nbsp;Ephesians 4:16). A unity of love between Christians will be clear evidence to the world that the claims of [[Christianity]] are true (&nbsp;John 17:20-23). </p> <p> Although love for each other is something God demands, people should not practise that love solely as a legal requirement. They must act sincerely and display right attitudes, even when they feel no natural affection for the person concerned (&nbsp;Exodus 23:4-5; &nbsp;Leviticus 19:17-18; &nbsp;Romans 12:9; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:4-7; &nbsp;1 Timothy 1:5). Good deeds may be worthless in God’s sight if they do not arise out of sincere love (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:1-3; &nbsp;Revelation 2:2-4). </p> <p> '''Steadfast love''' </p> <p> In the Old [[Testament]] the special love that God had for [[Israel]] was signified by the Hebrew word chesed. It is difficult to find an exact equivalent of this word in English. The RSV translates it mainly as ‘steadfast love’, the GNB as ‘constant love’, and the older English versions as ‘mercy’, ‘kindness’ and ‘loving kindness’ (cf. &nbsp;Genesis 32:10; &nbsp;Genesis 39:21; &nbsp;Psalms 100:5; &nbsp;Psalms 118:1-3; &nbsp;Isaiah 54:10; &nbsp;Hosea 2:19; &nbsp;Micah 7:18). </p> <p> The distinctive feature of chesed is covenant loyalty or faithfulness. A covenant is an agreement between two parties that carries with it obligations and blessings, and in the case of God and Israel this covenant was likened to the marriage bond. The two parties were bound to be loyal to each other (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:9; &nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:12; &nbsp;Nehemiah 1:5; see [[Covenant]] ). God exercised loyal love and covenant faithfulness to his people, and this was to be the basis of their trust in him (&nbsp;1 Kings 8:23; &nbsp;Psalms 13:5; &nbsp;Psalms 25:7; &nbsp;Psalms 103:17; &nbsp;Psalms 136:25; &nbsp;Hosea 2:19; &nbsp;Micah 7:20). Yet so often the people were not faithful to God in return. Their covenant love vanished (&nbsp;Hosea 6:4; &nbsp;Hosea 11:1-4). </p> <p> This chesed – this faithful devotion, this loyal love – is what God most desires from his people (&nbsp;Hosea 6:6). It also shows the quality of love that God requires his people to exercise towards others (&nbsp;Proverbs 3:3-4; &nbsp;Hosea 12:6; &nbsp;Micah 6:8). </p>
       
== Holman Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_42030" /> ==
&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:1 <i> charity </i> <i> agape </i> <i> charity </i> <i> caritas </i> <i> charity </i> <i> love </i> <i> agape </i> <i> agape </i> <p> In the Old Testament In the Old Testament, the verb "to love" has a range of meanings as broad as the English verb. It describes physical love between the sexes, even sexual desire (&nbsp;Judges 16:14; &nbsp;2 Samuel 13:1-4 ). It describes the love within a family and among friends (&nbsp;Genesis 22:1-2 ). Love as self-giving appears in the significant commandment that [[Israelites]] love the stranger. The basis for such selfless love is God's act of redemption (&nbsp;Leviticus 19:33-34 ). </p> <p> Hosea used the image of married love to teach us to understand both the faithlessness of Israel and the faithfulness of God. Israel's love is "like a morning cloud, and as the early dew it goeth away" (&nbsp;Hosea 6:4 ). God desires steadfast love, but Israel had been unfaithful. His own relationship with an adulterous wife allowed Hosea the insight that God had not given up Israel in spite of her faithlessness. The <i> [[Shema]] </i> (Hebrew for "hear") of &nbsp; Deuteronomy 6:4-6 is echoed in Paul's declaration that love is the fulfillment of the law (&nbsp; Romans 13:10 ). </p> <p> In the Teachings of Jesus In Jesus' teachings in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, the <i> Shema </i> of Deuteronomy (the command to love God) is united with &nbsp; Leviticus 19:8 ("Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself") (&nbsp; Matthew 22:34-40; &nbsp;Mark 12:28-34; &nbsp;Luke 10:25-28 ). Just before the parable of the Good Samaritan, a lawyer quoted the two commands to love and then asked Jesus: "And who is my neighbor?" (&nbsp;Luke 10:29 ) Jesus gave the story of the [[Samaritan]] who took care of the man who fell among robbers to illustrate the selfless love which is to be characteristic of citizens of the Kingdom. </p> <p> In &nbsp;Matthew 5:43-48 , Jesus gave the radical command to love one's enemies and to pray for those who persecute. [[Loving]] only those who love you is, according to Jesus, no better than those who are not His disciples. The love that Jesus' disciples have for others is to be just as complete as God's love (&nbsp;Matthew 5:48; compare &nbsp;Romans 5:8 ). </p> <p> In these teachings, of course, the selfless love is a response to God's prior activity. It is a way of living expected of those who are citizens of the Kingdom. The teachings of Jesus on love of enemy, it will be noted, are a part of the [[Sermon]] on the Mount which is directed to Christian disciples. See [[Sermon On The Mount]] . </p> <p> In the Teachings of Paul In the poem on love in &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:1 , Paul associated love with the all-important biblical words of faith and hope (see also &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 5:8; &nbsp;Galatians 5:6 ) and declared love the greatest. The context for this poem on love is Paul's discussion of relationships within the church. &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:1-3 indicate that the gifts of the Spirit (ecstatic speech, wisdom, faith, and self-sacrifice) are good for nothing without love; only love builds up. The Spirit distributes His gifts for the common good (&nbsp; 1 Corinthians 8:1; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 12:7 ). &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:4-7 characterizes love: Love is patient and kind, not jealous or boastful, not arrogant or rude. Love is not selfish, irritable, or resentful. Love does not rejoice at wrong but in the right. Love bears, believes, hopes, and endures all things. </p> <p> Finally, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:8-13 contrasts love with preaching and knowledge, on the one hand, and faith and hope, on the other. All of these (with love) are important aspects of our lives here and now. Love in contrast to these, however, is not only for the here and now; it is forever. Love, therefore, is "the greatest" of the most significant realities we experience as Christians. </p> <p> Paul's understanding and discussion of love make love a central theme, and his use of the noun agape makes that term almost a technical term. [[Prior]] to Paul, in fact, the Greek term <i> agape </i> was little used. Instead of using a word for love already filled with meaning, Paul took the seldom-used term and filled it with Christian meaning. This love of which Paul wrote is somewhat different from the love we normally experience and speak about. Christian love is not simply an emotion which arises because of the character of the one loved. It is not due to the loving quality of the lover. It is a relationship of self-giving which results from God's activity in Christ. The source of Christian love is God (&nbsp; Romans 5:8 ), and the believer's response of faith makes love a human possibility (&nbsp;Romans 5:5 ). </p> <p> Even though love does not begin in the human heart, the believer must actualize love. In Paul's admonition to Christians to love, the nature of love as self-giving is manifest (&nbsp;Galatians 5:13-15 ). The Christian walk is to be characterized by love so that Paul could even speak of "walking in love" (&nbsp;Romans 14:15 ). The Christian is to increase and abound in love (&nbsp;1 Thessalonians 3:12 ). </p> <p> Love is vitally connected with faith in that the believer's faithful response is one of love. Love is also connected with hope. In his prayer for love to increase and abound, Paul indicated that this increase of love has the end that the hearts of Christians might be established "unblameable in holiness" before God when Jesus returns with all his saints (&nbsp;1 Thessalonians 3:13 ). Paul also wrote of the hope we have of sharing the glory of God and declared that this hope does not disappoint us, because our hearts have been filled with God's love through the Holy Spirit (&nbsp;Romans 5:2 ,Romans 5:2,&nbsp;5:5 ). Christian love is evidence of and a foretaste of the goal of God's purposes for His children. </p> <p> In the Writings of John The Johannine writings magnify the significance of love as forcefully and fully as any other writings. John's writings account for only one tenth of the New Testament but provide one third of the references to love. </p> <p> The key text in the first half of the Gospel of John is &nbsp;John 3:16 . This passage indicates the relationship of the Father's love to the work of Christ and of both to the life of believers. These themes are repeated throughout the Gospel of John. The second half of the Gospel of John emphasizes the ethical dimension of love among Christians. The key passage is Jesus' new commandment in &nbsp;John 13:34-35 (sec also &nbsp; John 14:15 ,John 14:15,&nbsp;14:21 ,John 14:21,&nbsp;14:23-24; &nbsp;John 15:9 ,John 15:9,&nbsp;15:12 ,John 15:12,&nbsp;15:17 ). </p> <p> This command of Jesus to love one another gives us insight into the nature of Jesus Christ for the church and the nature of Christian love. What is commanded is not an emotion; it is the disciplined will to seek the welfare of others. Jesus speaks with the authority of the Father, the only One with authority to make such demands of men and women. Jesus speaks as the incarnate Word (&nbsp;John 1:1 ,John 1:1,&nbsp;1:14 ). He has authority to give conditions for discipleship. The relationship of this commandment to &nbsp;Leviticus 19:18 should be noted. Both command love, but Jesus' commandment includes the clause: "as I have loved you." </p> <p> When the overall importance of love in the Gospel of John is seen, the dialogue between Jesus and Peter concerning Peter's love for Jesus and Peter's tending the sheep (&nbsp;Leviticus 21:15-17 ) becomes more significant. Our love for Jesus Christ is closely related to our fulfillment of the pastoral task. </p> <p> The [[Letters]] of John make explicit statements about the ethical implications of love. Our appreciation of these letters and the command to love is increased when we realize that John's opponents claimed that they loved God in spite of their unlovely temper and conduct. They claimed enlightenment and communion with God. (They were [[Gnostics]] or "Knowers." See &nbsp;1 John 3:23 ). This love is be manifested in deeds (&nbsp;1 John 3:18 ). John left no doubt about the relationship of love and belief in God. Whoever hates his brother is in the darkness (&nbsp;1 John 2:9 ). Whoever does not do right and love his brother is not of God (&nbsp;1 John 4:20 ). &nbsp;1 John 4:8 is the climax: "He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love." </p> <p> In 2,3John this command to love is repeated in direct and indirect ways. &nbsp;2 John 1:5-6 is addressed to the church, and they are explicitly reminded of the command from Jesus to love one another. &nbsp; 3 John 1:5-6 speaks of the love of the "Beloved Gaius" in terms of giving service to Christian brothers. Diotrephes, however, will live in infamy, for he put himself first, refused to welcome the brethren, stopped those who wanted to welcome the brethren, and put them out of the church (&nbsp; 3 John 1:9-10 ). </p> <p> Love and Judgment The judgment account in &nbsp;Matthew 25:31-46 illuminates and is illuminated by the New Testament teachings on love. The account depicts not only what happens at the end. The narrative makes plain that what happens at the end is what happens here and now. Christians love because they have been loved. In such love, God's eternal purposes are being experienced and carried out by his people (&nbsp; Matthew 25:34-36 ). </p> <p> [[Edgar]] V. McKnight </p>
       
== Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology <ref name="term_18034" /> ==
<p> God is love and has demonstrated that love in everything that he does. Paul compares faith, hope, and love, and concludes that "the greatest of these is love" (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:13 ). </p> <p> <i> "God Is Love."Agape </i> [ &nbsp; 1 John 4:8 ). God does not merely love; he <i> is </i> love. Everything that God does flows from his love. </p> <p> John emphasizes repeatedly that God the Father loves the Son (&nbsp;John 5:20; &nbsp;17:23,26 ) and that the Son loves the Father (&nbsp;John 14:31 ). Because the Father loves the Son, he made his will known to him. Jesus in turn demonstrated his love to the Father through his submission and obedience. </p> <p> The theme of the entire Bible is the self-revelation of the God of love. In the garden of Eden, God commanded that "you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die" (&nbsp;Genesis 2:17 ). We are not prepared, then, when God looks for Adam after his sin, calling out "Where are you?" God seeks Adam, not to put him to death, but to reestablish a relationship with him. God, the Lover, will not allow sin to stand between him and his creature. He personally bridges the gap. </p> <p> That seeking and bridging reaches its pinnacle when God sends his Son into the world to rescue sinners and to provide them with eternal life (&nbsp;John 3:16; &nbsp;Romans 5:7-8; &nbsp;Ephesians 2:1-5 ). John declares, "This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us" (&nbsp;1 John 3:16 ). God's love is not based on the merit of the recipient (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:7-8; &nbsp;Romans 5:7-8 ). Because he is love, God is not willing that any person should perish, but wills that everyone repent and live (&nbsp;Ezekiel 18:32; &nbsp;2 Peter 3:9 ). </p> <p> <i> "Love the Lord Your God." </i> We are totally incapable of loving either God or others—a condition that must be corrected by God before we can love. The Bible's ways of describing this process of correction are numerous: "circumcision of the heart" (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 30:6 ); God's "writing his laws" on our hearts (&nbsp;Jeremiah 31:33 ); God's substituting a "heart of flesh" for a "heart of stone" (&nbsp;Ezekiel 11:19 ); being "born again" by the Spirit (&nbsp;John 3:3; &nbsp;1 John 5:1-2 ); removing old clothing and replacing it with new (&nbsp;Colossians 3:12-14 ); dying to a sinful life and resurrecting to a new one (&nbsp;Colossians 3:1-4 ); moving out of darkness into light (&nbsp;1 John 2:9 ). Until that happens, we cannot love. </p> <p> God alone is the source of love (&nbsp;1 John 4:7-8 ); he "poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us" (&nbsp;Romans 5:5 ). God's love then awakens a response in those who accept it. God loves through believers, who act as channels for his love; they are branches who must abide in the vine if they are to have that love (&nbsp;John 15:1-11 ). We have the assurance that we have passed from death to life because we love others (&nbsp;1 John 3:14 ). </p> <p> Once we have received God's love as his children, he expects us to love. In fact, "Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love" (&nbsp;1 John 4:8 ). Jude urges his readers to keep themselves in God's love (v.21). </p> <p> <i> "Love the Lord Your God with All Your Heart." </i> Love of God is a response of the whole of the believerheart, soul, mind, and strength (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 6:5; &nbsp;Matthew 22:34-40; &nbsp;Mark 12:28-34 )to the whole of God. Jesus serves as the believer's model (&nbsp;John 14:21; &nbsp;Philippians 2:5-8 ). [[Obedience]] to God (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 6:7; &nbsp;7:9 ) and renunciation of the world-system (&nbsp;1 John 2:16 ) are critical elements of our love of God. </p> <p> Our love, however, is easily misdirected. Its object tends to become the creation rather than the Creator; it loses sight of the eternal for the temporal; it focuses on the self, often to the exclusion of God and others. We become idolaters, focusing a part or all of our love elsewhere. We are "love breakers" more than "law breakers." </p> <p> &nbsp;Genesis 22 presents a classic struggle: the conflicting pulls of love. [[Abraham]] loves Isaac, the son of his old age, the child of God's promise. But God tests his love. For the sake of the love of God, Abraham is willing to sacrifice the son he loves. Hisresponse is to a greater love. Jesus describes this conflict as hating father and mother in order to love and follow God (&nbsp; Luke 14:26 ). </p> <p> <i> "Love Your [[Neighbor]] as Yourself." </i> Love for neighbor is a decision that we make to treat others with respect and concern, to put the interests and safety of our neighbors on a level with our own. It demands a practical outworking in everyday lifeplacing a retaining wall around the roof to keep people from falling (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 22:8 ); not taking millstones in pledge, thus denying someone the ability to grind grain into flour (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 24:6 ); allowing the poor to glean leftovers from the orchards and fields (&nbsp;Leviticus 19:9-12 ). Our actions illustrate our love. Love for neighbor is "love in action, " doing something specific and tangible for others. </p> <p> The New Testament concept closely parallels that of the Old Testament. John writes: "Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth." [[Believers]] need to share with those in need, whether that need is for food, water, lodging, clothing, healing, or friendship (&nbsp;Matthew 25:34-40; &nbsp;Romans 12:13 ). The love demonstrated in the parable of the good Samaritan shows that <i> agape </i> [Ἀγάπη] love is not emotional love, but a response to someone who is in need. </p> <p> The command to love others is based on how God has loved us. Since believers have been the recipients of love, they must love. Since Christ has laid down his life for us, we must be willing to lay down our lives for our brothers (&nbsp;1 John 3:16 ). </p> <p> Many people in Jesus' day believed that a neighbor was a fellow Israelite. When asked to define "neighbor, " however, Jesus cited the parable of the good Samaritana person who knowingly crossed traditional boundaries to help a wounded Jew (&nbsp;Luke 10:29-37 ). A neighbor is anyone who is in need. Jesus also told his disciples that a "neighbor" might even be someone who hates them, curses them, or mistreats them. Yet they must love even enemies (&nbsp;Luke 6:27-36 ) as a witness and a testimony. </p> <p> The Old Testament charge was to "love your neighbor as yourself" (&nbsp;Leviticus 19:18 ). But Jesus gave his disciples a new command with a radically different motive: "Love each other as I have loved you" (&nbsp;John 15:12 ). Paul affirms that "the entire law is summed up in a single command: Love your neighbor as yourself'" (&nbsp;Galatians 5:14 ). James sees the command to love one another as a "royal law" (2:8). </p> <p> Love is the motivation for evangelism. Christ's love compels us to become ambassadors for Christ, with a ministry of reconciliation (&nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14 ). </p> <p> Glenn E. Schaefer </p> <p> <i> See also </i> [[Fruit Of The Spirit]]; [[New Command]] </p> <p> <i> Bibliography </i> . H. Bergman, <i> TDOT, </i> 1:99-118; E. Brunner, <i> Faith, Hope, and Love </i> ; E. J. Carnell, <i> BDT, </i> pp. 332-33; C. E. B. Cranfield, <i> A Theological Word Book of the Bible, </i> pp. 131-36; V. P. Furnish, <i> The Love [[Command]] in the New Testament </i> ; N. Glueck, <i> [[Hesed]] in the Bible </i> ; W. [[Gunther]] et al., <i> NIDNTT, </i> 2:538-51; H. W. Hoehner, <i> EDT, </i> pp. 656-59; C. S. Lewis, <i> The Four Loves </i> ; J. Moffatt, <i> Love in the New Testament </i> ; L. Morris, <i> Testaments of Love: A Study of Love in the Bible </i> ; G. Outka, <i> Agape: An Ethical Analysis </i> ; P. Perkins, <i> Love Commands in the New Testament </i> ; G. Quell and E. Stauffer, <i> TDNT, </i> 1:21-55; F. F. Segovia, <i> Love Relationships in the Johannine Tradition </i> ; G. A. Turner, <i> ISBE, </i> 3:173-76. </p>
       
== Vine's Expository Dictionary of NT Words <ref name="term_78291" /> ==
<div> '''A — 1: ἀγαπάω ''' (Strong'S #25 — Verb — agapao — ag-ap-ah'-o ) </div> <p> and the corresponding noun agape (B, No. 1 below) present "the characteristic word of Christianity, and since the Spirit of revelation has used it to express ideas previously unknown, inquiry into its use, whether in Greek literature or in the Septuagint, throws but little light upon its distinctive meaning in the NT. Cp., however, &nbsp;Leviticus 19:18; &nbsp;Deuteronomy 6:5 . </p> &nbsp;John 17:26&nbsp;John 3:16&nbsp;Romans 5:8&nbsp;John 14:21&nbsp;John 13:34&nbsp;1 Thessalonians 3:12&nbsp;1 Corinthians 16:14&nbsp;2 Peter 1:7&nbsp;1 John 4:8&nbsp;1 John 4:9,10&nbsp;Romans 5:8&nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:7,8&nbsp;2 Corinthians 5:14&nbsp;Ephesians 2:4&nbsp;3:19&nbsp;5:2&nbsp;Galatians 5:22&nbsp;John 14:15,21,23&nbsp;15:10&nbsp;1 John 2:5&nbsp;5:3&nbsp;2 John 1:6&nbsp;Romans 15:2&nbsp;Galatians 6:10&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13&nbsp; Colossians 3:12-14Beloved. <div> '''A — 2: φιλέω ''' (Strong'S #5368 — Verb — phileo — fil-eh'-o ) </div> <p> is to be distinguished from agapao in this, that phileo more nearly represents "tender affection." The two words are used for the "love" of the Father for the Son, &nbsp;John 3:35 (No. 1); 5:20 (No. 2); for the believer, &nbsp; John 14:21 (No. 1); 16:27 (No. 2); both, of Christ's "love" for a certain disciple, &nbsp; John 13:23 (No. 1); 20:2 (No. 2). Yet the distinction between the two verbs remains, and they are never used indiscriminately in the same passage; if each is used with reference to the same objects, as just mentioned, each word retains its distinctive and essential character. </p> &nbsp;1 Corinthians 16;22&nbsp;Matthew 22:37&nbsp;Luke 10:27&nbsp;Romans 8:28&nbsp;1 Corinthians 8:3&nbsp;1 Peter 1:8&nbsp;1 John 4:21&nbsp;John 21:15-17&nbsp;Revelation 12:11&nbsp;John 12:25&nbsp;1 Peter 3:10&nbsp;Mark 12:38 <div> '''B — 1: ἀγάπη ''' (Strong'S #26 — Noun [[Feminine]] — agape — ag-ah'-pay ) </div> <p> the significance of which has been pointed out in connection with A, No. 1, is always rendered "love" in the RV where the AV has "charity," a rendering nowhere used in the RV; in &nbsp;Romans 14:15 , where the AV has "charitably," the RV, adhering to the translation of the noun, has "in love." </p> &nbsp;1 John 4:8,16&nbsp;1 John 4:9,10&nbsp;1 John 4:17 <div> '''B — 2: φιλανθρωπία ''' (Strong'S #5363 — Noun Feminine — philanthropia — fil-an-thro-pee'-ah ) </div> <p> denotes, lit., "love for man" (phileo and anthropos, "man"); hence, "kindness," &nbsp;Acts 28:2; in &nbsp;Titus 3:4 , "(His) love toward man." Cp. the adverb philanthropos, "humanely, kindly," &nbsp;Acts 27:3 . See Kindness. </p> &nbsp;1 Timothy 6:10[[Brother]]
       
== Vine's Expository Dictionary of OT Words <ref name="term_76401" /> ==
<p> '''A. Verb. ''' </p> <p> <em> 'Âhab </em> (אַהֵב, Strong'S #157), or <em> 'Âhêb </em> (אַהֵב, Strong'S #157), “to love; like.” This verb occurs in [[Moabite]] and Ugaritic. It appears in all periods of Hebrew and around 250 times in the Bible. </p> <p> Basically this verb is equivalent to the English “to love” in the sense of having a strong emotional attachment to and desire either to possess or to be in the presence of the object. First, the word refers to the love a man has for a woman and a woman for a man. Such love is rooted in sexual desire, although as a rule it is desire within the bounds of lawful relationships: “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her …” (Gen. 24:67). This word may refer to an erotic but legal love outside marriage. Such an emotion may be a desire to marry and care for the object of that love, as in the case of Shechem’s love for [[Dinah]] (Gen. 34:3). In a very few instances <em> 'âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) may signify no more than pure lust—an inordinate desire to have sexual relations with its object (cf. 2 Sam. 13:1). Marriage may be consummated without the presence of love for one’s marriage partner (Gen. 29:30). </p> <p> <em> 'Âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) seldom refers to making love (usually this is represented <em> yada’ </em> , “to know,” or by <em> shakab </em> , “to lie with”). The word does seem to have this added meaning, however, in 1 Kings 11:1: “But King Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of [[Pharaoh]] …” (cf. Jer. 2:25). Hosea appears to use this nuance when he writes that God told him to “go yet, love a woman beloved of her friend, yet an adulteress …” (3:1). This is the predominant meaning of the verb when it appears in the causative stem (as a participle). In every instance except one (Zech. 13:6) <em> 'âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) signifies those with whom one has made or intends to make love: “Go up to Lebanon, and cry; and lift up thy voice in Bashan, and cry from the passages: for all thy lovers are destroyed” (Jer. 22:20; cf. Ezek. 16:33). <em> 'Âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) is also used of the love between parents and their children. In its first biblical appearance, the word represents Abraham’s special attachment to his son Isaac: “And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest …” (Gen. 22:2). <em> 'Âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) may refer to the family love experienced by a daughter-in-law toward her mother-in-law (Ruth 4:15). This kind of love is also represented by the word <em> racham </em> <em> 'Âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) sometimes depicts a special strong attachment a servant may have toward a master under whose dominance he wishes to remain: “And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free …” (Exod. 21:5). Perhaps there is an overtone here of family love; he “loves” his master as a son “loves” his father (cf. Deut. 15:16). This emphasis may be in 1 Sam. 16:21, where we read that Saul “loved [David] greatly.” Israel came “to love” and deeply admire David so that they watched his every move with admiration (1 Sam. 18:16). </p> <p> A special use of this word relates to an especially close attachment of friends: “… The soul of [[Jonathan]] was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul” (1 Sam. 18:1). In Lev. 19:18: “… Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself..” (cf. Lev. 19:34; Deut. 10:19) <em> 'âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) signifies this brotherly or friendly kind of love. The word suggests, furthermore, that one seek to relate to his brother and all men according to what is specified in the law structure God gave to Israel. This was to be the normal state of affairs between men. </p> <p> This verb is used politically to describe the loyalty of a vassal or a subordinate to his lord— so [[Hiram]] of [[Tyre]] “loved” David in the sense that he was completely loyal (1 Kings 5:1). </p> <p> The strong emotional attachment and desire suggested by <em> 'âhab </em> (or <em> 'âhêb </em> ) may also be fixed on objects, circumstances, actions, and relationships. </p> <p> '''B. Noun. ''' </p> <p> <em> 'Ahăbâh </em> (אַהֲבָה, Strong'S #160), “love.” This word appears about 55 times, and it represents several kinds of “love.” The first biblical occurrence of <em> 'ahăbâh </em> is in Gen. 29:20; there the word deals with the “love” between man and wife as a general concept. In Hos. 3:1 the word is used of “love” as a sexual activity. <em> 'Ahăbâh </em> means “love” between friends in 1 Sam. 18:3: “Then Jonathan and David made a covenant because he loved him as his own soul.” The word refers to Solomon’s “love” in 1 Kings 11:2 and to God’s “love” in Deut. 7:8. </p> <p> '''C. Participle. ''' </p> <p> <em> 'Âhab </em> (אַהֵב, Strong'S #157), “friend.” This word used as a participle may mean “friend”: “… The rich hath many friends” (Prov. 14:20). </p>
       
== King James Dictionary <ref name="term_61319" /> ==
<p> LOVE, luv. L. libeo, lubeo. See Lief. The sense is probably to be prompt, free, willing, from leaning, advancing, or drawing forward. </p> 1. In a general sense to be pleased with to regard with affection, on account of some qualities which excite pleasing sensations or desire of gratification. We love a friend, on account of some qualities which give us pleasure in his society. We love a man who has done us a favor in which case, gratitude enters into the composition of our affection. We love our parents and our children, on account of their connection with us, and on account of many qualities which please us. We love to retire to a cool shade in summer. We love a warm room in winter. we love to hear an eloquent advocate. The christian loves his Bible. In short, we love whatever gives us pleasure and delight, whether animal or intellectual and if our hearts are right, we love God above all things, as the sum of all excellence and all the attributes which can communicate happiness to intelligent beings. In other words, the christian loves God with the love of complacency in his attributes, the love of benevolence towards the interest of his kingdom, and the love of gratitude for favors received. <p> Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind - </p> <p> Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. &nbsp;Matthew 22 . </p> 2. To have benevolence or good will for. &nbsp;John 3 . <p> LOVE, n. </p> 1. An affection of the mind excited by beauty and worth of any kind, or by the qualities of an object which communicate pleasure, sensual or intellectual. It is opposed to hatred. Love between the sexes, is a compound affection, consisting of esteem, benevolence, and animal desire. Love is excited by pleasing qualities of any kind, as by kindness, benevolence, charity, and by the qualities which render social intercourse agreeable. In the latter case, love is ardent friendship, or a strong attachment springing from good will and esteem, and the pleasure derived from the company, civilities and kindness of others. <p> Between certain natural relatives, love seems to be in some cases instinctive. Such is the love of a mother for her child, which manifests itself toward an infant, before any particular qualities in the child are unfolded. This affection is apparently as strong in irrational animals as in human beings. </p> <p> We speak of the love of amusements, the love of books, the love of money, and the love of whatever contributes to our pleasure or supposed profit. </p> <p> The love of God is the first duty of man, and this springs from just views of his attributes or excellencies of character, which afford the highest delight to the sanctified heart. [[Esteem]] and reverence constitute ingredients in this affection, and a fear of offending him is its inseparable effect. </p> 2. Courtship chiefly in the phrase, to make love, that is, to court to woo to solicit union in marriage. 3. Patriotism the attachment one has to his native land as the love of country. 4. [[Benevolence]] good will. <p> God is love. &nbsp;1 John 4 . </p> 5. The object beloved. <p> The lover and the love of human kind. </p> 6. A word of endearment. <p> [[Trust]] me, love. </p> 7. Picturesque representation of love. <p> Such was his form as painters, when they show their utmost art, on naked loves bestow. </p> 8. Lewdness. <p> He is not lolling on a lewd love-bed. </p> 9. A thin silk stuff. Obs. <p> Love in idleness, a kind of violet. </p> <p> Free of love, a plant of the genus Cercis. </p>
       
== Fausset's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_36368" /> ==
<p> "The fulfilling of the law" (&nbsp;Romans 13:8; &nbsp;Romans 13:10), the prominent perfection of God (&nbsp;1 John 4:8; &nbsp;1 John 4:16), manifested to us (&nbsp;1 John 4:10) when we loved not Him (&nbsp;John 3:16). Passing our powers of knowledge (&nbsp;Ephesians 3:19), everlasting (&nbsp;Jeremiah 31:3), free and gratuitous (&nbsp;Hosea 14:4), enduring to the end (&nbsp;John 13:1). The two Greek words for "love" are distinct: phileo , the love of impulse, ardent affection and feeling; agapao , the love of esteem, regard. &nbsp;John 21:15, "Simon, lovest (agapas , esteemest) thou Me?" Αgapas sounds too cold to Peter, now burning with love; so he replies, "Thou knowest that I LOVE (philo ) Thee." "Simon, esteemest thou (agapas ) Me? ... Thou knowest that I LOVE Thee." At the third time Peter gained his point. "Simon, LOVEST (phileis ) thou Me?" Love to one another is the proof to the world of discipleship (&nbsp;John 13:35). </p>
       
== American Tract Society Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_16583" /> ==
<p> GOD IS LOVE; AND HE THAT DWELLETH IN LOVE DWELLETH IN GOD, AND GOD IN HIM, &nbsp;1 John 4:16 . Love is a chief attribute of Jehovah, the length and breadth and height and depth of which are beyond comprehension, for they are infinite, &nbsp;Ephesians 3:18,19 . Between the three [[Persons]] of the Godhead, love is unutterable full, perfect, and blissful; towards holy angels and Christians, God's love is an infinite fatherly complacency and affection; towards sinners, it is immeasurable compassion. It is shown in all his works and ways, and dictated his holy law, but is most signally displayed in the gospel, &nbsp;John 3:16 . "Herein is love." </p> <p> Holy love in man would make the whole heart and soul supremely delight in and obey God, and cordially and practically love all beings according to their character-the good with fellowship of soul, and the evil with a Christ-like benevolence. Such a love would meet and fulfil all the ends of the law, &nbsp;Matthew 22:37-40 &nbsp; Romans 13:8-10 . Without it, none can enter heaven; and as the affections of every unrenewed heart are all mixed with sin, being given to forbidden objects, or selfishly and unduly given to objects not forbidden, we must be "born again" in order to see God, &nbsp;John 3:3 &nbsp; 1 John 4:7,19 &nbsp; 5:4 . </p>
       
== People's Dictionary of the Bible <ref name="term_70430" /> ==
<p> '''Love Feasts,''' ''Agapè'' . &nbsp;Judges 1:12; &nbsp;2 Peter 2:13. A meeting accompanying the Lord's Supper in which the poorer members of the church were provided for by the contributions of Christians, but whether before or after the celebration is uncertain. Chrysostom says that after the early community of goods had ceased, the richer members brought to the church contributions of food and drink, of which, after the conclusion of the services and the celebration of the Lord's Supper, all partook together, by this means helping to promote the principle of love among Christians. The love feasts were forbidden to be held in churches by the [[Council]] of Laodicea, a.d. 320; but in some form or other they have been continued in some churches. </p>
       
== Charles Buck Theological Dictionary <ref name="term_20079" /> ==
<p> Consists in approbation of, and inclination towards an object that appears to us as good. It has been distinguished into, </p> <p> 1. Love of esteem, which arises from the mere consideration of some excellency in an object, and belongs either to persons or things.— </p> <p> 2. Love of benevolence, which is an inclination to seek the happiness or welfare of any thing.— </p> <p> 3. Love of complacence, which arises from the consideration of any object agreeable to us, and calculated to afford us pleasure. </p>
       
== Webster's Dictionary <ref name="term_140374" /> ==
<p> '''(1):''' ''' (''' n.) A boxing glove. </p> <p> '''(2):''' ''' (''' v. t.) To cover with, or as with, a glove. </p> <p> '''(3):''' ''' (''' n.) A cover for the hand, or for the hand and wrist, with a separate sheath for each finger. The latter characteristic distinguishes the glove from the mitten. </p>
       
== Easton's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_32431" /> ==
&nbsp;John 21:16,17 <i> Agapas </i> <i> Philo </i> <i> Agapan </i> <i> Philein </i> <p> In &nbsp; 1 Corinthians 13 the apostle sets forth the excellency of love, as the word "charity" there is rendered in the Revised Version. </p>
       
== International Standard Bible Encyclopedia <ref name="term_5903" /> ==
<p> ''''' luv ''''' ( אהב , <i> ''''' 'āhēbh ''''' </i> , אהבה , <i> ''''' 'ahăbhāh ''''' </i> , noun; φιλέω , <i> ''''' philéō ''''' </i> , ἀγαπάω , <i> ''''' agapáō ''''' </i> , verb; ἀγάπη , <i> ''''' agápē ''''' </i> , noun): Love to both God and man is fundamental to true religion, whether as expressed in the Old Testament or the New Testament. Jesus Himself declared that all the law and the prophets hang upon love (&nbsp; Matthew 22:40; &nbsp;Mark 12:28-34 ). Paul, in his matchless ode on love (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:1-13 ), makes it the greatest of the graces of the Christian life - greater than speaking with tongues, or the gift of prophecy, or the possession of a faith of superior excellence; for without love all these gifts and graces, desirable and useful as they are in themselves, are as nothing, certainly of no permanent value in the sight of God. Not that either Jesus or Paul underestimates the faith from which all the graces proceed, for this grace is recognized as fundamental in all God's dealings with man and man's dealings with God (&nbsp;John 6:28 f; &nbsp; Hebrews 11:6 ); but both alike count that faith as but idle and worthless belief that does not manifest itself in love to both God and man. As love is the highest expression of God and His relation to mankind, so it must be the highest expression of man's relation to his Maker and to his fellow-man. </p> I. Definition. <p> While the Hebrew and Greek words for "love" have various shades and intensities of meaning, they may be summed up in some such definition as this: Love, whether used of God or man, is an earnest and anxious desire for and an active and beneficent interest ins the well-being of the one loved. Different degrees and manifestations of this affection are recognized in the [[Scriptures]] according to the circumstances and relations of life, e.g. the expression of love as between husband and wife, parent and child, brethren according to the flesh, and according to grace; between friend and enemy, and, finally, between God and man. It must not be overlooked, however, that the fundamental idea of love as expressed in the definition of it is never absent in any one of these relations of life, even though the manifestation thereof may differ according to the circumstances and relations. Christ's interview with the apostle Peter on the shore of the Sea of [[Tiberias]] (&nbsp;John 21:15-18 ) sets before us in a most beautiful way the different shades of meaning as found in the New Testament words φιλέω , <i> '''''philéō''''' </i> , and ἀγαπάω , <i> '''''agapáō''''' </i> . In the question of Christ, "Lovest thou me more than these?" the Greek verb ἀαπᾶς , <i> '''''agapás''''' </i> , denotes the highest, most perfect kind of love (Latin, <i> diligere </i> ), implying a clear determination of will and judgment, and belonging particularly to the sphere of Divine revelation. In his answer Peter substitutes the word φιλῶ , <i> '''''philṓ''''' </i> , which means the natural human affection, with its strong feeling, or sentiment, and is never used in Scripture language to designate man's love to God. While the answer of Peter, then, claims only an inferior kind of love, as compared to the one contained in Christ's question, he nevertheless is confident of possessing at least such love for his Lord. </p> II. The Love of God. <p> First in the consideration of the subject of "love" comes the love of God - H e who is love, and from whom all love is derived. The love of God is that part of His nature - indeed His whole nature, for "God is love" - which leads Him to express Himself in terms of endearment toward His creatures, and actively to manifest that interest and affection in acts of loving care and self-sacrifice in behalf of the objects of His love. God is "love" (&nbsp;1 John 4:8 , &nbsp;1 John 4:16 ) just as truly as He is "light" (&nbsp;1 John 1:5 ), "truth" (&nbsp;1 John 1:6 ), and "spirit" (&nbsp;John 4:24 ). Spirit and light are expressions of His essential nature; love is the expression of His personality corresponding to His nature. God not merely loves, but is love; it is His very nature, and He imparts this nature to be the sphere in which His children dwell, for "he that abideth in love abideth in God, and God abideth in him" (&nbsp;1 John 4:16 ). Christianity is the only religion that sets forth the [[Supreme]] Being as Love. In heathen religions He is set forth as an angry being and in constant need of appeasing. </p> <p> <b> 1. [[Objects]] of God's Love: </b> </p> <p> The object of God's love is first and foremost <i> His own Son, Jesus Christ </i> (&nbsp; Matthew 3:17; &nbsp;Matthew 17:5; &nbsp;Luke 20:13; &nbsp;John 17:24 ). The Son shares the love of the Father in a unique sense; He is "my chosen, in whom my soul delighteth" (&nbsp;Isaiah 42:1 ). There exists an eternal affection between the Son and the Father - the Son is the original and eternal object of the Father's love (&nbsp;John 17:24 ). If God's love is eternal it must have an eternal object, hence, Christ is an eternal being. </p> <p> God loves <i> the believer in His Son </i> with a special love. Those who are united by faith and love to Jesus Christ are, in a different sense from those who are not thus united, the special objects of God's love. [[Said]] Jesus, thou "lovedst them, even as thou lovedst me" (&nbsp; John 17:23 ). Christ is referring to the fact that, just as the disciples had received the same treatment from the world that He had received, so they had received of the Father the same love that He Himself had received. They were not on the outskirts of God's love, but in the very center of it. "For the father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me" (&nbsp;John 16:27 ). Here <i> '''''phileō''''' </i> is used for love, indicating the fatherly affection of God for the believer in Christ, His Son. This is love in a more intense form than that spoken of for the world (&nbsp;John 3:16 ). </p> <p> God loves <i> the world </i> (&nbsp; John 3:16; compare &nbsp;1 Timothy 2:4; &nbsp;2 Peter 3:9 ). This is a wonderful truth when we realize what a world this is - a world of sin and corruption. This was a startling truth for [[Nicodemus]] to learn, who conceived of God as loving only the Jewish nation. To him, in his narrow exclusiveism, the announcement of the fact that God loved the whole world of men was startling. God loves the world of sinners lost and ruined by the fall. Yet it is this world, "weak," "ungodly," "without strength," "sinners" (&nbsp;Romans 5:6-8 ), "dead in trespasses and sins" (&nbsp;Ephesians 2:1 the King James Version), and unrighteous, that God so loved that He gave His only begotten Son in order to redeem it. The genesis of man's salvation lies in the love and mercy of God (&nbsp; Ephesians 2:4 f). But love is more than mercy or compassion; it is active and identifies itself with its object. The love of the heavenly Father over the return of His wandering children is beautifully set forth in the parable of the Prodigal Son (Lk 15). Nor should the fact be overlooked that God loves not only the whole world, but each individual in it; it is a special as well as a general love (&nbsp; John 3:16 , "whosoever"; &nbsp;Galatians 2:20 , "loved me, and gave himself up for me"). </p> <p> <b> 2. Manifestations of God's Love: </b> </p> <p> God's love is manifested by providing for the physical, mental, moral and spiritual needs of His people (&nbsp;Isaiah 48:14 , &nbsp;Isaiah 48:20 , &nbsp;Isaiah 48:21; &nbsp;Isaiah 62:9-12; &nbsp;Isaiah 63:3 , &nbsp;Isaiah 63:12 ). In these Scriptures God is seen manifesting His power in behalf His people in the time of their wilderness journeying and their captivity. He led them, fed and clothed them, guided them and protected them from all their enemies. His love was again shown in feeling with His people, their sorrows and afflictions (&nbsp;Isaiah 63:9 ); He suffered in their affliction, their interests were His; He was not their adversary but their friend, even though it might have seemed to them as if He either had brought on them their suffering or did not care about it. Nor did He ever forget them for a moment during all their trials. They thought He did; they said, "God hath forgotten us," "He hath forgotten to be gracious"; but no; a mother might forget her child that she should not have compassion on it, but God would never forget His people. How could He? Had He not graven them upon the palms of His hands (&nbsp;Isaiah 49:15 f)? Rather than His love being absent in the chastisement of His people, the chastisement itself was often a proof of the presence of the Divine love, "for whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth" (&nbsp; Hebrews 12:6-11 ). Loving reproof and chastisement are necessary oftentimes for growth in holiness and righteousness. Our redemption from sin is to be attributed to God's wondrous love; "Thou hast in love to my soul delivered it from the pit of corruption; for thou hast cast all my sins behind thy back" (&nbsp;Isaiah 38:17; compare &nbsp;Psalm 50:21; &nbsp;Psalm 90:8 ). &nbsp;Ephesians 2:4 f sets forth in a wonderful way how our entire salvation springs forth from _ the mercy and love of God; "But God, being rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead through our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ," etc. It is because of the love of the Father that we are granted a place in the heavenly kingdom (&nbsp; Ephesians 2:6-8 ). But the supreme manifestation of the love of God, as set forth in the Scripture, is that expressed in the gift of His only-begotten Son to die for the sins of the world (&nbsp;John 3:16; &nbsp;Romans 5:6-8; &nbsp;1 John 4:9 f), and through whom the sinful and sinning but repentant sons of men are taken into the family of God, and receive the adoption of sons (&nbsp; 1 John 3:1 f; &nbsp; Galatians 4:4-6 ). From this wonderful love of God in Christ Jesus nothing in heaven or earth or hell, created or uncreated or to be created, shall be able to separate us (&nbsp;Romans 8:37 f). </p> III. The Love of Man. <p> <b> 1. Source of Man's Love: </b> </p> <p> Whatever love there is in man, whether it be toward God or toward his fellowman, has its source in God - "Love is of God; and every one that loveth is begotten of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love" (&nbsp;1 John 4:7 f); "We love, because he first loved us" (&nbsp; 1 John 4:19 ). Trench, in speaking of <i> '''''agapē''''' </i> , says it is a word born within the bosom of revealed religion. [[Heathen]] writers do not use it at all, their nearest approach to it being <i> '''''philanthropı́a''''' </i> or <i> '''''philadelphia''''' </i> - the love betweeen those of the same blood. Love in the heart of man is the offspring of the love of God. Only the regenerated heart can truly love as God loves; to this higher form of love the unregenerate can lay no claim (&nbsp;1 John 4:7 , &nbsp;1 John 4:19 , &nbsp;1 John 4:21; &nbsp;1 John 2:7-11; &nbsp;1 John 3:10; &nbsp;1 John 4:11 f). The regenerate man is able to see his fellow-man as God sees him, value him as God values him, not so much because of what he is by reason of his sin and unloveliness, but because of what, through Christ, he may become; he sees man's intrinsic worth and possibility in Christ (&nbsp; 2 Corinthians 5:14-17 ). This love is also created in the heart of man by the Holy Ghost (&nbsp;Romans 5:5 ), and is a fruit of the Spirit (&nbsp;Galatians 5:22 ). It is also stimulated by the example of the Lord Jesus Christ, who, more than anyone else, manifested to the world the spirit and nature of true love (&nbsp;John 13:34; &nbsp;John 15:12; &nbsp;Galatians 2:20; &nbsp;Ephesians 5:25-27; &nbsp;1 John 4:9 f). </p> <p> <b> 2. Objects of Man's Love: </b> </p> <p> God must be the first and supreme object of man's love; He must be loved with all the heart, mind, soul and strength (&nbsp;Matthew 22:37 f; &nbsp; Mark 12:29-34 ). In this last passage the exhortation to supreme love to God is connected with the doctrine of the unity of God (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 6:4 f) - inasmuch as the Divine Being is one and indivisible, so must our love to Him be undivided. Our love to God is shown in the keeping of His commandments (&nbsp; Exodus 20:6; &nbsp;1 John 5:3; &nbsp;2 John 1:6 ). Love is here set forth as more than a mere affection or sentiment; it is something that manifests itself, not only in obedience to known Divine commands, but also in a protecting and defense of them, and a seeking to know more and more of the will of God in order to express love for God in further obedience (compare &nbsp;Deuteronomy 10:12 ). Those who love God will hate evil and all forms of worldliness, as expressed in the avoidance of the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh and the pride of life (&nbsp;Psalm 97:10; &nbsp;1 John 2:15-17 ). Whatever there may be in his surroundings that would draw the soul away from God and righteousness, that the child of God will avoid. Christ, being God, also claims the first place in our affections. He is to be chosen before father or mother, parent, or child, brother or sister, or friend (&nbsp;Matthew 10:35-38; &nbsp;Luke 14:26 ). The word "hate" in these passages does not mean to hate in the sense in which we use the word today. It is used in the sense in which Jacob is said to have "hated" [[Leah]] (&nbsp;Genesis 29:31 ), that is, he loved her less than Rachel; "He loved also Rachel more than Leah" (&nbsp;Genesis 29:30 ). To love Christ supremely is the test of true discipleship (&nbsp;Luke 14:26 ), and is an unfailing mark of the elect (&nbsp;1 Peter 1:8 ). We prove that we are really God's children by thus loving His Son (&nbsp;John 8:42 ). [[Absence]] of such love means, finally, eternal separation (&nbsp;1 Corinthians 16:22 ). </p> <p> Man must love his fellow-man also. Love for the brotherhood is a natural consequence of the love of the fatherhood; for "In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother" (&nbsp;1 John 3:10 ). For a man to say "I love God" and yet hate his fellowman is to brand himself as "a liar" (&nbsp;1 John 4:20 ); "He that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, cannot love God whom he hath not seen" (&nbsp;1 John 4:20 ); he that loveth God will love his brother also (&nbsp;1 John 4:21 ). The degree in which we are to love our fellow-man is "as thyself" (&nbsp;Matthew 22:39 ), according to the strict observance of law. Christ set before His followers a much higher example than that, however. According to the teaching of Jesus we are to supersede this standard: "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another; even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another" (&nbsp;John 13:34 ). The exhibition of love of this character toward our fellow-man is the badge of true discipleship. It may be called the sum total of our duty toward our fellow-man, for "Love worketh no ill to his neighbor: love therefore is the fulfillment of the law"; "for he that loveth his neighbor hath fulfilled the law" (&nbsp;Romans 13:8 , &nbsp;Romans 13:10 ). The qualities which should characterize the love which we are to manifest toward our fellow-men are beautifully set forth in &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:1-13 . It is patient and without envy; it is not proud or self-elated, neither does it behave discourteously; it does not cherish evil, but keeps good account of the good; it rejoices not at the downfall of an enemy or competitor, but gladly hails his success; it is hopeful, trustful and forbearing - for such there is no law, for they need none; they have fulfilled the law. </p> <p> Nor should it be overlooked that our Lord commanded His children to love their enemies, those who spoke evil of them, and despitefully used them (&nbsp;Matthew 5:43-48 ). They were not to render evil for evil, but contrariwise, blessing. The love of the disciple of Christ must manifest itself in supplying the necessities, not of our friends only (&nbsp;1 John 3:16-18 ), but also of our enemies (&nbsp;Romans 12:20 f). </p> <p> Our love should be "without hypocrisy" (&nbsp;Romans 12:9 ); there should be no pretense about it; it should not be a thing of mere word or tongue, but a real experience manifesting itself in deed and truth (&nbsp;1 John 3:18 ). True love will find its expression in service to man: "Through love be servants one to another" (&nbsp;Galatians 5:13 ). What more wonderful illustration can be found of ministering love than that set forth by our Lord in the ministry of foot-washing as found in Jn 13? Love bears the infirmities of the weak, does not please itself, but seeks the welfare of others (&nbsp;Romans 15:1-3; &nbsp;Philippians 2:21; &nbsp;Galatians 6:2; &nbsp;1 Corinthians 10:24 ); it surrenders things which may be innocent in themselves but which nevertheless may become a stumbling-block to others (&nbsp;Romans 14:15 , &nbsp;Romans 14:21 ); it gladly forgives injuries (&nbsp;Ephesians 4:32 ), and gives the place of honor to another (&nbsp;Romans 12:10 ). What, then, is more vital than to possess such love? It is the fulfillment of the royal law (&nbsp;James 2:8 ), and is to be put above everything else (&nbsp;Colossians 3:14 ); it is the binder that holds all the other graces of the Christian life in place (&nbsp;Colossians 3:14 ); by the possession of such love we know that we have passed from death unto life (&nbsp;1 John 3:14 ), and it is the supreme test of our abiding in God and God in us (&nbsp;1 John 4:12 , &nbsp;1 John 4:16 ). </p>
       
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_48794" /> ==
<p> (prop. אִהֲבָה, ἀγάπη ) is an attachment of the affections to any object, accompanied with an ardent desire to promote its happiness: 1, by abstaining from all that could prove injurious to it; 2, by doing all that call promote its welfare, comfort, or interests, whether it is indifferent to these efforts, or whether it appreciates them. This is what Kant calls practical love, in contradistinction from pathological love, which is a sort of sensual self-love, and a desire for community in compliance with our own feelings. In reality, love is something personal, emanating from a personal being and directed towards another, and thus its moral or immoral character is determined by the fact of its being called forth by the real worth of the personality towards which it is directed, or by the physical appearance of the latter, or by the advantages it may offer. </p> <p> In the Christian sense, as we find it spoken of in the Word of God, love is not merely a peculiar disposition of the feelings, or a direction of the will of the creature, though this also must have its root in the creative principle, in God. God is love, the original, absolute love (&nbsp;1 John 4:9). As the absolute love, he is at once subject and object, i.e., he originally loved himself, had communion with himself, imparted himself to himself, as also we see mention made of God's love before the creation of the world, the love of the Father towards the Son (&nbsp;John 17:24), Derived from this love is the love which calls into being and preserves his creatures. Creatures, that is, existences which come from God, are through him and for him; not having life by themselves, but immediately dependent upon God existing by his will, and consequently to be destroyed at his will; created in time, and consequently subject to time, developing themselves in it to the full extent of their nature according to God's thoughts, with the possibility of departing therefrom, which it were impossible to suppose of God, the eternally real and active idea of himself. In regard to the creature, the divine love is the will of God to communicate to it the fullness of his life, and even the will to impart, according to its receptive faculty, this fullness into something which is not himself, yet which, as coming from God, tends also towards God, and finds its rest in him, and its happiness in doing his will. But, as emanating from an active God this love, with all its fullness, can only be directed towards a similarly organized and consequently personal creature, conscious of its relation to God and of himself as its end, possessing in itself the fullness of created life (microcosm). </p> <p> It must, then, be man towards whom this divine love is directed as the object of God's delight, created after his image. This love is manifested in the earnestness of the discipline (commands and threats, &nbsp;Genesis 2:17) employed to strengthen this resemblance to God, to educate man as a ruler by obedience, as also by the intercourse of God with man; and, after the fall, by the hope and confidence awakening promises, as well as in the humiliating condemnation to pain, labor, and death. All these contain evidences of love, of this will of God to hold man in his communion, or to restore him to it. At the bottom of it lies an appreciation of his worth, namely, of his inalienable resemblance to God, of the imparted divine breath. This appreciation is also the foundation of compassionate love, for it is only on this ground that man is worthy of the divine affection. But it is also the ground which renders him deserving of punishment. For punishment, this destiny of evil, which is felt as a hinderance of life, is in one respect an expiation, i.e. a retrieving of God's honor, being incurred by that disregard of the value of his communion with God, and consequently of the real life, which must be considered as injurious to the life of man, and leading him to ruin; on the other hand, it is inducement to conversion, as this consequence of sin leads man to recognize the restoration of this disturbed relation to God as the one thing needful and desirable. [[Punishment]] consequently proceeds in both cases on the assumption of the worth of man in the eve of God, and is a proof of it. Hence the anger of God, as manifested by these punishments, is but another form of his love. It is a reaction of rejected love which manifests itself in imparting suffering and pain on the one who rejects it, proving thereby that its rejection is not a matter of indifference to it. This love may not be apparent at first sight, but it is clearly revealed in God's conduct towards all mankind, as well towards the heathen as towards the chosen people. God allowed the heathen to walk in their own ways (&nbsp;Acts 14:17); he allows them to fall into all manner of evil (&nbsp;Romans 1:21 sq.) in order to bring them to a sense of their misery and helplessness as well as of their guilt. But at the bottom of this anger there is still love, and this is clearly shown in the fact that he manifested himself to them in their conscience, and also took care of them (&nbsp;Acts 14:17; &nbsp;Acts 17:25 sq.). </p> <p> But, if this love is thus evinced towards the heathen, it is still more clearly manifested towards the chosen people, the fact of their choice being itself a manifestation of that love (&nbsp;Deuteronomy 7:6 sq.), which is further shown both in the blessings and punishments, the anger and the mercy, of which they were the objects. [[Holiness]] and mercy are the chief characteristics of the divine love as manifested towards Israel; the one raising them above their weaknesess, their evils, and their sins; the other understanding these failings, and seeking to deliver and restore them. But in both also is manifested the constancy of that love, its faithfulness; and the exactitude with which it adheres to the covenant it had itself made evinces its righteousness by saving those who fear God and obey his commandments. Both holiness and mercy are, for the moral, religious consciousness, harmonized in the expiatory sacrifice, in a figurative, typical manner in the O.T., and in a real, absolute manner in the N.T. The divine right in regard to fallen humanity is maintained, the death penalty is paid, but in such a manner that the chief of all, the divine Son of man, who is also Son of God, suffers it for all, of his own free will, and out of love to man, in accordance with the wishes of his Father. Thus the curse of sin and death is removed from humanity, and the possibility of a new existence of righteousness and felicity restored. </p> <p> The New Covenant is therefore the full revelation of the spirit and object of the divine love. The incarnation of the Son of God is the revelation of God himself, and leads to his self-impartation by the Holy Spirit. Hence the eternal love discloses itself as being, in its inner nature, the love of the Father for the Son, and of the Son for the Father by the Holy Ghost, which proceeds from both, and is the fullness of the love that unites them, whence we can say that. God is love; as also, in its manifestation, it is the divine love towards fallen creatures, which is the will to restore their perfect communion with God by means of the all-sufficient expiatory sacrifice of the God-man, and the communication of the Holy Spirit, by which both the Father and the Son come to dwell in the hearts of men, thus forming a people of God's own, as was postulated, but not yet realized in the O.T. The love of God in man, therefore, is the consciousness of being loved by God (&nbsp;Romans 5:5), resulting in a powerful impulse of love towards the God who has loved us first in Christ (&nbsp;1 John 4:19), and an inward and strong affection towards all who are loved by God in Christ (&nbsp;1 John 4:11); for the divine love, even when dwelling in man, remains all- embracing. This love takes the form of a duty (&nbsp;1 John 4:11), but at the same time becomes a gradually strengthening inclination. And this is the completion or the ripening of the divine love in man (ἐν τούτῳ τετελείωται ), that it manifests itself in positive results for the advantage of others. </p> <p> We find the beginning and examples of this love under the old dispensation where mention is made of desire after God, joy in him, eagerness to serve him, zeal in doing everything to please and honor him. The inclination towards those who belong to God, the holy communion of love in God, that characteristic feature of the N.T., is also foreshadowed in the O.T. by the people of God, who are regarded as one in respect to him, and whose close, absolute communion with God is represented by the image of marriage. This image is still repeated in the N.T., nevertheless in such a manner that the union is represented as not yet accomplished; for, though Christ is designated as the bridegroom and the Church as the bride, the wedding is made to coincide with the establishment of his kingdom. Thus considered, the love of God and the furtherance of the love of God are still a figurative expression. God wants the whole heart of his people: one love, one sacrifice, exclusively directed towards him, so that none other should exist beside it; and that all inclinations of love towards any creature should be comprised in it, derived from it, and return to it. On this account his love is called jealous, and he is said to be a jealous God. This jealousy of God, however, this decided requiring of an exclusive submission on the part of his people, is, on the other hand, the tenderest carefulness for their welfare, their honor, and their restoration. </p> <p> The close connection, indeed the unity of both, is evident. The effect of this jealousy of God is to kindle zeal in those who serve him, and consequently opposition against all that opposes, or even does not conduce to his service. This is a manifestation of love towards God, which love is essentially a return of his own love, and consequently gratitude, accompanied by the highest appreciation, and an earnest desire for communion with him. It includes joy in all that serves God, absolute submission to him, and a desire to do everything for his glory. The love in God, i.e., the love of those who feel themselves bound together by that common bond, is essentially of the same character; but, from the fact of its being directed towards creatures who are afflicted with many failings and infirmities, must also include — as distinguished from the love towards God — a willingness to forgive, which makes away with all hinderances to full communion, a continual friendliness under all circumstances, consequently patience and gentleness, zeal for their improvement, and sympathy for their failings and misfortunes. But as the love of the creative, redemptive, and sanctifying God, extending further than merely those who have attained to that communion with him, embraces all, so should also the love of those who love God. Yet in the divine love itself there is a distinction made, inasmuch as God's love towards those who love him and keep his commandments is a strengthening, sustaining pleasure in them (&nbsp;John 14:21; &nbsp;John 14:23), while his love towards the others is benevolence and pity, which, according to their conduct, the disposition of their hearts. and their receptivity, is either not felt at all by them, or only produces pain, fear o, or, again, hope, desire, etc., but not a feeling of complete, abiding joy. So in the love of the children of God towards the human race we find the distinction between brotherly and universal love (&nbsp;Romans 12:10; &nbsp;Hebrews 13:1; &nbsp;1 Peter 1:22; &nbsp;2 Peter 1:7). In both we find the characteristics of kindness and benevolence, sympathy, willingness to help, gentleness, and patience; but in the universal love there is wanting the feeling of delight, of an equal aim, a complete reciprocity, of conscious unity in the one highest good. </p> <p> Love also derives a special determination from the personality, the spiritual and essential organization of the one who loves, and also his particular position. It manifests itself in friendship as a powerful attraction, a hearty sympathy of feelings, a strong desire for being together and enjoying a communion of thoughts and feelings. In sexual love it is a tender reciprocal attraction, a satisfaction in each other as the mutual complement of life, and a desire for absolute and lasting community of existence. Parental, filial, and brotherly love can be considered as a branch of this affection. Both friendship and love have the full sanction of Christian morals when based on the love of God. As wedded love is an image of the relation between the Lord and his people, or the Church (&nbsp;Ephesians 5:23 sq.), so paternal, filial, and brotherly love are respectively images of the love of God towards his children, of their love towards him, and of their love towards each other. All these relations may want this higher consecration, and yet be well regulated; they have then a moral character. But they may also be disorderly: friendship can be sensual, selfish, and even degenerate into unnatural sexual connection; sexual love may become selfish, having no other object but the gratification of lust; parental love may change to self-love, producing over-indulgence, and fostering the vices of the children; brotherly love can degenerate into flattery and spoiling. Thus this feeling, which in its principle and aim should be the highest and noblest, can become the most common, the worst, and the most unworthy. </p> <p> Both kinds of love are mentioned in Scripture. The highest and purest tendency of the heart is in the Bible designated by the same name as the more natural, immoral, or disorderly tendency. The same was the case among the [[Greeks]] and Romans: ῎Ερως, Amor,, and Ἀφροδίτη, Venus, had both significations, the noble and the common; but Christianity has in Christ and in his Church the perfect illustration and example of true love, whose absolute type is in the triune life of God himself. This divine love, as it exists in God, and through the divine Spirit in the heart of man, together with the connection of both, is represented to us in Scripture as infinitely deep and pure. We find it thus represented in the Old Testament (see &nbsp;Deuteronomy 33:3; &nbsp;Isaiah 49:13 sq.; &nbsp;Isaiah 57:17 sq.; &nbsp;Isaiah 55:7 sq.; &nbsp;Jeremiah 31:20; &nbsp;Jeremiah 32:37 sq.; &nbsp;Ezekiel 34:11 sq.; &nbsp;Hosea 3:2 sq.; &nbsp;Micah 7:18 sq.). Then in the whole mission of Christ, and in what he stated of his own love and of the Father's, see &nbsp;Matthew 11:28; Luke 15; &nbsp;John 4:10; &nbsp;John 4:14; &nbsp;John 6:37 sq.; &nbsp;John 7:37 sq.; &nbsp;John 9:4; &nbsp;John 10:12 sq.; &nbsp;John 12:35; &nbsp;John 13:1; &nbsp;John 15:12-13; John 17; and, for the testimony of the apostles, &nbsp;Romans 5:5 sq.; &nbsp;Romans 8:28 sq.; &nbsp;Romans 11:29 sq.; 1 Corinthians 13; &nbsp;Ephesians 1:3; &nbsp;Ephesians 1:17 sq.; &nbsp;Ephesians 5:1 sq.; &nbsp;1 John 3:4, etc. These statements are corroborated by the testimony of Christians in all ages, who have all been witness to this love, however much their views may have differed on other points. In later times, ethical essays on the subject have thrown great light on the nature and modes of manifestation of this love; see among them, Daub, Syst. d. christl. Moral, 2:1, page 310; Marheineke, Syst. d. theol. Moral, page 470; Rothe, Theol. Elthik, 2:350. — Herzog, Real-Encyklop. 8:388 sq. See Wesleyana, page 54. </p>
       
==References ==
<references>


Love <ref name="term_56425" />
<ref name="term_56426"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/hastings-dictionary-of-the-new-testament/love Love from Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament]</ref>
<p> <b> [[Love.]] </b> —In the word ‘love’ is concentrated, we may say, the essence of the [[Christian]] religion. It is love that is the outstanding feature in the revelation Christ has given us of the nature of God, love that is the controlling power in the life of the Son who claimed that he that had seen Him had seen the Father (&nbsp;John 14:9). On the two commandments to love God and to love our neighbour, Christ declares that all the Law and the [[Prophets]] hang (&nbsp;Matthew 22:40). In the commandment to love one another as He has loved them, He sums up the new law which He lays upon His disciples, declaring that by their fulfilment of it the faithfulness of their discipleship shall be known (&nbsp;John 13:34 f.). We propose to exhibit from different points of view the place which love holds in the doctrine of Christ. </p> <p> <b> 1. The love of God for man. </b> —It is certainly true, as has been pointed out, that Christ does not, in the Synoptic Gospels, speak directly of the love (ἀγάπη) of God. But if He does not thus expressly <i> predicate </i> love of God, it is because He has already endowed Him, as <i> subject </i> , with this love in the highest degree. The doctrine of the Fatherhood of God, which is the foundation of the whole gospel of Christ, contains within it the fullest recognition of the love of God. If the [[Apostolic]] writers of the [[Nt]] expand with greater fulness the doctrine of the [[Divine]] love, they are only making explicit the truth involved in the assurance of the Fatherhood of God set forth on every page of the Synoptic Gospels. The God whose love is the constant theme of St. Paul’s preaching is the Father-God of Jesus Christ (so [[H.]] Holtzmann interprets the [[Pauline]] formula ὁ θεὸς καὶ πατὴρ τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, <i> Neutest. Theol. </i> i. 171). In the one word ‘Abba,’ which Christian lips have learned to repeat after the Master, there lies to St. Paul the assurance of the Divine love which can banish the old feeling of bondage and inspire the spirit of adoption (&nbsp;Romans 8:15). The Johannine doctrine that God is love (&nbsp;1 John 4:8) is but the statement in abstract terms of the truth to which Christ has given concrete expression in the doctrine of the Fatherhood of God. For it is the love of God that Christ will express by this name which is so constantly on His lips. He speaks of God not only as His own Father (‘My Father’), or as the Father of those who are members of the [[Kingdom]] of God (‘your Father’), but as ‘the Father’ absolutely (&nbsp;Matthew 11:27, &nbsp;Mark 13:32, &nbsp;Luke 11:13). The title suggests more than the relation in which God stands to mankind as their Creator. In &nbsp;Matthew 5:44-48 Christ urges His hearers to become God’s sons by showing a love like to that of their Father in heaven, ‘for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.’ Did Fatherhood mean merely Creatorship, there could be no question of <i> becoming </i> the sons of God. All men are God’s creatures. The fact that Christ speaks of our becoming God’s sons, proves that He is using the terms ‘Father’ and ‘sons’ in an ethical sense. By Fatherhood He indicates the love which God cherishes for men, by sonship the love by which they may prove themselves like in character to this Father whose nature is love. This love suggested by the name ‘Father’ is the very essence of the Divine nature. It is not merely one among the various attributes of God. It is the supreme and dominating element in the Divine character. It is in it that the Divine perfection lies; and when Christ urges us to be perfect as our Father in heaven is perfect (&nbsp;Matthew 5:48), it is evident from the context that it is of the love of God that He is thinking, a fact recognized by Lk., who substitutes ‘merciful’ for the ‘perfect’ of Mt.’s version (&nbsp;Luke 6:36). </p> <p> This love of the Father in heaven is the foundation upon which the gospel of Christ rests. It is all-embracing. God is the Father not only of those who are members of the Kingdom of God, <i> i.e. </i> of those who by the love which animates them prove themselves to be His sons (&nbsp;Matthew 5:45), but of all men. The evil as well as the good, the unjust as well as the just, are the objects of His love ( <i> ib. </i> ); and if the facts to which Christ refers, in this connexion, in proof of the universality of the Father’s love, do not go beyond such natural blessings as the sunshine and the rain, that is explained on the ground that these blessings require for their appreciation no special receptivity on the part of those who enjoy them (Beyschlag, <i> Neutest. Theol. </i> i. 81). The Father cares for all. Each individual is precious in His sight. ‘It is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish’ (&nbsp;Matthew 18:14). The very hairs of our head are all numbered (&nbsp;Matthew 10:30). There is joy in heaven over one sinner that repenteth (&nbsp;Luke 15:7; &nbsp;Luke 15:10). In the fact of God’s Fatherhood there lies the assurance that He will certainly give good things to them that ask (&nbsp;Matthew 7:11; &nbsp;Matthew 18:19), and that He will welcome the penitent sinner who turns to Him (&nbsp;Luke 15:11-32). It is the Father’s good pleasure, Christ assures us, to give us the Kingdom (&nbsp;Luke 12:32), that greatest of all blessings, to obtain which a man might well be willing to sacrifice everything else (&nbsp;Matthew 13:44-46); and with it He gives us all such material blessings as He sees to be necessary for us (&nbsp;Luke 12:31, &nbsp;Matthew 6:33). When we thus gather together the various utterances of Christ with regard to the God whom He reveals to us as Father, when we think of the assurance that name breathes of bountiful providence, of watchful care, of forgiving love, when we remember, above all, how Christ points to the Father’s unfailing goodness towards the undeserving as an instance of the Divine perfection, we must confess that though the Synoptic [[Gospels]] contain no direct mention of the love of God, the Being whose character the [[Saviour]] seeks to reveal to us by that name ‘Father’ is one whose very nature is love. </p> <p> In the Fourth [[Gospel]] it is the same representation of the nature of God that meets us. Here, too, ‘Father’ is the favourite designation. It has been questioned, indeed, whether the title ‘Father’ has the same significance in the Fourth Gospel as in the Synoptics. [[H.]] Holtzmann ( <i> Neutest. Theol. </i> ii. 433 f.) maintains that in the constantly recurring designation of God as ‘the Father’ there is always either an express or a tacit reference to the Son. [For a full discussion of the use of the word ‘Father’ in St. John, see Westcott, <i> The [[Epistles]] of St. John </i> , pp. 29–34]. But there are occasions on which we feel that the title is used in a manner which suggests a reflexion on the love of God quite in the manner of the Synoptics, as when Christ says to the disciples that whatever they shall ask the Father in His name He will give (&nbsp;John 15:16; &nbsp;John 16:23), or when He tells them that He does not say that He will pray the Father for them, for the Father Himself loveth them (&nbsp;John 16:26 f.). And in any case the question of the significance attaching to the title ‘Father’ in the Fourth Gospel is of minor interest in our present inquiry, since that Gospel contains many express declarations of the love of God, the absence of which makes the question of the significance of that title in the Synoptics matter of importance. These express references to the love of God in the Fourth Gospel occur specially in connexion with that aspect of the Divine love which we proceed to consider under the following head. </p> <p> <b> 2. The love of God for man as manifested in Christ. </b> —The highest proof of the Father’s love is given in the mission and Person of the Son. This aspect of the Divine love, which is emphasized in the Fourth Gospel, is not unknown in the Synoptics, though it is rather implied than expressed. If the love of the Father is manifested in the bestowal of the Messianic Kingdom (&nbsp;Luke 12:32), that Kingdom which has been prepared for His children from the foundation of the world (&nbsp;Matthew 25:34), and which is now about to come with power (&nbsp;Mark 9:1), then the sending of the Son (&nbsp;Matthew 10:40; &nbsp;Matthew 21:37) to inaugurate the Kingdom must in itself be an evidence of the love of God. All things are delivered unto the Son of the Father, and He alone can reveal the Father to man (&nbsp;Matthew 11:27, &nbsp;Luke 10:22). And this revelation is not confined to His preaching. It embraces the whole of His Messianic work. That work was from beginning to end animated by the spirit of love. He pointed to His works of healing as proof that the Messianic era had arrived (&nbsp;Matthew 11:5; &nbsp;Matthew 12:28). He described His daily work on one occasion as ‘casting out devils and doing cures’ (&nbsp;Luke 13:32). He called to all who laboured and were heavy laden to come to Him and He would give them rest (&nbsp;Matthew 11:28). As He had assured men of the forgiving love of God, so He declared that He came not to call the righteous but sinners (&nbsp;Mark 2:17), and on occasion announced the forgiveness of their sins to those who approached Him (&nbsp;Mark 2:5, &nbsp;Luke 7:47 f.). His whole ministry was one continual mission of love, culminating in the willing sacrifice of His own life as a ransom for many (&nbsp;Mark 10:45). If we look for the revelation which the Son gives of the Father, not only to His preaching but to His Person and work, then we must admit that that revelation is one which confirms at every point the assurance of God’s boundless love for man conveyed by the gracious title by which Christ designates Him. </p> <p> But this aspect of the matter is not emphasized in the Synoptics as it is in the Fourth Gospel. Here the mission of the only-begotten Son for the salvation of man is expressly cited as a proof of the vastness of the love of God (&nbsp;John 3:16 f.); and whatever question there may be as to the metaphysical relation suggested by that word ‘only-begotten,’ there can be none as to the depth of the love involved in the sacrifice of the Son so designated. We may note not only the depth but the wideness of the love here proclaimed. God gives His Son for the salvation of the <i> world </i> . This wider outlook in connexion with the work of Christ is characteristic of the Fourth Gospel [[(O.]] Holtzmann, <i> Johannesevangelium </i> , 49 f., 80 ff.). Christ is the Saviour of the world (&nbsp;John 4:42), the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world (&nbsp;John 1:29). He speaks to the world (&nbsp;John 8:26), gives His flesh for the life of the world (&nbsp;John 6:51), is the light of the world (&nbsp;John 9:5, &nbsp;John 12:46). Into this world burdened with sin (&nbsp;John 1:29) and animated by a spirit of hostility to Himself (&nbsp;John 12:31, &nbsp;John 17:14), God in His infinite love has sent His Son for its deliverance (&nbsp;John 3:17). Throughout the whole Gospel there is far more prominence given than in the Synoptics to the fact that Christ has been sent by the Father (&nbsp;John 5:37, &nbsp;John 7:16, &nbsp;John 8:16; &nbsp;John 8:28 etc.). He repeatedly refers to Himself as Him whom the Father hath sent (&nbsp;John 5:38, &nbsp;John 6:29, &nbsp;John 10:36, &nbsp;John 17:3). He is not come of Himself (&nbsp;John 7:28), but is come in the name of His Father (&nbsp;John 5:43) from whom He has come forth (&nbsp;John 8:42, &nbsp;John 16:27, &nbsp;John 17:8). Not only does the Son, as in the Synoptics, claim to reveal the Father as none other, He asserts that He is in the Father and the Father in Him (&nbsp;John 10:38, &nbsp;John 14:10; &nbsp;John 14:20, &nbsp;John 17:21; &nbsp;John 17:23). He and the Father are one (&nbsp;John 10:30, &nbsp;John 17:22). The words that He speaks have been given Him by His Father (&nbsp;John 7:16 f., &nbsp;John 12:49 f., &nbsp;John 14:10; &nbsp;John 14:24, &nbsp;John 17:8). The works that He does are the works of His Father who dwelleth in Him (&nbsp;John 14:10). He that hath seen Him hath seen the Father (&nbsp;John 14:9). As it is love that has inspired the Father in the mission of His Son, so it is love that is the animating principle in the life of the Son who is one with the Father—love to the Father on the one hand (&nbsp;John 14:31), and love to His own in the world on the other (&nbsp;John 13:1, &nbsp;John 15:13). As the Father has loved Him, so He has loved His disciples (&nbsp;John 15:9). He sets His love before them as an example, and bids them love one another as He has loved them (&nbsp;John 13:34, &nbsp;John 15:12). The highest proof of His love is given in His death (&nbsp;John 10:15, &nbsp;John 15:13). The Son lays down His life willingly in obedience to the commandment of the Father (&nbsp;John 10:17 f.). For this the Father has given the Son (&nbsp;John 3:16 ἔδωκε, if not to be restricted to the giving to the death, may be taken, in view of &nbsp;John 3:14, cf. &nbsp;John 12:32, to include this reference); and the result will be the consummation of the gracious purpose which animated the Father in the giving of the Son. The cross will become the centre of attraction. Through it Christ will draw all men unto Him (&nbsp;John 12:32, &nbsp;John 8:28, &nbsp;John 11:52, cf. &nbsp;John 10:15 f.), and gain the victory over the prince of this world (&nbsp;John 12:31). Thus will the love which impelled the Father to the sacrifice of the Son gain the end it seeks to attain, man’s deliverance from the destruction which threatens him, and participation in the blessing of everlasting life (&nbsp;John 3:15 f., &nbsp;John 6:40). </p> <p> Such is the aspect under which the love of God is presented in the Fourth Gospel. It is in the Person of Christ that we have the full and complete revelation of that love. He is God’s love incarnate. The [[Prologue]] gives the keynote to the whole Gospel. Christ is the Word become flesh, the perfect revelation in human personality of the Divine nature. He is the only-begotten Son (or only-begotten God, if we adopt the reading θεός instead of υἱός), who has declared the Father to us (&nbsp;John 1:18). With God in the beginning (&nbsp;John 1:2), He was made flesh, and dwelt among us (v. 14). The glory that we behold in Him is a full revelation of the Divine glory, for His relation to the Father is that of an only son who receives the whole of his father’s inheritance ( <i> ib. </i> ). And that glory is the glory of one who reflected in His own person the Divine love, who was full of <i> grace </i> and truth ( <i> ib. </i> ), and of whose fulness we have received, in ever increasing measure, participating in the grace which flowed from Him. </p> <p> <b> 3. The mutual love of God and Christ. </b> —The words ‘Father’ and ‘Son’ as applied by Christ to God and man in their relations to one another have, as we have seen, an ethical significance. It is by His love that God proves Himself the Father. It is by exhibiting a love like to that which God displays that man becomes the son of God (&nbsp;Matthew 5:45). The terms do not lose their ethical content when used to describe the relation in which God and Christ stand to one another. The God whom Christ revealed to men as ‘the Father’ He had known first of all as His own Father. Such He had felt Him to be from His childhood (&nbsp;Luke 2:49). So He addressed Him in prayer (&nbsp;Matthew 11:25 f., &nbsp;Mark 14:36, &nbsp;Luke 23:46); so He spoke of Him to others (&nbsp;Matthew 10:32 f., &nbsp;Matthew 11:27; &nbsp;Matthew 18:19; &nbsp;Matthew 18:35, &nbsp;Luke 22:29). He knew Himself to be in a special sense the object of the Divine love. He had been anointed of the Spirit for the performance of the work for which He was sent (&nbsp;Mark 1:10, &nbsp;Luke 4:18-21), and endowed with a power whereby He might triumph over every hostile influence (&nbsp;Luke 10:19; &nbsp;Luke 11:20). In a remarkable utterance (&nbsp;Luke 10:22, &nbsp;Matthew 11:27) Christ describes the intimate relationship in which the Father and He stand to one another, ‘All things are delivered to me of my Father; and no man knoweth who the Son is but the Father; and who the Father is but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him.’ The mutual knowledge which Father and Son have of one another is based upon that mutual love indicated by the terms Father and Son. Christ claims to be able to reveal God in His character of Father (τίς ἑστιν ὁ πατήρ) as no one else, for none can have such knowledge of the Father’s love as the Son, who knows Himself to be in the supreme degree the object of that love (&nbsp;Mark 1:10), and can say of Himself that all things are delivered unto Him of His Father, <i> i.e. </i> all things necessary for the fulfilment of the Father’s gracious purpose. And the Father can reveal Himself thus to the Son because of the love with which that Son responds to His love, and the meekness and submission with which He surrenders Himself to the Father’s will (&nbsp;Matthew 11:29, &nbsp;Mark 14:36). It is evident that in this striking word of Christ’s regarding the mutual knowledge of the Father and the Son, the words ‘Father’ and ‘Son’ are not mere names to denote the persons concerned, but are used to suggest that mutual love upon which the knowledge is based. And indeed all through the Synoptic Gospels there is always a suggestion of this relationship of mutual love in the manner in which God and Christ are spoken of as Father and Son. Whether, when Christ is spoken of in the Synoptics as the Son of God, there is more than this ethical relationship implied, is a question upon which there is difference of opinion. But it is admitted, even by those who attach a deeper significance to the designation, that, in the first instance at any rate, it has an ethical content, and that, when Christ is called the Son of God, whatever more may be implied, so much in any case is suggested, that on the one nand He is the supreme object of the Father’s love, and that on the other He exhibits in His Person in its perfection that loving obedience whereby man may become the son of God. </p> <p> In the Fourth Gospel the references to the love of the Father and the Son to one another are more frequent and more express. Christ is the only begotten Son (&nbsp;John 3:16), loved by the Father before the foundation of the world (&nbsp;John 17:24), and now returned to the bosom of the Father (&nbsp;John 1:18). He and the Father know one another intimately (&nbsp;John 10:15). The Father loves Him, and has given all things into His hand (&nbsp;John 3:35). As in the Synoptic account of the announcement at the Baptism, Christ is called the beloved Son in whom God is well pleased (&nbsp;Mark 1:11), so in Jn. the love of the Father is occasionally represented as being based upon the Son’s obedience to the Father’s commandment (&nbsp;John 15:10) and willing sacrifice of Himself (&nbsp;John 10:17). The Father never leaves Him alone (&nbsp;John 16:32), for He does always those things that please Him (&nbsp;John 8:29). Because He keeps His Father’s commandments He abides in His love (&nbsp;John 15:10). No higher estimate can be given of the Saviour’s love for His disciples than to say that He has loved them as His Father has loved Him (&nbsp;John 15:9), nor of the love of God for believers than to compare it to that of the Father for the Son (&nbsp;John 17:23). Sometimes the love of God for believers is represented as based upon that of the Father for the Son (&nbsp;John 14:21; &nbsp;John 14:23, &nbsp;John 16:27). </p> <p> And as the Father loves the Son, so the Son loves the Father. He alone has seen and known the Father (&nbsp;John 3:11; &nbsp;John 3:32, &nbsp;John 6:46, &nbsp;John 7:29, &nbsp;John 8:55, &nbsp;John 10:15). He does nothing of Himself, but only what He seeth the Father do (&nbsp;John 5:19). He speaks only as His Father hath taught Him (&nbsp;John 8:28, &nbsp;John 12:50). His meat is to do the will of Him that sent Him (&nbsp;John 4:34). It is love to the Father (&nbsp;John 14:31) no less than love to His brethren (&nbsp;John 13:1, &nbsp;John 15:13) that is the motive that animates Him in the fulfilment of His vocation. In virtue of the love which unites them one to the other, each may be said to be in the other, the Son in the Father and the Father in the Son (&nbsp;John 10:38, &nbsp;John 14:10; &nbsp;John 14:20, &nbsp;John 17:21; &nbsp;John 17:23). They have no separate interests. Whatever belongs to the one belongs to the other (&nbsp;John 17:10). The Father and the Son are one (&nbsp;John 10:30, &nbsp;John 17:22). </p> <p> <b> 4. The love of man for God. </b> —There is comparatively little under this heading to be found in the Gospels. It is true that Christ has Himself given as the first commandment of all, that which enjoins the love of God with the whole heart and soul and mind and strength (&nbsp;Mark 12:28 ff.), and in the same spirit in the Fourth Gospel He finds the final explanation of the unbelief of the [[Jews]] in their lack of this love of God (&nbsp;John 5:42). But so far as the former of these passages is concerned, it is evident that Christ’s answer to the scribe is purposely couched in language borrowed from the Old Testament; and it is a noteworthy fact that at other times, when He has no occasion to conform to [[Ot]] modes of expression, Christ does not give prominence to the duty of love towards God. </p> <p> Ritschl has drawn attention to the fact of how small a part the love of man towards God plays throughout the [[Nt]] as a whole. ‘Love is reserved as the characteristic of God and God’s Son in the foundation and guidance of the congregation, while of its members faith or trust in God and His Son is demanded’ ( <i> Rechtf. u. Vers. </i> ii. 100 f.). [[B.]] Weiss thinks that Christ keeps the commandment of love to God in the background, because where the love of God does not awaken such love in return it would be of no avail to demand it ( <i> Bib. Theol. of [[Nt]] </i> , § 25 <i> b </i> ). Wendt, while recognizing that the idea of love corresponds well, on the whole, to the filial relationship, believes that it is too general, and does not give sufficient prominence to the relation of subordination and complete dependence in which man stands to God. To express the feeling of whole-hearted devotion to God suggested by the idea of love, while at the same time giving full recognition to His infinite love and power, Christ selected the term ‘trust’ (τιστις) as the one most suitable to describe the disposition man should display ( <i> Lehre [[Jesu]] </i> , ii. 227). </p> <p> Whatever the reason, we must recognize the fact that neither in the Synoptics nor in the Fourth Gospel, with the exception of the passages referred to, do we find Christ dwelling on the love which man should cherish towards God. But though He speaks of man’s trust in God rather than of his love towards Him, we must not overlook the fact that this trust which Christ seeks to inspire is but love under a slightly different form. It is the response of the human heart to the infinite love of God,—love on the part of man awakened by the love of God, yet humbling itself in the presence of One who, though the Father, is yet Lord of heaven and earth. Without love there can be no such trust as Christ seeks to inspire. The prayer in which this trust finds expression must be the outpouring of a heart full of love to God and of zeal for the establishment of His Kingdom. The righteousness which becomes the members of the Kingdom must be righteousness not of outward conduct alone, but of a heart which takes delight in the performance of the Divine will. The believer is to seek first the Kingdom and the righteousness of God (&nbsp;Matthew 6:33), to have his heart fixed on the heavenly treasure (&nbsp;Matthew 6:21), to be filled with whole-hearted devotion to the service of God (&nbsp;Matthew 6:24), and to renounce, no matter at what cost, whatever may hinder him in the attainment of the great end set before him (&nbsp;Mark 9:43-48, cf. &nbsp;Matthew 13:44 ff.). Though there may be little explicit reference in the teaching of Christ to the love for God which man is required to cherish, we feel that in the case of the believer no less than in that of Christ Himself, it is the source from which springs all the strength for the performance of duty and the endurance of suffering, and that, just as Christ accounted for the unbelief of the Jews by the utter lack in them of this love of God (&nbsp;John 5:42), so, if we trace back to its beginnings the faith which the gospel inspires, it will be found to issue from the love to the Father who has revealed Himself in Christ. </p> <p> <b> 5. The love of man for Christ. </b> —Of love for Christ there is almost no mention in the Synoptics. In one utterance, indeed, Christ requires His followers to love Him more than their closest earthly relatives (&nbsp;Matthew 10:37). But the purpose of that saying, as is proved by the parallel passage, &nbsp;Luke 14:26, is not so much to insist on a personal affection for Himself as the condition of discipleship, as to emphasize the supreme worth of the good represented by His own Person, compared with which the joys of family life are to be esteemed as nothing. The nearest approach to any reference to love of Himself as a motive for conduct is to be found in those passages in which He puts His own Person in the foreground, requiring of His disciples a readiness to sacrifice themselves for His sake (&nbsp;Mark 8:35; &nbsp;Mark 10:29), and attaching high importance to the most trivial acts done in His name (&nbsp;Mark 9:37; &nbsp;Mark 9:41). On these occasions He identifies Himself with His cause. When He requires devotion to Himself, it is only another way of requiring devotion to the truth revealed in His Person. Thus He speaks of sufferings borne for His sake and the gospel’s (&nbsp;Mark 8:35; &nbsp;Mark 10:29, cf. &nbsp;Luke 18:29), and of being ashamed of Him and of His words (&nbsp;Mark 8:38, &nbsp;Luke 9:26). In this spirit He welcomed the love displayed by the woman who anointed His feet in the Pharisee’s house, as a proof of the sincerity of the repentance which filled her heart, and of the vastness of the blessings she was conscious of having received (&nbsp;Luke 7:47). </p> <p> In the Fourth Gospel, where the personal relation to Christ is so strongly emphasized, there is more direct reference to love as the disposition the believer may be expected to display towards Christ. Jesus tells the Jews that if God were their Father they would love Him, for He proceeded forth and is come from God (&nbsp;John 8:42). Of the disciples He says, on the other hand, that the Father loveth them because they have loved Him, and have believed that He came from God (&nbsp;John 16:27). Something is, indeed, still lacking in their love. He tells them in His farewell address that if they loved Him they would rejoice because He said that He went unto the Father (&nbsp;John 14:28). But though their love be not perfect, He can confidently reckon upon it. He would only remind them, as He does more than once in the course of that address, that a true love for Him will manifest itself in the keeping of His commandments (&nbsp;John 14:21; &nbsp;John 14:23 f.). So it had been with His own love for the Father (&nbsp;John 14:31). So let it be with the disciples. Let them prove the sincerity of their love to Him by the loyalty of their obedience. Such a relationship to Himself, love manifesting itself in faithful fulfilment of His commandments, is the condition upon which the giving of the [[Paraclete]] is promised (&nbsp;John 14:15 ff.). Where it exists, Christ promises the enjoyment of the closest communion with the Father and Himself (&nbsp;John 14:21; &nbsp;John 14:23). It is quite in keeping with the emphasis that has been laid upon love throughout the Gospel as the relation which must exist between the disciple and Christ, that in the final scene with Peter in the Epilogue He should thrice address to him the question, ‘Lovest thou me?’ (&nbsp;John 21:15-17), as if to suggest that such love is the indispensable qualification on the part of one who would be a true shepherd of Christ’s flock. </p> <p> In view of these quotations, it is difficult to understand Ritschl’s statement ( <i> Rechtf. u. Vers. </i> iii. 560), that, apart from &nbsp;John 21:15-16, there is no reference in the [[Nt]] to love towards Christ. [[Certainly]] it is the case that, for the most part, faith is the usual formula to indicate the relation of the believer to Him. But it is quite in accordance with the general character of this Gospel, with its conception of a mystical union between the believer and Christ (&nbsp;John 15:1 ff.), to use warmer colours to paint the devotion of the believer, and to describe that complete self-surrender to Christ, which is the true relation to Him, as the work of love. </p> <p> <b> 6. The love of man to man. </b> —Alongside of the first great commandment to love the Lord our God, Christ places a second, ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself’ (&nbsp;Mark 12:31). The high importance He assigned to this duty is evident from the place He gives it alongside of the commandment to love God. ‘There is none other commandment greater than these’ ( <i> ib. </i> ). Both are ethical in their nature. The ceremonial observances in which Christ’s contemporaries thought to find the fulfilment of this first commandment are never to be allowed to stand in the way of the performance of the offices of love towards our fellow-men. These latter, because they are ethical, are the weightier matters of the Law which are on no account to be omitted (&nbsp;Matthew 23:23). To refuse to support one’s parents, on the plea that one desires to make an offering of the money that might be used for this purpose, is to make a travesty of religion (&nbsp;Mark 7:9-13). The ethical stands above the ceremonial. God desires mercy, not sacrifice (&nbsp;Matthew 12:7). The first commandment may be to love the Lord our God, but when it is a question of showing love towards our brother man or performing some act of worship towards God, there can be no doubt which is to come first, ‘Leave there thy gift before the altar, and first go thy way; be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift’ (&nbsp;Matthew 5:23 f.). </p> <p> In the enunciation of this second great commandment, Christ specifies the love which men are required to show for one another as the love of one’s <i> neighbour </i> . [[Doubtless]] the word was suggested by the precept from Leviticus which He quoted, just as the form of the first commandment is based, as we have seen, upon the language of Deuteronomy. When we inquire as to the wideness of the circle denoted by the term ‘neighbour,’ we seem to find an answer in the parable of the Good Samaritan, which was told, according to Lk., in response to the question that had been put, ‘Who is my neighbour?’ (&nbsp;Luke 10:29-37). But in its present form that parable gives no satisfactory answer to the question. After telling the story of what befell the traveller, how he was maltreated by the thieves and passed by in his miserable plight by the priest and the Levite, and how at last the [[Samaritan]] took compassion on him, Christ asks, ‘Which now of those three, thinkest thou, was neighbour unto him that fell among the thieves?’ The answer is, the Samaritan; and the conclusion of the parable seems to be that it was the traveller’s duty to love the Samaritan, <i> i.e. </i> that the term ‘neighbour’ is wider than the lawyer who had put the question seemed to imagine, and must be held to embrace any who by their conduct prove themselves worthy of the name, whether they be Jews or not (so Wendt, <i> Lehre Jesu </i> , ii. 268). This is certainly the logical conclusion from the parable as it at present stands, but it is questionable whether this can have been the lesson Christ desired to enforce by it. It starts with the object of proving who is one’s neighbour in the sense of <i> diligendus </i> (&nbsp;Luke 10:29), and ends by proving who is the traveller’s neighbour in the sense of <i> diligens </i> , &nbsp;Luke 10:36 (Jülicher, <i> Die Gleichnisreden Jesu </i> , ii. 596). The nearest approach that it reaches to a definition of the term ‘neighbour’ in the sense required is contained in the ‘Go and do thou likewise’ with which it concludes. The usual method of interpreting the parable is to find the answer to the question in the practical lesson enforced by that exhortation, and to conclude that our neighbour is anyone who requires our help. But in view of the immediately preceding statement that the neighbour of the traveller was the Samaritan who had compassion on him, it seems utterly incongruous to conclude that the design of the parable is to teach that one’s neighbour is not one’s benefactor, but anyone that one can benefit, <i> i.e. </i> in this case that the traveller was the neighbour of the Samaritan. So we can only conclude that Lk. is responsible for the introduction of the parable in connexion with this question of the lawyer’s, and that whatever the original purpose for which it was related, it was certainly not designed to give an answer to the question, ‘Who is my neighbour?’ in the sense of ‘Who is the person [[I]] am required to love?’ </p> <p> But the precise scope of the term ‘neighbour’ in the mouth of Christ is of the less importance, as it is only on the occasion of His interview with the scribe (&nbsp;Mark 12:28-34, &nbsp;Matthew 22:35-40) that He thus defines the limits within which one is to show love towards one’s fellow-men, and there, as we have seen, He is evidently formulating His answer in the language of the [[Ot]] commandment. In opposition to the narrow sense in which the term ‘neighbour’ was interpreted by His contemporaries, who could add to the injunction to love their neighbour a corollary to the effect that they were to hate their enemy (&nbsp;Matthew 5:43), Christ enjoined a love which was to embrace both friend and enemy (&nbsp;Matthew 5:44 f.). The [[Golden]] Rule which Christ has given men to guide them in their offices of love takes us far beyond the circle of neighbours in the narrow [[Jewish]] sense. The command runs, ‘All things whatsoever ye would that men (not your neighbours) should do unto you, do ye even so to them’ (&nbsp;Matthew 7:12). We are to show love to all. ‘Whosoever shall smite thee,’ ‘if any man will sue thee,’ ‘whosoever shall compel thee,’ ‘he that asketh thee,’ ‘he that would borrow of thee,’—these are the phrases with which Christ introduces those to whom He commands His disciples to show love (&nbsp;Matthew 5:39-42). Sometimes He describes them as ‘brothers’ (&nbsp;Matthew 5:22; &nbsp;Matthew 5:24, &nbsp;Matthew 7:3-5, &nbsp;Matthew 18:15; &nbsp;Matthew 18:21 f., &nbsp;Matthew 18:35), not in the sense of those who are bound to us by natural ties, in which sense brotherly love is practised by the [[Gentiles]] as well (&nbsp;Matthew 5:47), nor in the sense of fellow-citizens of the Kingdom of God (so [[B.]] Weiss; Westcott, <i> The Epistles of St. John </i> , note on &nbsp;1 John 2:9), in which sense the word would reproduce in a new form the limitation that attached to the Jewish interpretation of the term ‘neighbour,’ but in the same wide sense as He applies the term ‘Father’ to God. He is the Father not only of the members of the Kingdom, but of all mankind (&nbsp;Matthew 5:45), and by using the term ‘brother’ to denote the objects of our love, Christ will suggest that it is to be a love as wide and all-embracing as that of the Father in heaven, who bestows His bounties on good and evil,—a love not only of those who are members of the Kingdom of God, but of all who have the right to look up and claim God as their Father in heaven (Wendt, <i> Lehre Jesu </i> , ii. 270 f.). The command to forgive our brother his trespasses (&nbsp;Matthew 18:35) is interpreted in the widest sense in &nbsp;Matthew 6:14 f., when, in place of forgiving our <i> brother </i> , Christ speaks of forgiving <i> men </i> their trespasses. </p> <p> From various occasional utterances of Christ we can form a general idea of the nature of the love which He expects men to display in their relations to one another. Its unselfishness on the one side, and its interest in the welfare of others on the other, are features which continually appear in the exhortations in which He seeks to inculcate it. In illustration of the unselfish spirit which He commends, He urges His hearers to invite to their banquets not their friends and kinsmen who may invite them in return, but the poor, the maimed, the lame and the blind, who cannot recompense them (&nbsp;Luke 14:12 ff.). In the same spirit He bids men lend, hoping for nothing (&nbsp;Luke 6:35, according to the translation of μηδὲν ἀπελπίζοντες best suited to the context). Another aspect of the unselfishness which is characteristic of the spirit of love Christ would instil, is the suppression of those vindictive feelings which are prone to rise when we experience ill-treatment from others. We are required to forgive those who have wronged us, not seven times, but seventy times seven (&nbsp;Matthew 18:21 f.): to be so far from resenting injury we receive from another that we turn the other cheek to the smiter, allow him who would take away our coat to have our cloak also, and go two miles with him who would compel us to go one (&nbsp;Matthew 5:38-42); to love our enemies, and to pray for them that persecute us (&nbsp;Matthew 5:44). Again, this unselfishness will exhibit itself in the absence of all self-assertion or desire to attain pre-eminence among our fellows. Such self-exaltation is characteristic of the scribes and [[Pharisees]] (&nbsp;Mark 12:38 f., &nbsp;Matthew 23:5 ff.), and of the Gentiles (&nbsp;Mark 10:42, &nbsp;Luke 22:25). But the follower of Christ, who came not to be ministered unto but to minister, and who was among His disciples as he that serveth, will be ready to stoop to the lowliest service (&nbsp;Mark 10:43-45, &nbsp;Luke 22:26 f.), and will seek for self-exaltation only through self-abasement (&nbsp;Luke 14:11). </p> <p> But while love is thus regardless of self, it will ever seek to advance the good of others. It will give readily to supply their demands (&nbsp;Matthew 5:42, &nbsp;Luke 6:30). Nay, it will be quick to anticipate them. It will teach us to put ourselves in their place and realize what they stand in need of. ‘All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them’ (&nbsp;Matthew 7:12, &nbsp;Luke 6:31). We shall not hesitate to share with them our earthly goods. ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive’ is a saying of Christ’s preserved by St. Paul (&nbsp;Acts 20:35) which is not recorded in the Gospels. In the picture which Christ has painted of the Judgment, He claims as offices of love performed towards Himself acts of kindness done to our unfortunate fellow-creatures (&nbsp;Matthew 25:34-40). That is the wise use of our riches whereby we make to ourselves friends of those whom we benefit (&nbsp;Luke 16:9). But we shall care not only for our brother’s worldly interests, but also for his spiritual welfare. We are solemnly warned to give heed lest we cause him to stumble (&nbsp;Mark 9:42, &nbsp;Luke 17:1 f.). It is not the will of our Father which is in heaven that one of these little ones, <i> i.e. </i> the humblest member of the Kingdom of God, should perish (&nbsp;Matthew 18:14). And while we are careful to avoid the censorious spirit which takes delight in uncharitable judgment of the faults of others (&nbsp;Matthew 7:1 f.), we shall still feel it our duty to rebuke our brother when he trespasses, and to endeavour to reclaim him from his sin (&nbsp;Matthew 18:15 f.). </p> <p> One other point worthy of notice in connexion with the duty of brotherly love which Christ inculcates, is the light in which this duty is presented in view of the love which we experience at the hands of God. At the root of all that Christ says regarding the love which we should display to one another lies the great truth of the Fatherhood of God. That word of St. John’s, ‘We love because he first loved us’ (&nbsp;1 John 4:19), expresses the position which Christ takes up. To forgive another his trespasses and to recompense an injury with kindness, to love one’s enemies and to pray for them that persecute one, appears the height of magnanimity from the standpoint of the natural man. But Christ puts the matter in a new light. He reminds us of the love with which God treats man, undeserving as he is, and of the readiness with which He forgives us our offences. In the parable of the Unforgiving [[Servant]] (&nbsp;Matthew 18:23-35) He exhibits in its true light the conduct of the man who, freely forgiven at the hands of God, yet refuses to forgive his brother who has offended him. And as our indignation burns at the behaviour of the unforgiving servant in the parable, we realize that so far from the forgiveness of those who have offended us being the magnanimous conduct we had imagined, it is a simple duty, the non-fulfilment of which calls for severest condemnation. </p> <p> In the Fourth Gospel the duty of love to our brother is laid down with the utmost distinctness, though the references are comparatively few. As in the Synoptics Christ had summed up the Law and the Prophets in the Golden Rule to do unto others whatsoever we would that they should do to us, so here He concentrates His ethical teaching to His disciples in the new commandment to love one another as He has loved them (&nbsp;John 13:34; &nbsp;John 15:12). It was a new commandment in the new emphasis with which it was enjoined, in the new place assigned to it as the one principle in which the Law and the Prophets find fulfilment (&nbsp;Matthew 7:12; &nbsp;Matthew 5:17 ff., cf. &nbsp;Romans 13:9, &nbsp;Galatians 5:14), in the new sanction it received through the appeal to Christ’s own example. He declares that the keeping of this commandment is the sure test whereby His disciples may be recognized by others (&nbsp;John 13:35). It is by their fulfilment of it alone that they may enjoy such close communion with Him as He enjoys with His Father (&nbsp;John 15:10; &nbsp;John 15:12). He has given them an example in His own Person of the love they are to practise. At the last meal with His disciples, at which this new commandment was given, He had Himself washed their feet, to enforce the injunction to lowly service which He laid upon them (&nbsp;John 13:14 ff.). But this act of condescension on the part of the [[Master]] was typical of the self-denying love which He had displayed throughout His whole intercourse with them, that love which reached its culminating point in the willing sacrifice of His life. It is to this that He points when He urges them to love one another as He has loved them. ‘Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends’ (&nbsp;John 15:13). </p> <p> It has been urged that the brotherly love which is thus commended in the Fourth Gospel falls short of that enjoined in the Synoptics, in respect that it is limited to the circle of the Christian brotherhood. While Christ in the Synoptics commands us to love our neighbour, and insists that the love which He enjoins must embrace not only our friends but our enemies, we read in the Fourth Gospel of a love <i> for one another </i> (&nbsp;John 13:34-35; &nbsp;John 15:12; &nbsp;John 15:17). The reciprocal pronoun points to a limitation of the love to the Christian brotherhood. The [[Christians]] are known not by their love for others, but by their mutual love amongst themselves [[(H.]] Holtzmann, <i> Handcom </i> . on &nbsp;John 13:13, <i> Neutest. Theol. </i> ii. 388 f.; [[O.]] Holtzmann, <i> Johannesevang </i> . 76, 266). And as the love which the believer is exhorted to practise is limited to the Christian brotherhood, so also, it is maintained, is that of Christ Himself, which is held up as an example. The Fourth Gospel and St. Paul both cite the death of Christ as the highest proof that can be given of His love; but St. Paul finds in it a proof of His love for His enemies (&nbsp;Romans 5:6 ff.), whereas the [[Evangelist]] adduces it as a proof of His love for His friends (&nbsp;John 15:13). Such love of friends, it is maintained, is the highest love the Gospel recognizes. Of love for one’s enemies it knows nothing [[(O.]] Holtzmann, <i> ib. </i> 87, 276; [[H.]] Holtzmann, <i> Handcom. </i> on &nbsp;John 15:13, <i> Neutest. Theol. </i> ii. 477). </p> <p> We must admit that there is so much truth in the contention that, as a matter of fact, the love referred to in &nbsp;John 13:34 f., &nbsp;John 15:12; &nbsp;John 15:17 is a love of Christian brethren for one another. It would be quite unwarrantable to find the novelty of the commandment &nbsp;John 13:34 in the wideness of its scope, to which there is no reference at all in the context. But it is equally unwarrantable to explain that novelty as consisting in the narrowness of the circle within which Christ, in the context, insisted on its fulfilment, as if this commandment to practise brotherly love were an advance upon the old injunction to love one’s neighbour. (So Grotius: ‘Novum autem dicit, quia non agit de dilectione communi omnium, sed de speciali Christianorum inter se, qua tales sunt’; cf. Kölbing, <i> [[Sk]] </i> [Note: [[K]] Studien und Kritiken.] , 1845, pp. 685–694). It is a mistake to take the commandment in any exclusive sense, as if there were any contrast implied to the wider commandment of the Synoptics. Christ speaks of the love of Christian brethren for one another, either because He had had occasion immediately before to give His disciples a lesson on the manner in which they should be ready to render loving service to one another (&nbsp;John 13:4-17), or because it was natural to look for the display of this spirit of love He would inculcate first of all within the smaller circle of those who stood in close relation to Him and to one another. It is not a question of confining their love to their Christian brethren, but of displaying it towards those with whom they come into closest contact. </p> <p> In the same way as Christ urges them to show their love to those who stand nearest to them, He represents His own love as issuing in the sacrifice He made for them, His friends. He does not mean that it was because of the love they had shown Him as friends that He responded with this culminating proof of love in return. On the contrary, He calls them friends because they are the objects of His love (&nbsp;John 15:15 f.). His sacrifice has not been evoked by the friendship they have displayed. It is rather their friendship that is the response to the love He has cherished for them, of which that sacrifice was the culminating proof. </p> <p> While we recognize, then, that in this farewell conversation with His disciples, the love which Christ urges them to display is in the first instance a love of one toward another, we cannot admit that there is any intention on the part either of the Evangelist or of Christ Himself to limit the practice of it to the Christian brotherhood. The circumstances in which the address was spoken sufficiently explain the form in which the commandment is given, and the manner in which Christ’s example is appealed to. The Teacher who had inculcated a love which was to embrace friend and enemy alike might well feel constrained to give His own disciples the commandment to love one another. And He who had given His life as a ransom for many might well remind those who stood nearest to Him that they were among the many for whom the sacrifice was made, and appeal to them to love one another as He had loved them. </p> <p> Literature.—Sartorius, <i> The [[Doctrine]] of Divine Love </i> ; Wendt, <i> Die Lehre Jesu </i> , ii.; <i> [[Nt]] Theol. </i> of [[B.]] Weiss, Beyschlag, [[H.]] Holtzmann, Stevens; Ritschl, <i> Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung </i> ; Rothe, <i> Theol. Ethik </i> ; Seeley, <i> Ecce Homo </i> , chs. xiii. xiv.; [[F.]] [[W.]] Robertson, <i> Serm. </i> iv. 222; Law, <i> Serious Call </i> , ch. xx.; Butler, <i> Serm. </i> xi.–xiv.; [[C.]] [[A.]] Briggs, <i> Ethical Teaching of Jesus </i> , 97, 114. </p> <p> [[G.]] Wauchope Stewart. </p>
       
 
<ref name="term_18819"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/bridgeway-bible-dictionary/love Love from Bridgeway Bible Dictionary]</ref>
== References ==
       
<references>
<ref name="term_42030"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/holman-bible-dictionary/love Love from Holman Bible Dictionary]</ref>
<ref name="term_56425"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/hastings-dictionary-of-the-new-testament/love+(2) Love from Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_18034"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/baker-s-evangelical-dictionary-of-biblical-theology/love Love from Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_78291"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/vine-s-expository-dictionary-of-nt-words/love Love from Vine's Expository Dictionary of NT Words]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_76401"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/vine-s-expository-dictionary-of-ot-words/love Love from Vine's Expository Dictionary of OT Words]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_61319"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/king-james-dictionary/love Love from King James Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_36368"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/fausset-s-bible-dictionary/love Love from Fausset's Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_16583"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/american-tract-society-bible-dictionary/love Love from American Tract Society Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_70430"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/people-s-dictionary-of-the-bible/love Love from People's Dictionary of the Bible]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_20079"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/charles-buck-theological-dictionary/love Love from Charles Buck Theological Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_140374"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/webster-s-dictionary/love Love from Webster's Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_32431"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/easton-s-bible-dictionary/love Love from Easton's Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_5903"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/international-standard-bible-encyclopedia/love Love from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_48794"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/love Love from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref>
       
</references>
</references>

Revision as of 09:52, 13 October 2021

Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament [1]

1. Linguistic usage. -Two verbs are used by the NT to designate religious love-ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν. In the Septuaginta third term, ἐρᾶν, occurs, but only once sensu bono , viz.  Proverbs 4:6 (love of wisdom), once in a neutral sense, viz.  Esther 2:17 (the king loved Esther), everywhere else as a figure of idolatry or political theocratic unfaithfulness ( Jeremiah 22:20;  Jeremiah 22:22,  Lamentations 1:19,  Ezekiel 16:33;  Ezekiel 16:36-37;  Ezekiel 23:5;  Ezekiel 23:9;  Ezekiel 23:22,  Hosea 2:7;  Hosea 2:10;  Hosea 2:12-13). That the NT does not employ ἐρᾶν at all is probably due to the sensual associations of the word. In regard to the difference between ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν the following should be noticed. The etymology of ἀγαπᾶν is uncertain, but it seems to be allied to roots expressing ‘admiration,’ ‘taking pride in,’ ‘taking pleasure in.’ This points to the conclusion that ἀγαπᾶν is the love of selection and complacency based on the perception of something in the object loved that attracts and pleases. This element of selective attachment shows itself in the fact that ἀγαπᾶν can mean ‘to be contented with,’ ‘to acquiesce in,’ ‘to put up with,’ and also in this, that ἀγαπᾶν is not used of the love of mere compassion. On the other hand, φιλεῖν seems to have as its fundamental root-meaning the intimacy of bodily touch, ‘fondling,’ ‘caressing,’ whence it can signify ‘to kiss’; it therefore denotes the love of close association in the habitual relations of life-love, between kindred, between husband and wife, between friends ( Matthew 6:5;  Matthew 10:37;  Matthew 23:6,  Luke 20:46,  John 11:3;  John 11:36;  John 12:25;  John 15:19,  1 Timothy 6:10 [φιλαργυρία],  2 Timothy 3:4 [φιληδόνος],  Titus 2:4 [φίλανδρος],  James 4:4 [φιλία τοῦ κόσμοὑ]). In Latin diligere corresponds to ἀγαπᾶν, amare to φιλεῖν, except that amare covers a wider range, corresponding also to the Greek ἐρᾶν. From this distinctive and fundamental meaning the fact may be explained that in biblical Greek ἀγαπᾶν is used exclusively where man’s love for God comes under consideration: it here implies the recognition of the adorable and lovable character of the Deity. φιλεῖν is never used of man’s love for God as such, because the mental attitude of intimacy which the word implies would be out of place in the creature with reference to the Deity (it is different where the love of the disciples for Jesus is spoken of [ John 16:27;  John 21:15-17,  1 Corinthians 16:22]), Scripture prefers the word which unambiguously puts human love in the religious sphere on a moral and spiritual basis, even if, in order to do so, it has to leave somewhat of the intensity of the religious affection unexpressed. As designations of the love extending from God to man both ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν may be used, the former in so far as God’s love is not blind impulse or irrational sentiment, but a love of free self-determination, the latter because it is proper to God by a gracious condescension to enter into that close habitual friendship with man which the word connotes. As a matter of fact, however, φιλεῖν is but rarely used to describe the love of God towards man.

In extra-biblical Greek love as extending from the gods to man seems to be an unknown conception, for according to Aristotle and Dio Chrysostom both ἀγαπᾶν and φιλεῖν have place not in those who rule with reference to those they rule over, but only in the opposite direction: ἄτοπον φιλεῖν τὸν Δία (where Δία is the subject).

It is in keeping with the distinction above drawn that the specific term for brotherly love (see articleBrotherly Love) is φιλαδελφία, for the idea is derived from the family-relation, although, of course, ἀγαπᾶν here occurs with equal frequency. On the other hand, of the love for enemies enjoined in the NT φιλεῖν never occurs, being excluded by the nature of the case, whereas ἀγαπᾶν, involving a deliberate movement of the will, may apply to such a relation.

While it appears from what has been said that ἀγαπᾶν had by reason of its inherent signification and classical use an antecedent fitness to express the biblical idea of religious love, this should not be construed to mean that the word carried already in extra-biblical Greek all the content of the Scriptural conception. In the profane usage the moral, spiritual element was yet lacking, although the elements of choice and rational attachment were given. Like so many other words which possessed an antecedent affinity for the biblical world of thought from a formal point of view, it needed the baptism of regeneration in order to become fit for incorporation into the vocabulary of Scripture.

The noun ἀγάπη seems to have been coined by the Septuagintto translate the OT conception of religious love. It is not found in classical Greek, nor even with Philo and Josephus. Perhaps the fact that the profane literature does not have the noun is significant. It can be explained on the principle that only through transference into the moral, spiritual sphere could the habitual character of the act of loving, which is inherent in the noun, originate. The noun in the Vulgate is caritas , from carum habere , which admirably expresses the specific character of the biblical conception. Caritas in turn gave rise to the ‘charity’ of the English Bible (Authorized Version), in most passages used of love towards fellow-Christians (cf., however,  1 Corinthians 8:3,  1 Thessalonians 3:6,  2 Timothy 2:22;  2 Timothy 3:10, where there is no reason so to restrict it). The Revised Versionsubstitutes ‘love,’ in all passages where the Authorized Versionhas ‘charity’ (26 times in all), for the reason that ‘charity’ has in modern usage become restricted to the love of beneficence or forbearance.

The following discussion confines itself to the love existing between God and man. For love as between man and man see articleBrotherly Love.

2. Love in the apostolic teaching .-Love is in the apostolic teaching a central and outstanding trait in the disposition of God towards man. In this respect the view taken by Jesus is fully adhered to. If in the witness of the early Church, as recorded in Acts, no direct affirmation of this principle is made, that can easily be explained from the apologetic purpose of this witness. In the fellowship of the first Christians among themselves the indirect operation of the new force introduced by Jesus into the hearts of His followers manifests itself clearly enough ( Acts 2:41-47;  Acts 4:32 ff.)

i. St. Paul.-With St. Paul love is explicitly placed in the foreground as the fundamental disposition in God from which salvation springs and as that which in the possession of God constitutes for the believer the supreme treasure of religion. God is the God of love ( 2 Corinthians 13:11). In  Galatians 5:22 love is named first among the fruits of the Spirit. It is associated with the Fatherhood of God ( Ephesians 6:23). In the apostolic salutations it stands co-ordinated with the grace of Christ ( 2 Corinthians 13:14,  Ephesians 6:23,  2 Thessalonians 3:5). It is the greatest of the three fundamental graces of the Christian life, and the sole abiding one of those three ( 1 Corinthians 13:8-13). This primacy love can claim even in comparison with faith. For, on the one hand, faith as well as hope is a grace made necessary by the provisional conditions of the present sinful world, and in both its aspects-that of mediate spiritual perception and that of trust-will be superseded by sight in the world to come ( 2 Corinthians 5:7); on the other hand, faith as compared with love is instrumental, not an end in itself; it brings the Christian into that fundamental relation to God, wherein his religions faculties, foremost among which is love, can function normally ( Galatians 5:6). The prominence of faith in the Pauline teaching is not therefore indicative of its absolute and final preponderance in the Christian consciousness. It would, however, scarcely be in accordance with St. Paul’s view to press the primacy of love to the extent of denying all independent significance to other religious states. There is an aspect in which faith in itself, and apart from its working through love, glorifies God ( Romans 4:20), and whatever thus directly contributes to the Divine glory has inherent religious value. The same must be affirmed of the knowledge of God. The emphasis thrown throughout the NT on the value of truth cannot be wholly explained from its soteriological utility. It expresses the conviction that knowing and adoring God are in themselves a religious act, apart from all fructifying influence on the believer’s life. When St. Paul includes ‘knowledge’ ( 1 Corinthians 13:8) in the things that shall be done away, this applies only to the specific mode of knowledge in this life, the ‘seeing in a mirror darkly,’ the knowledge of a child, which will make place in the world to come for a full knowledge ‘face to face,’ analogous to the Divine knowledge of the believer ( 1 Corinthians 13:12). ‘Knowledge,’ while of value, is not equal in value to love ( 1 Corinthians 8:3).

( a ) The love of God .-It has been alleged that in two respects the Apostle’s teaching on the love of God marks a retrogression as compared with the gospel of Jesus: on the one hand, St. Paul restricts the love of God to the circle of believers, thus making sonship co-extensive with adoption=justifications; on the other hand, he emphasizes, side by side with love, the working of sovereignty and justice as equally influential attributes in God, whence also the effectual communication of the Divine love to the sinner cannot, according to the Apostle, take place except as a result of the sovereign choice of God and after satisfaction to His justice. This charge, however, rests on a misunderstanding of the teaching of Jesus. Jesus, by way of correction to the prevailing commercial conception of God’s attitude towards man in Judaism, brings forward the love of God. Nevertheless the specific Fatherly love and the corresponding state of sonship are in His gospel, no less than with St. Paul, redemptive conceptions, pertaining not to man as such, but to the disciples, the heirs of the kingdom. This may be seen most clearly from the fact that in its highest aspect sonship is an eschatological attainment ( Matthew 5:9,  Luke 20:36; cf.  Romans 8:23). It is true that a developed soteriology like St. Paul’s, delimiting the mutual claims or the love and justice of God, is not found in our Lord’s teaching. But this could not be expected before the supreme saving transaction-the Death of Christ-had actually taken place. The great principles on which the Atonement rests are enunciated with sufficient clearness ( Mark 10:45). In comparisons between Jesus and St. Paul it is frequently overlooked that what corresponds to the Apostle’s soteriology is the eschatological element in Jesus’ teaching. As a matter of fact, St. Paul’s doctrine of salvation was developed in the closest dependence on his eschatology. If the comparison be instituted with this in mind, it will be seen that in our Lord’s eschatological utterances the sovereignty and justice of God occupy no less central a place than in the Pauline doctrine of salvation, and that the love of God in its eschatological setting is to Jesus as much a redemptive factor as it is in the Pauline gospel.

The phrase ‘the love of God’ occurs in the Pauline Epistles in  Romans 5:5;  Romans 8:39,  2 Corinthians 13:14,  2 Thessalonians 3:5,  Titus 3:4 (φιλανθρωπία); ‘the love of Christ’ occurs in  Romans 8:35 (variant reading ‘love of God’),  2 Corinthians 5:14,  Ephesians 3:19; ‘the love of God in Christ’ in  Romans 8:39. In all these cases the genitive is a subjective genitive. In ‘the love of the Spirit’ ( Romans 15:30) the genitive seems to be that of origin (cf.  Colossians 1:8). Some exegetes propose for  Romans 5:5 and  2 Thessalonians 3:5 ‘love towards God.’ In the former passage the context is decisive against this (cf.  2 Thessalonians 3:8, and the fact that the consciousness of ‘the love of God’ furnishes the basis for the certainty of the Christian hope). In  2 Thessalonians 3:5 the sense is determined by the parallel phrase, ὑπομονὴ τοῦ Χριστοῦ; if this could mean the ‘patient waiting for Christ’ (Authorized Version), then ἀγαπὴ τοῦ θεοῦ would be love for God.’ Such a rendering, however, seems to be linguistically improbable, and the ordinary interpretation of ὑπομονή as ‘patience,’ ‘steadfastness,’ requires Χριστοῦ as a subjective genitive. The meaning is not that the love of God and the patience of Christ are held up as models to the readers, but the Apostle prays that their hearts may be directed to a full reliance on the love of God and the steadfastness of Christ as the two mainsprings of their salvation. In  2 Corinthians 5:14 ἡ γὰρ ἀγαπὴ τοῦ Χριστοῦ συνέχει ἡμᾶς is not to be explained on analogy with the preceding ‘fear of the Lord’ ( 2 Corinthians 5:11), nor in contrast to the knowledge of ‘Christ after the flesh’ ( 2 Corinthians 5:18), in the sense of St. Paul’s love for Christ; but, in close agreement with the following ‘One died for all,’ it is meant of the love Christ showed by His Death.

To St. Paul the love of God is throughout a specifically redemptive love. Its manifestation is seldom sought in Nature and providence ( Romans 8:28, ‘all things’), but regularly in the work of salvation. Since this work culminates in the Death of Christ, the Cross is the crowning manifestation of the Divine love ( Romans 5:8). What thus finds supreme expression at its height underlies the entire process as its primordial source. The love of God is to St. Paul the fountain of redemption. It lies behind its objective part, what is theologically called ‘the Atonement,’ for St. Paul traces this in both its aspects of reconciliation and redemption to the one source. As regards reconciliation, the initiative of love is inherent in the conception itself, since God makes those who were objectively His enemies His friends, creating by the Death of Christ the possibility for His love to manifest itself ( Romans 5:8;  Romans 5:10-11,  2 Corinthians 5:14;  2 Corinthians 5:18-21). The idea of redemption has the same implications, for it emphasizes the self-sacrifice of love to which God was put in saving man ( Acts 20:28,  1 Corinthians 6:20;  1 Corinthians 7:23). This love is unmerited love, hence its more specific name of χάρις; ‘grace.’ It is love,’ not mere ‘mercy’ or ‘pity,’ which determines God’s attitude towards the sinner. The mercy is enriched by the love ( Ephesians 2:4). The usual associations of ἀγαπᾶν apply to the love of God for sinners only in so far as it is a deliberate movement of the Divine will and purpose, not because there is something admirable or attractive in the spiritual and ethical condition of man which would explain its origin. For the very reason that it springs spontaneously from God without objective motivation, this Divine love is a mystery ‘passing knowledge’ ( Ephesians 3:19). Salvation on its subjective side is derived by St. Paul even more clearly from the love of God. The gift of the Spirit is a pledge of it to the believer; hence with the pouring forth of the Spirit into the heart, the love of God is poured out therein ( Romans 5:5). On the consciousness of this love rests the certainty of hope in the completion of salvation ( Romans 5:4-5). St. Paul calls the love underlying the application of redemption πρόγυωσις, ‘foreknowledge’ ( Romans 8:29); the simple γιγνώσκειν in this specific sense occurs in  1 Corinthians 8:3,  Galatians 4:9,  2 Timothy 2:19. This term denotes not an intellectual prescience; but, in dependence on the pregnant sense of the Hebrew ידע ( Exodus 2:25,  Hosea 13:5,  Amos 3:2), it means that God sovereignly sets His affection upon a person. The absoluteness and unconditioned character of this prognosis are such that it can furnish proof for the proposition that all things work together for the good of believers. Hence it fixes as the destiny of believers (‘predestination’) eschatological likeness unto the image of the glorified Christ, and with infallible certainty moves forward through the two intermediate stages of vocation and justification to the goal of this glory ( Romans 8:28-30). The conception of ἐκλογή, ἐκλέγεσθαι (middle voice, ‘to choose for one’s self’) has likewise for its correlate the sovereign love of God ( Ephesians 1:4). The association of the redemptive love of God with His prerogative of sovereign choice renders the word ἀγαπᾶν especially suitable for describing the relation involved. It is in the interest of emphasizing both the sovereign Divine initiative and the energy and richness of effectuation of redemptive love that St. Paul affirms its eternity (connoted also by the προ in προγιγώσκειν [ Ephesians 1:4]).

The love of God does not exclude for St. Paul the co-ordination of other attributes in God as jointly determinative of the Divine redemptive procedure. In the Cross of Christ is the great manifestation of love, but it is not the love of God alone that the Cross proclaim. It also demonstrates the δικαιοσύνη = the justice of God ( Romans 3:25 ff.). The attempt of Ritschl ( Rechtfertigung und Versöhnung 2, ii. [1882-83], pp. 118, 218ff.) and others to give to δικαιοσύνη in this context the sense of gracious righteousness, making it synonymous with the love of God, breaks down in view of the ‘forbearance’ of  Romans 3:25. If it was ‘forbearance’ which postponed under the Old Covenant the demonstration of God’s righteousness, then this righteousness is conceived as retributive.

( b ) The love of Christ .-The love of Christ St. Paul views chiefly as manifested in His Death ( 2 Corinthians 5:14 f.), or in His life as entered upon and lived with a view to and culminating in His Death ( Philippians 2:5 ff). The Incarnation is an act of self-kenosis, not in the metaphysical, but in the metaphorical sense (Authorized Version‘made himself of no reputation’); hence is described in  2 Corinthians 8:9 as a ‘becoming poor.’ It ought to be noticed that the love of Christ, as well as that of the believer, is in the first place a love for God, and after that a love for man. Christ lives unto God, even in the state of glory ( Romans 6:10), and gave Himself in the Atonement: a sacrifice unto God ( Ephesians 5:2).

( c ) Love towards God .-The references to the believer’s love for God are not numerous in the Pauline Epistles. Explicit mention of it is mode in  Romans 8:28,  1 Corinthians 2:9;  1 Corinthians 8:3. From his anti-pietistic standpoint Ritschl would interpret this scarcity of reference in St. Paul and the NT generally (outside of St. Paul only  James 1:12;  James 2:5) as due to the feeling that love to God is something hardly within the religious reach of man. He observes that in  1 Corinthians 2:9 the phrase ‘them that love God’ is a quotation, and surmises that the same quotation underlies all the other passages except  1 Corinthians 8:3 ( op. cit. ii 100). But this is a mere surmise, and St. Paul has at least in one passage appropriated the thought for himself. Besides this the analogy of the love of Christ for God favours the ascription of love for God to the believer. The same ‘living for God’ which is predicated of Christ ( Romans 6:10) is elsewhere attributed to the Christian ( Galatians 2:19). As Christ sacrificed Himself to God ( Ephesians 5:2), so the believer’s life is a spiritual sacrifice ( Romans 1:9;  Romans 12:1). The Fatherhood of God and the sonship of the believer postulate the idea of a mutual love ( Romans 8:15). The idea is also implied in the fact that St. Paul places at the beginning of the Christian life a crucifixion and destruction of the love for self and the world ( Romans 6:6,  Galatians 2:19;  Galatians 6:14), since under the Apostle’s positive conception of the Christian life something else must take the place of the previous goals. The glorifying of God in all things has for its underlying motive the love of God ( Romans 14:8,  1 Corinthians 10:31,  Ephesians 1:12).

ii. Pastoral Epistles.-In the Pastoral Epistles the universality of the love of God is emphasized. In the earlier Epistles the Apostle’s universalism is not deduced from the love of God but from other principles, and is distinctly of an international type. The Pastoral Epistles make of the love of God a universalizing principle and extend it to all men, not merely to men of every nation ( 1 Timothy 2:4;  1 Timothy 2:8;  1 Timothy 4:10;  1 Timothy 6:13,  Titus 2:11;  Titus 3:4). In some of these passages the context clearly indicates that a reference of God’s love to all classes of men is intended (cf.  1 Timothy 2:4 with  1 Timothy 2:1-2;  Titus 2:11, with  Titus 2:2-10). But the emphasis and frequency with which the principle is brought forward render it probable that some specific motive underlies its assertion. So far as the inclusion of magistrates is concerned, there may be a protest against a form of Jewish particularism which deemed it unlawful to pray for pagan magistrates. In the main the passages cited will have to be interpreted as a warning against the dualistic trend of Gnosticism. Gnosticism distinguished between two classes of men, the πνευματικοἱ and the ὑλικοί, the latter by their very nature being unsusceptible to, and excluded from, salvation, the former carrying the potency of salvation by nature in themselves. Over against this the Pastorals emphasize that the love of God saves all men, that no man is by his subjective condition either sunk beneath the possibility or raised above the necessity of salvation. Hence the φιλανθρωπία of God in  Titus 3:4 is love for man as man, not for any aristocracy of the πνεῦμα. This philanthropy is not to be confounded with the classical conception of the same (cf.  Acts 27:3;  Acts 28:2), for the latter is not love towards man as such, but simply justice towards one’s fellow-man in the several relations of life, and is conceived without regard to the internal disposition. Probably the choice of the word is in  Titus 3:4 determined by the preceding description of the conduct required of believers for which the Divine ‘philanthropy’ furnishes the model. But that its content goes far beyond general benevolence may be seen from this, that it communicates itself through the Christian redemption in the widest sense ( Titus 3:5-7). In all this there is nothing either calculated or intended to weaken the Pauline doctrine of the specific elective love of God embracing believers. The Pastorals affirm this no less than the earlier Epistles.

iii. Epistle of James.-The Epistle of James by calling the commandment of love ‘the royal law’ ( James 2:8) places love in the centre of religion. This love is not merely love for men but love to God ( James 2:5). It chooses God and rejects the world, the love for God and the friendship of the world being mutually exclusive ( James 4:4). It manifests itself in blessing God ( James 3:9). Behind this love for God, however, St. James, no less than St. Paul and St. John, posits the love of God for the sinner. God is Father of believers ( James 3:9). They that love God are chosen of God ( James 2:5). The Divine love is a love of mercy; even in the Day of Judgment it retains the form of mercy ( James 2:13,  James 5:20). It is a jealous love, which requires the undivided affection of its object ( James 4:3). An echo of the Synoptical preaching of Jesus may be found in this that St. James sees the love of God demonstrated in the gifts not merely of redemption, but likewise of providence ( James 1:17).

iv. Epistles of Peter.-The Epistles of Peter dwell on the love of Christ rather than on that of God. Christ’s love is a love of self-denial ( 1 Peter 2:21) and of benevolence for evil-doers ( 1 Peter 3:18). To it corresponds love for Christ in the heart of believers. St. Peter shows that this love is strong enough to assert and maintain itself in the face of the invisibleness of Christ ( 1 Peter 1:8; cf.  1 John 4:20 f.). The love for God and Christ is consistent with and accompanied by fear ( 1 Peter 1:17-18). God’s love is implied in the mercy which lies behind regeneration ( 1 Peter 1:3). God is the Father of believers ( 1 Peter 1:17); they are the flock of God ( 1 Peter 5:2); He (or Christ) is the Shepherd of their souls ( 1 Peter 2:25). The longsuffering of God, as a fruit of the Divine love, is mentioned in  2 Peter 3:9.

v. Hebrews.-The theme of the Epistle to the Hebrews-the perfect mediation of priestly approach unto God-coupled with the writer’s vivid perception of the majesty of God brings it about that the love of God remains in the background. The Epistle emphasizes the fear of God even for believers ( Hebrews 4:1;  Hebrews 4:11-13;  Hebrews 12:29). Still believers are sons of God ( Hebrews 2:10,  Hebrews 12:7), brethren of Christ ( Hebrews 2:11,  Hebrews 12:17). God loves His children as the Father of Spirits ( Hebrews 12:6-10). He is the God of His people in the pregnant sense ( Hebrews 11:16). The subsumption of the greater part of the religious consciousness under faith brings it about that the love of Christians is less spoken of here than elsewhere in the NT. It is mentioned in  Hebrews 6:10 as a love shown towards God’s name, i.e. towards God, in the service of the brethren. The Epistle, on the other hand, makes much of the love of Christ for believers as it assumes the form of mercy. This mercy is, however, not motived by the mere suffering as such, but specifically by the moral aspect of the suffering. It is compassion with the moral weakness and danger arising from suffering, because suffering becomes a source of temptation. Christ can exercise this mercy because He Himself has experienced the tempting power of suffering ( Hebrews 2:18,  Hebrews 4:15).

vi. Johannine Literature.-There still remains to be considered the Johannine literature including the Gospel, so far as the statements of the Evangelist himself are concerned. Both the Gospel and the First Epistle represent love as the ultimate source and the ultimate goal of Christianity. There is this difference, that what is in the Gospel related to Christ as love of Christ and love for Christ, is in the Epistle related to God in both directions. In the Apocalypse love to Jesus appears in  Revelation 2:4, love of Jesus in  Revelation 1:5,  Revelation 3:9. ‘The love of God’ is not uniformly, as in St. Paul, the love which God shows, but partly this ( 1 John 2:5;  1 John 4:9;  1 John 4:12) and partly also the love cherished towards God ( John 5:42,  1 John 2:15;  1 John 3:17;  1 John 5:3). Possibly the construction is meant as an inclusive one: ‘the love which God has made known and which answers to His nature’ (so B. F. Westcott, The Epistles of St. John , 1883, p. 49). Love is to St. John as to St. Paul a specifically Divine thing. Wherever it appears in man, it must be traced back to God, and particularly to God’s love ( 1 John 4:10;  1 John 4:19). Its source lies in regeneration ( 1 John 4:7). The Divine primordial love is grace, not motived by the excellence of human qualities, for it expressed itself in giving Christ as a propitiation for sin ( 1 John 4:9-10). The supreme manifestation of God’s love is the gift of Christ, and Christ’s giving of His own life for man ( 1 John 3:16,  1 John 4:8,  Revelation 3:9). Hence the Gospel characterizes the love which Jesus showed in His Death as an ἀγαπᾶν εἰς τέλος (‘to the uttermost’). The giving of the Spirit of God is an act of love not merely because the Spirit is an inestimable gift, but because in the Spirit God communicates Himself; herein lies the essence of love ( 1 John 3:23;  1 John 4:13). The highest embodiment of this redemptive love is the state of sonship ( 1 John 3:1). The Apocalypse uses for this, as extending to the Church collectively, the OT figure of the bride of God ( Revelation 19:7;  Revelation 21:1;  Revelation 21:9). Sonship is not represented, as in St. Paul, as awaiting its eschatological consummation, but rather as issuing into a higher, yet unknown, state ( 1 John 3:2). The summing up of the Christian life in love is represented as ‘a new commandment,’ which is at the same time old ( 1 John 2:7-8,  1 John 3:11;  1 John 3:23). It is old in so far as it goes back to the creation (‘from the beginning’ [ 1 John 2:7,  1 John 3:11,  2 John 1:5-6); it is new in so far as through Jesus and His work it has now become an actuality in the life and experience of Christians; hence ‘it is true in him and in you’ ( 1 John 2:8). In both the Gospel and the First Epistle ‘to know God’ is used as synonymous with ‘loving God.’ ‘To know’ is taken in such connexions in the pregnant sense which implies intimacy of acquaintance and the fellowship of affection. At the same time there is in this an indirect protest against the unethical intellectualism of the false Gnosis ( 1 John 2:3;  1 John 4:13-14;  1 John 3:1;  1 John 3:6;  1 John 4:6-8;  1 John 4:16;  1 John 5:20).

Both the Gospel and the First Epistle emphasize the universalism of the love of God as demonstrated in the gift of Christ for the sin of ‘the world.’ In  John 3:16 ‘the world’ (ὁ κόσμος) seems to be rather qualitatively than quantitatively conceived; the greatness of God’s love is seen in this, that He loves that which is sinful (cf.  1 John 2:2). Both the Gospel and the Epistle also lay stress on the primacy of love in the character of God ( 1 John 4:8;  1 John 4:16). That the universalism must not be understood as appropriating the love of God in its most pregnant sense to every man indiscriminately appears from such statements as  John 6:37;  John 6:39;  John 6:44;  John 13:1;  John 15:19;  John 17:6;  John 17:9;  John 17:12. A predestinarian strand is traceable in St. John as well as in St. Paul. And that the clear statement about the primacy of love in God should not be construed to the exclusion of every other attribute or disposition in God appears plainly from the difference which both the Gospel and the Epistle make between God’s and Christ’s attitude towards the world and towards believers-a difference inconceivable were there in God no place for aught but love. The statement ‘God is love’ means to affirm that into His love God puts His entire being, all the strength of His character. In the Apocalypse it is most vividly brought out that in God, besides love for His own, there is wrath for His enemies (cf. even ‘the wrath of the Lamb’ [6:16]), although it is to be noticed that the Apocalypse speaks as little as the Gospel and the Epistle of God’s hatred towards His enemies. The latter term is reserved for the description of the attitude of the world towards God and Christ and believers. The hatred of the world explains the righteous wrath of God and believers against the world ( John 3:20;  John 7:7;  John 15:18;  John 15:23-25;  John 17:14,  Revelation 2:6).

Literature.-Schmidt, Handbuch der latein. und griech. Synonymik , 1886, pp. 756-768; R. C. Trench, NT Synonyms 9, 1901, pp. 41-44; J. A. H. Tittmann, de Synonymis in NT , 1829-32, pp. 50-55; H. Cremer, Bibt.-Theol. Wörterbuch der neutest. Gräcität 5, 1911, s.v. ἀγαπάω; Deissmann in ThLZ [Note: hLZ Theologische Litteraturzeitung.], 1912, cols. 522-523; E. Sartorius, The Doctrine of the Divine Love , Eng. translation, 1884; G. Vos, ‘The Scriptural Doctrine of the Love of God,’ in Presb. and Ref. Review , xiii. [1902] 1-37; W. Lütgert, Die Liebe im NT , 1905.

Geerhardus Vos.

Bridgeway Bible Dictionary [2]

In the language of the Bible, as in most other languages, the word ‘love’ has a very broad meaning. It may apply to God’s love for people ( Deuteronomy 7:12-13;  John 3:16), people’s devotion to God ( Psalms 91:14;  1 Corinthians 8:3), pure sexual love between a man and a woman ( Proverbs 5:18-19; Song of  Song of Solomon 2:4-5), impure sexual activity such as in prostitution ( Jeremiah 4:30;  Hosea 2:12-13), love between members of a family where sexual feelings are not involved ( Genesis 22:2;  Ruth 4:15), an attitude of kindness towards others, whether friends or enemies ( Leviticus 19:17-18;  1 Samuel 18:1;  1 Samuel 18:16;  Matthew 5:43-46;  John 11:3), or the desire for things that brings pleasure or satisfaction ( Proverbs 20:13;  1 Timothy 6:10).

Where the Bible gives teaching about love, the centre of love is usually the will, not the emotions. Such love is a deliberate attitude, not an uncontrollable feeling ( Matthew 5:44-46Joh_13:34;  John 15:17;  Ephesians 5:25;  Titus 2:4;  1 John 4:20-21).

Christian love does not mean that Christians try to create certain feelings towards others, but that they act towards others the way they know they should ( Luke 10:27;  Luke 10:29;  Luke 10:37). The reason why they so act is that God’s love rules their lives, making them want to do God’s will ( Romans 5:5;  2 Corinthians 5:14;  1 John 4:19). The more they act towards others in love, the more favourable their feelings will become towards those people.

Divine love

The love that God has for the sinful human race originates solely in his sovereign will. He loves people because he chooses to love them, not because they in any way deserve his love ( Deuteronomy 7:7-8;  Jeremiah 31:3;  Romans 5:8;  Ephesians 1:4;  Ephesians 2:4-5;  1 John 3:1;  1 John 4:10).

This was seen clearly in Jesus Christ, who throughout his life helped those in need and by his death saved helpless sinners. Salvation originates in the love of God, and that love found its fullest expression in the cross of Jesus Christ ( Matthew 14:14;  Mark 10:21;  Luke 7:13;  John 3:16;  John 15:13;  Galatians 2:20;  Ephesians 2:4-7;  Ephesians 5:25;  1 John 4:9; see also Mercy ). Jesus Christ could perfectly express God’s love, because he and the Father are bound together in a perfect unity in which each loves the other ( John 3:35;  John 10:30;  John 14:31;  John 15:9;  John 17:24).

So much is love the dominating characteristic of the divine nature that the Bible declares that God is love. Everything that God says or does is in some way an expression of his love ( 1 John 4:8;  1 John 4:16).

If we find this statement hard to understand when we think of God’s wrath and judgment, the reason is probably that we misunderstand the nature of love. God’s love is not an irrational emotion divorced from justice and righteousness, but a firm and steadfast attitude that earnestly desires the well-being of his creatures. God has such a love for what is right that he reacts in righteous anger against all that is wrong. God’s wrath is the outcome of his love ( Habakkuk 1:13;  1 John 1:5; see Wrath ).

God wants to forgive sinners, but because he is a God of love he cannot treat sin as if it does not matter. He cannot ignore it. His act of forgiveness, being based on love, involves dealing with sin. At the same time, because he is a God of love, he provides a way of salvation so that sinners need not suffer the punishment themselves. He has done this by becoming a human being in the person of Jesus Christ and taking the punishment himself on the cross ( John 1:14-18;  John 3:16;  Romans 5:8;  Galatians 2:20;  1 John 4:10; see Atonement ).

This same love causes God to discipline, correct and train his children, so that they might grow into the sorts of people that he, in his superior wisdom, wants them to be. God’s love towards his children is an authoritative love; their love in response is an obedient love ( John 14:15;  John 14:21;  John 16:27;  1 John 2:4-5;  1 John 4:19;  1 John 5:2-3). God’s chastisement may seem painful rather than pleasant, but to ask God to cease his chastisement is to ask him to love us less, not more ( Hebrews 12:5-11; see Chastisement ). Love desires perfection in the one who is loved, and will not be satisfied with anything less ( Ephesians 5:25-27;  James 4:5).

Christians should accept whatever happens to them as being in some way an expression of God’s love and as being in accordance with God’s purposes for them ( Romans 8:28; see Providence ). God’s gift of his Son is the guarantee that all his other gifts will also be an expression of his love ( Romans 8:32). His love is everlasting and measureless. Nothing in life or death can separate believers from it ( Jeremiah 31:3;  Romans 8:35-39;  Ephesians 3:18-19).

Human love

Those whom God created have a duty to love him with their whole being. They are to be devoted to him and obedient to him ( Deuteronomy 6:5;  Deuteronomy 10:12;  Psalms 18:1-3;  Matthew 22:37). As a result of such devoted obedience they will learn more of the meaning of God’s love and so will increasingly experience joyful fellowship with him ( Psalms 116:1-4;  John 14:21-23;  1 Corinthians 2:9;  1 Corinthians 8:3;  1 Peter 1:8;  1 John 4:7;  1 John 4:12;  1 John 4:19).

Love for God will at times create difficulties. Conflicts will arise as people put loyalty to God before all other loyalties, desires and ambitions ( Matthew 6:24;  Matthew 10:37-39;  John 3:19;  1 John 2:15-17). Genuine love involves self-sacrifice ( Ephesians 5:25; cf.  Romans 14:15;  1 Corinthians 13:4-7).

Faith and obedience are just as basic to a relationship with God as is love. If people claim to love God but do not trust in him or obey him, they are deceiving themselves ( John 14:15;  John 14:24;  Galatians 5:6;  James 2:5). Likewise they are deceiving themselves if they claim to love God but do not love their fellow human beings ( Romans 13:10;  1 John 3:10;  1 John 3:17;  1 John 4:8;  1 John 4:20). Christians must have the same loving concern for others as they have for themselves ( Matthew 22:39;  Philippians 2:4). Love is a characteristic of those in whom the Spirit of Christ dwells; for when they receive God’s salvation in Christ, the Holy Spirit fills them with God’s love ( John 15:9-10;  Romans 5:5;  Galatians 5:22;  Ephesians 3:17-19;  Ephesians 5:1-2).

Christians should exercise this love towards everyone, and in particular towards fellow Christians ( John 13:34;  John 15:12-17;  Galatians 6:10;  1 Peter 3:8;  1 John 3:16-17). Such an exercise of love provides evidence that they really are Christians ( John 13:35;  1 John 3:14) and helps them grow towards spiritual maturity ( 1 John 4:12;  1 John 4:17). The church of God is founded upon love and builds itself up through love ( Ephesians 3:17;  Ephesians 4:16). A unity of love between Christians will be clear evidence to the world that the claims of Christianity are true ( John 17:20-23).

Although love for each other is something God demands, people should not practise that love solely as a legal requirement. They must act sincerely and display right attitudes, even when they feel no natural affection for the person concerned ( Exodus 23:4-5;  Leviticus 19:17-18;  Romans 12:9;  1 Corinthians 13:4-7;  1 Timothy 1:5). Good deeds may be worthless in God’s sight if they do not arise out of sincere love ( 1 Corinthians 13:1-3;  Revelation 2:2-4).

Steadfast love

In the Old Testament the special love that God had for Israel was signified by the Hebrew word chesed. It is difficult to find an exact equivalent of this word in English. The RSV translates it mainly as ‘steadfast love’, the GNB as ‘constant love’, and the older English versions as ‘mercy’, ‘kindness’ and ‘loving kindness’ (cf.  Genesis 32:10;  Genesis 39:21;  Psalms 100:5;  Psalms 118:1-3;  Isaiah 54:10;  Hosea 2:19;  Micah 7:18).

The distinctive feature of chesed is covenant loyalty or faithfulness. A covenant is an agreement between two parties that carries with it obligations and blessings, and in the case of God and Israel this covenant was likened to the marriage bond. The two parties were bound to be loyal to each other ( Deuteronomy 7:9;  Deuteronomy 7:12;  Nehemiah 1:5; see Covenant ). God exercised loyal love and covenant faithfulness to his people, and this was to be the basis of their trust in him ( 1 Kings 8:23;  Psalms 13:5;  Psalms 25:7;  Psalms 103:17;  Psalms 136:25;  Hosea 2:19;  Micah 7:20). Yet so often the people were not faithful to God in return. Their covenant love vanished ( Hosea 6:4;  Hosea 11:1-4).

This chesed – this faithful devotion, this loyal love – is what God most desires from his people ( Hosea 6:6). It also shows the quality of love that God requires his people to exercise towards others ( Proverbs 3:3-4;  Hosea 12:6;  Micah 6:8).

Holman Bible Dictionary [3]

 1 Corinthians 13:1 charity agape charity caritas charity love agape agape

In the Old Testament In the Old Testament, the verb "to love" has a range of meanings as broad as the English verb. It describes physical love between the sexes, even sexual desire ( Judges 16:14;  2 Samuel 13:1-4 ). It describes the love within a family and among friends ( Genesis 22:1-2 ). Love as self-giving appears in the significant commandment that Israelites love the stranger. The basis for such selfless love is God's act of redemption ( Leviticus 19:33-34 ).

Hosea used the image of married love to teach us to understand both the faithlessness of Israel and the faithfulness of God. Israel's love is "like a morning cloud, and as the early dew it goeth away" ( Hosea 6:4 ). God desires steadfast love, but Israel had been unfaithful. His own relationship with an adulterous wife allowed Hosea the insight that God had not given up Israel in spite of her faithlessness. The Shema (Hebrew for "hear") of   Deuteronomy 6:4-6 is echoed in Paul's declaration that love is the fulfillment of the law (  Romans 13:10 ).

In the Teachings of Jesus In Jesus' teachings in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, the Shema of Deuteronomy (the command to love God) is united with   Leviticus 19:8 ("Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself") (  Matthew 22:34-40;  Mark 12:28-34;  Luke 10:25-28 ). Just before the parable of the Good Samaritan, a lawyer quoted the two commands to love and then asked Jesus: "And who is my neighbor?" ( Luke 10:29 ) Jesus gave the story of the Samaritan who took care of the man who fell among robbers to illustrate the selfless love which is to be characteristic of citizens of the Kingdom.

In  Matthew 5:43-48 , Jesus gave the radical command to love one's enemies and to pray for those who persecute. Loving only those who love you is, according to Jesus, no better than those who are not His disciples. The love that Jesus' disciples have for others is to be just as complete as God's love ( Matthew 5:48; compare  Romans 5:8 ).

In these teachings, of course, the selfless love is a response to God's prior activity. It is a way of living expected of those who are citizens of the Kingdom. The teachings of Jesus on love of enemy, it will be noted, are a part of the Sermon on the Mount which is directed to Christian disciples. See Sermon On The Mount .

In the Teachings of Paul In the poem on love in  1 Corinthians 13:1 , Paul associated love with the all-important biblical words of faith and hope (see also  1 Thessalonians 5:8;  Galatians 5:6 ) and declared love the greatest. The context for this poem on love is Paul's discussion of relationships within the church.  1 Corinthians 13:1-3 indicate that the gifts of the Spirit (ecstatic speech, wisdom, faith, and self-sacrifice) are good for nothing without love; only love builds up. The Spirit distributes His gifts for the common good (  1 Corinthians 8:1;  1 Corinthians 12:7 ).  1 Corinthians 13:4-7 characterizes love: Love is patient and kind, not jealous or boastful, not arrogant or rude. Love is not selfish, irritable, or resentful. Love does not rejoice at wrong but in the right. Love bears, believes, hopes, and endures all things.

Finally,  1 Corinthians 13:8-13 contrasts love with preaching and knowledge, on the one hand, and faith and hope, on the other. All of these (with love) are important aspects of our lives here and now. Love in contrast to these, however, is not only for the here and now; it is forever. Love, therefore, is "the greatest" of the most significant realities we experience as Christians.

Paul's understanding and discussion of love make love a central theme, and his use of the noun agape makes that term almost a technical term. Prior to Paul, in fact, the Greek term agape was little used. Instead of using a word for love already filled with meaning, Paul took the seldom-used term and filled it with Christian meaning. This love of which Paul wrote is somewhat different from the love we normally experience and speak about. Christian love is not simply an emotion which arises because of the character of the one loved. It is not due to the loving quality of the lover. It is a relationship of self-giving which results from God's activity in Christ. The source of Christian love is God (  Romans 5:8 ), and the believer's response of faith makes love a human possibility ( Romans 5:5 ).

Even though love does not begin in the human heart, the believer must actualize love. In Paul's admonition to Christians to love, the nature of love as self-giving is manifest ( Galatians 5:13-15 ). The Christian walk is to be characterized by love so that Paul could even speak of "walking in love" ( Romans 14:15 ). The Christian is to increase and abound in love ( 1 Thessalonians 3:12 ).

Love is vitally connected with faith in that the believer's faithful response is one of love. Love is also connected with hope. In his prayer for love to increase and abound, Paul indicated that this increase of love has the end that the hearts of Christians might be established "unblameable in holiness" before God when Jesus returns with all his saints ( 1 Thessalonians 3:13 ). Paul also wrote of the hope we have of sharing the glory of God and declared that this hope does not disappoint us, because our hearts have been filled with God's love through the Holy Spirit ( Romans 5:2 ,Romans 5:2, 5:5 ). Christian love is evidence of and a foretaste of the goal of God's purposes for His children.

In the Writings of John The Johannine writings magnify the significance of love as forcefully and fully as any other writings. John's writings account for only one tenth of the New Testament but provide one third of the references to love.

The key text in the first half of the Gospel of John is  John 3:16 . This passage indicates the relationship of the Father's love to the work of Christ and of both to the life of believers. These themes are repeated throughout the Gospel of John. The second half of the Gospel of John emphasizes the ethical dimension of love among Christians. The key passage is Jesus' new commandment in  John 13:34-35 (sec also   John 14:15 ,John 14:15, 14:21 ,John 14:21, 14:23-24;  John 15:9 ,John 15:9, 15:12 ,John 15:12, 15:17 ).

This command of Jesus to love one another gives us insight into the nature of Jesus Christ for the church and the nature of Christian love. What is commanded is not an emotion; it is the disciplined will to seek the welfare of others. Jesus speaks with the authority of the Father, the only One with authority to make such demands of men and women. Jesus speaks as the incarnate Word ( John 1:1 ,John 1:1, 1:14 ). He has authority to give conditions for discipleship. The relationship of this commandment to  Leviticus 19:18 should be noted. Both command love, but Jesus' commandment includes the clause: "as I have loved you."

When the overall importance of love in the Gospel of John is seen, the dialogue between Jesus and Peter concerning Peter's love for Jesus and Peter's tending the sheep ( Leviticus 21:15-17 ) becomes more significant. Our love for Jesus Christ is closely related to our fulfillment of the pastoral task.

The Letters of John make explicit statements about the ethical implications of love. Our appreciation of these letters and the command to love is increased when we realize that John's opponents claimed that they loved God in spite of their unlovely temper and conduct. They claimed enlightenment and communion with God. (They were Gnostics or "Knowers." See  1 John 3:23 ). This love is be manifested in deeds ( 1 John 3:18 ). John left no doubt about the relationship of love and belief in God. Whoever hates his brother is in the darkness ( 1 John 2:9 ). Whoever does not do right and love his brother is not of God ( 1 John 4:20 ).  1 John 4:8 is the climax: "He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love."

In 2,3John this command to love is repeated in direct and indirect ways.  2 John 1:5-6 is addressed to the church, and they are explicitly reminded of the command from Jesus to love one another.   3 John 1:5-6 speaks of the love of the "Beloved Gaius" in terms of giving service to Christian brothers. Diotrephes, however, will live in infamy, for he put himself first, refused to welcome the brethren, stopped those who wanted to welcome the brethren, and put them out of the church (  3 John 1:9-10 ).

Love and Judgment The judgment account in  Matthew 25:31-46 illuminates and is illuminated by the New Testament teachings on love. The account depicts not only what happens at the end. The narrative makes plain that what happens at the end is what happens here and now. Christians love because they have been loved. In such love, God's eternal purposes are being experienced and carried out by his people (  Matthew 25:34-36 ).

Edgar V. McKnight

Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology [4]

God is love and has demonstrated that love in everything that he does. Paul compares faith, hope, and love, and concludes that "the greatest of these is love" ( 1 Corinthians 13:13 ).

"God Is Love."Agape [   1 John 4:8 ). God does not merely love; he is love. Everything that God does flows from his love.

John emphasizes repeatedly that God the Father loves the Son ( John 5:20;  17:23,26 ) and that the Son loves the Father ( John 14:31 ). Because the Father loves the Son, he made his will known to him. Jesus in turn demonstrated his love to the Father through his submission and obedience.

The theme of the entire Bible is the self-revelation of the God of love. In the garden of Eden, God commanded that "you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die" ( Genesis 2:17 ). We are not prepared, then, when God looks for Adam after his sin, calling out "Where are you?" God seeks Adam, not to put him to death, but to reestablish a relationship with him. God, the Lover, will not allow sin to stand between him and his creature. He personally bridges the gap.

That seeking and bridging reaches its pinnacle when God sends his Son into the world to rescue sinners and to provide them with eternal life ( John 3:16;  Romans 5:7-8;  Ephesians 2:1-5 ). John declares, "This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us" ( 1 John 3:16 ). God's love is not based on the merit of the recipient ( Deuteronomy 7:7-8;  Romans 5:7-8 ). Because he is love, God is not willing that any person should perish, but wills that everyone repent and live ( Ezekiel 18:32;  2 Peter 3:9 ).

"Love the Lord Your God." We are totally incapable of loving either God or others—a condition that must be corrected by God before we can love. The Bible's ways of describing this process of correction are numerous: "circumcision of the heart" ( Deuteronomy 30:6 ); God's "writing his laws" on our hearts ( Jeremiah 31:33 ); God's substituting a "heart of flesh" for a "heart of stone" ( Ezekiel 11:19 ); being "born again" by the Spirit ( John 3:3;  1 John 5:1-2 ); removing old clothing and replacing it with new ( Colossians 3:12-14 ); dying to a sinful life and resurrecting to a new one ( Colossians 3:1-4 ); moving out of darkness into light ( 1 John 2:9 ). Until that happens, we cannot love.

God alone is the source of love ( 1 John 4:7-8 ); he "poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us" ( Romans 5:5 ). God's love then awakens a response in those who accept it. God loves through believers, who act as channels for his love; they are branches who must abide in the vine if they are to have that love ( John 15:1-11 ). We have the assurance that we have passed from death to life because we love others ( 1 John 3:14 ).

Once we have received God's love as his children, he expects us to love. In fact, "Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love" ( 1 John 4:8 ). Jude urges his readers to keep themselves in God's love (v.21).

"Love the Lord Your God with All Your Heart." Love of God is a response of the whole of the believerheart, soul, mind, and strength ( Deuteronomy 6:5;  Matthew 22:34-40;  Mark 12:28-34 )to the whole of God. Jesus serves as the believer's model ( John 14:21;  Philippians 2:5-8 ). Obedience to God ( Deuteronomy 6:7;  7:9 ) and renunciation of the world-system ( 1 John 2:16 ) are critical elements of our love of God.

Our love, however, is easily misdirected. Its object tends to become the creation rather than the Creator; it loses sight of the eternal for the temporal; it focuses on the self, often to the exclusion of God and others. We become idolaters, focusing a part or all of our love elsewhere. We are "love breakers" more than "law breakers."

 Genesis 22 presents a classic struggle: the conflicting pulls of love. Abraham loves Isaac, the son of his old age, the child of God's promise. But God tests his love. For the sake of the love of God, Abraham is willing to sacrifice the son he loves. Hisresponse is to a greater love. Jesus describes this conflict as hating father and mother in order to love and follow God (  Luke 14:26 ).

"Love Your Neighbor as Yourself." Love for neighbor is a decision that we make to treat others with respect and concern, to put the interests and safety of our neighbors on a level with our own. It demands a practical outworking in everyday lifeplacing a retaining wall around the roof to keep people from falling ( Deuteronomy 22:8 ); not taking millstones in pledge, thus denying someone the ability to grind grain into flour ( Deuteronomy 24:6 ); allowing the poor to glean leftovers from the orchards and fields ( Leviticus 19:9-12 ). Our actions illustrate our love. Love for neighbor is "love in action, " doing something specific and tangible for others.

The New Testament concept closely parallels that of the Old Testament. John writes: "Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth." Believers need to share with those in need, whether that need is for food, water, lodging, clothing, healing, or friendship ( Matthew 25:34-40;  Romans 12:13 ). The love demonstrated in the parable of the good Samaritan shows that agape [Ἀγάπη] love is not emotional love, but a response to someone who is in need.

The command to love others is based on how God has loved us. Since believers have been the recipients of love, they must love. Since Christ has laid down his life for us, we must be willing to lay down our lives for our brothers ( 1 John 3:16 ).

Many people in Jesus' day believed that a neighbor was a fellow Israelite. When asked to define "neighbor, " however, Jesus cited the parable of the good Samaritana person who knowingly crossed traditional boundaries to help a wounded Jew ( Luke 10:29-37 ). A neighbor is anyone who is in need. Jesus also told his disciples that a "neighbor" might even be someone who hates them, curses them, or mistreats them. Yet they must love even enemies ( Luke 6:27-36 ) as a witness and a testimony.

The Old Testament charge was to "love your neighbor as yourself" ( Leviticus 19:18 ). But Jesus gave his disciples a new command with a radically different motive: "Love each other as I have loved you" ( John 15:12 ). Paul affirms that "the entire law is summed up in a single command: Love your neighbor as yourself'" ( Galatians 5:14 ). James sees the command to love one another as a "royal law" (2:8).

Love is the motivation for evangelism. Christ's love compels us to become ambassadors for Christ, with a ministry of reconciliation ( 2 Corinthians 5:14 ).

Glenn E. Schaefer

See also Fruit Of The Spirit; New Command

Bibliography . H. Bergman, TDOT, 1:99-118; E. Brunner, Faith, Hope, and Love  ; E. J. Carnell, BDT, pp. 332-33; C. E. B. Cranfield, A Theological Word Book of the Bible, pp. 131-36; V. P. Furnish, The Love Command in the New Testament  ; N. Glueck, Hesed in the Bible  ; W. Gunther et al., NIDNTT, 2:538-51; H. W. Hoehner, EDT, pp. 656-59; C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves  ; J. Moffatt, Love in the New Testament  ; L. Morris, Testaments of Love: A Study of Love in the Bible  ; G. Outka, Agape: An Ethical Analysis  ; P. Perkins, Love Commands in the New Testament  ; G. Quell and E. Stauffer, TDNT, 1:21-55; F. F. Segovia, Love Relationships in the Johannine Tradition  ; G. A. Turner, ISBE, 3:173-76.

Vine's Expository Dictionary of NT Words [5]

A — 1: ἀγαπάω (Strong'S #25 — Verb — agapao — ag-ap-ah'-o )

and the corresponding noun agape (B, No. 1 below) present "the characteristic word of Christianity, and since the Spirit of revelation has used it to express ideas previously unknown, inquiry into its use, whether in Greek literature or in the Septuagint, throws but little light upon its distinctive meaning in the NT. Cp., however,  Leviticus 19:18;  Deuteronomy 6:5 .

 John 17:26 John 3:16 Romans 5:8 John 14:21 John 13:34 1 Thessalonians 3:12 1 Corinthians 16:14 2 Peter 1:7 1 John 4:8 1 John 4:9,10 Romans 5:8 Deuteronomy 7:7,8 2 Corinthians 5:14 Ephesians 2:4 3:19 5:2 Galatians 5:22 John 14:15,21,23 15:10 1 John 2:5 5:3 2 John 1:6 Romans 15:2 Galatians 6:10 1 Corinthians 13  Colossians 3:12-14Beloved.

A — 2: φιλέω (Strong'S #5368 — Verb — phileo — fil-eh'-o )

is to be distinguished from agapao in this, that phileo more nearly represents "tender affection." The two words are used for the "love" of the Father for the Son,  John 3:35 (No. 1); 5:20 (No. 2); for the believer,   John 14:21 (No. 1); 16:27 (No. 2); both, of Christ's "love" for a certain disciple,   John 13:23 (No. 1); 20:2 (No. 2). Yet the distinction between the two verbs remains, and they are never used indiscriminately in the same passage; if each is used with reference to the same objects, as just mentioned, each word retains its distinctive and essential character.

 1 Corinthians 16;22 Matthew 22:37 Luke 10:27 Romans 8:28 1 Corinthians 8:3 1 Peter 1:8 1 John 4:21 John 21:15-17 Revelation 12:11 John 12:25 1 Peter 3:10 Mark 12:38

B — 1: ἀγάπη (Strong'S #26 — Noun Feminine — agape — ag-ah'-pay )

the significance of which has been pointed out in connection with A, No. 1, is always rendered "love" in the RV where the AV has "charity," a rendering nowhere used in the RV; in  Romans 14:15 , where the AV has "charitably," the RV, adhering to the translation of the noun, has "in love."

 1 John 4:8,16 1 John 4:9,10 1 John 4:17

B — 2: φιλανθρωπία (Strong'S #5363 — Noun Feminine — philanthropia — fil-an-thro-pee'-ah )

denotes, lit., "love for man" (phileo and anthropos, "man"); hence, "kindness,"  Acts 28:2; in  Titus 3:4 , "(His) love toward man." Cp. the adverb philanthropos, "humanely, kindly,"  Acts 27:3 . See Kindness.

 1 Timothy 6:10Brother

Vine's Expository Dictionary of OT Words [6]

A. Verb.

'Âhab (אַהֵב, Strong'S #157), or 'Âhêb (אַהֵב, Strong'S #157), “to love; like.” This verb occurs in Moabite and Ugaritic. It appears in all periods of Hebrew and around 250 times in the Bible.

Basically this verb is equivalent to the English “to love” in the sense of having a strong emotional attachment to and desire either to possess or to be in the presence of the object. First, the word refers to the love a man has for a woman and a woman for a man. Such love is rooted in sexual desire, although as a rule it is desire within the bounds of lawful relationships: “And Isaac brought her into his mother Sarah’s tent, and took Rebekah, and she became his wife; and he loved her …” (Gen. 24:67). This word may refer to an erotic but legal love outside marriage. Such an emotion may be a desire to marry and care for the object of that love, as in the case of Shechem’s love for Dinah (Gen. 34:3). In a very few instances 'âhab (or 'âhêb ) may signify no more than pure lust—an inordinate desire to have sexual relations with its object (cf. 2 Sam. 13:1). Marriage may be consummated without the presence of love for one’s marriage partner (Gen. 29:30).

'Âhab (or 'âhêb ) seldom refers to making love (usually this is represented yada’ , “to know,” or by shakab , “to lie with”). The word does seem to have this added meaning, however, in 1 Kings 11:1: “But King Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh …” (cf. Jer. 2:25). Hosea appears to use this nuance when he writes that God told him to “go yet, love a woman beloved of her friend, yet an adulteress …” (3:1). This is the predominant meaning of the verb when it appears in the causative stem (as a participle). In every instance except one (Zech. 13:6) 'âhab (or 'âhêb ) signifies those with whom one has made or intends to make love: “Go up to Lebanon, and cry; and lift up thy voice in Bashan, and cry from the passages: for all thy lovers are destroyed” (Jer. 22:20; cf. Ezek. 16:33). 'Âhab (or 'âhêb ) is also used of the love between parents and their children. In its first biblical appearance, the word represents Abraham’s special attachment to his son Isaac: “And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest …” (Gen. 22:2). 'Âhab (or 'âhêb ) may refer to the family love experienced by a daughter-in-law toward her mother-in-law (Ruth 4:15). This kind of love is also represented by the word racham 'Âhab (or 'âhêb ) sometimes depicts a special strong attachment a servant may have toward a master under whose dominance he wishes to remain: “And if the servant shall plainly say, I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free …” (Exod. 21:5). Perhaps there is an overtone here of family love; he “loves” his master as a son “loves” his father (cf. Deut. 15:16). This emphasis may be in 1 Sam. 16:21, where we read that Saul “loved [David] greatly.” Israel came “to love” and deeply admire David so that they watched his every move with admiration (1 Sam. 18:16).

A special use of this word relates to an especially close attachment of friends: “… The soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul” (1 Sam. 18:1). In Lev. 19:18: “… Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself..” (cf. Lev. 19:34; Deut. 10:19) 'âhab (or 'âhêb ) signifies this brotherly or friendly kind of love. The word suggests, furthermore, that one seek to relate to his brother and all men according to what is specified in the law structure God gave to Israel. This was to be the normal state of affairs between men.

This verb is used politically to describe the loyalty of a vassal or a subordinate to his lord— so Hiram of Tyre “loved” David in the sense that he was completely loyal (1 Kings 5:1).

The strong emotional attachment and desire suggested by 'âhab (or 'âhêb ) may also be fixed on objects, circumstances, actions, and relationships.

B. Noun.

'Ahăbâh (אַהֲבָה, Strong'S #160), “love.” This word appears about 55 times, and it represents several kinds of “love.” The first biblical occurrence of 'ahăbâh is in Gen. 29:20; there the word deals with the “love” between man and wife as a general concept. In Hos. 3:1 the word is used of “love” as a sexual activity. 'Ahăbâh means “love” between friends in 1 Sam. 18:3: “Then Jonathan and David made a covenant because he loved him as his own soul.” The word refers to Solomon’s “love” in 1 Kings 11:2 and to God’s “love” in Deut. 7:8.

C. Participle.

'Âhab (אַהֵב, Strong'S #157), “friend.” This word used as a participle may mean “friend”: “… The rich hath many friends” (Prov. 14:20).

King James Dictionary [7]

LOVE, luv. L. libeo, lubeo. See Lief. The sense is probably to be prompt, free, willing, from leaning, advancing, or drawing forward.

1. In a general sense to be pleased with to regard with affection, on account of some qualities which excite pleasing sensations or desire of gratification. We love a friend, on account of some qualities which give us pleasure in his society. We love a man who has done us a favor in which case, gratitude enters into the composition of our affection. We love our parents and our children, on account of their connection with us, and on account of many qualities which please us. We love to retire to a cool shade in summer. We love a warm room in winter. we love to hear an eloquent advocate. The christian loves his Bible. In short, we love whatever gives us pleasure and delight, whether animal or intellectual and if our hearts are right, we love God above all things, as the sum of all excellence and all the attributes which can communicate happiness to intelligent beings. In other words, the christian loves God with the love of complacency in his attributes, the love of benevolence towards the interest of his kingdom, and the love of gratitude for favors received.

Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind -

Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.  Matthew 22 .

2. To have benevolence or good will for.  John 3 .

LOVE, n.

1. An affection of the mind excited by beauty and worth of any kind, or by the qualities of an object which communicate pleasure, sensual or intellectual. It is opposed to hatred. Love between the sexes, is a compound affection, consisting of esteem, benevolence, and animal desire. Love is excited by pleasing qualities of any kind, as by kindness, benevolence, charity, and by the qualities which render social intercourse agreeable. In the latter case, love is ardent friendship, or a strong attachment springing from good will and esteem, and the pleasure derived from the company, civilities and kindness of others.

Between certain natural relatives, love seems to be in some cases instinctive. Such is the love of a mother for her child, which manifests itself toward an infant, before any particular qualities in the child are unfolded. This affection is apparently as strong in irrational animals as in human beings.

We speak of the love of amusements, the love of books, the love of money, and the love of whatever contributes to our pleasure or supposed profit.

The love of God is the first duty of man, and this springs from just views of his attributes or excellencies of character, which afford the highest delight to the sanctified heart. Esteem and reverence constitute ingredients in this affection, and a fear of offending him is its inseparable effect.

2. Courtship chiefly in the phrase, to make love, that is, to court to woo to solicit union in marriage. 3. Patriotism the attachment one has to his native land as the love of country. 4. Benevolence good will.

God is love.  1 John 4 .

5. The object beloved.

The lover and the love of human kind.

6. A word of endearment.

Trust me, love.

7. Picturesque representation of love.

Such was his form as painters, when they show their utmost art, on naked loves bestow.

8. Lewdness.

He is not lolling on a lewd love-bed.

9. A thin silk stuff. Obs.

Love in idleness, a kind of violet.

Free of love, a plant of the genus Cercis.

Fausset's Bible Dictionary [8]

"The fulfilling of the law" ( Romans 13:8;  Romans 13:10), the prominent perfection of God ( 1 John 4:8;  1 John 4:16), manifested to us ( 1 John 4:10) when we loved not Him ( John 3:16). Passing our powers of knowledge ( Ephesians 3:19), everlasting ( Jeremiah 31:3), free and gratuitous ( Hosea 14:4), enduring to the end ( John 13:1). The two Greek words for "love" are distinct: phileo , the love of impulse, ardent affection and feeling; agapao , the love of esteem, regard.  John 21:15, "Simon, lovest (agapas , esteemest) thou Me?" Αgapas sounds too cold to Peter, now burning with love; so he replies, "Thou knowest that I LOVE (philo ) Thee." "Simon, esteemest thou (agapas ) Me? ... Thou knowest that I LOVE Thee." At the third time Peter gained his point. "Simon, LOVEST (phileis ) thou Me?" Love to one another is the proof to the world of discipleship ( John 13:35).

American Tract Society Bible Dictionary [9]

GOD IS LOVE; AND HE THAT DWELLETH IN LOVE DWELLETH IN GOD, AND GOD IN HIM,  1 John 4:16 . Love is a chief attribute of Jehovah, the length and breadth and height and depth of which are beyond comprehension, for they are infinite,  Ephesians 3:18,19 . Between the three Persons of the Godhead, love is unutterable full, perfect, and blissful; towards holy angels and Christians, God's love is an infinite fatherly complacency and affection; towards sinners, it is immeasurable compassion. It is shown in all his works and ways, and dictated his holy law, but is most signally displayed in the gospel,  John 3:16 . "Herein is love."

Holy love in man would make the whole heart and soul supremely delight in and obey God, and cordially and practically love all beings according to their character-the good with fellowship of soul, and the evil with a Christ-like benevolence. Such a love would meet and fulfil all the ends of the law,  Matthew 22:37-40   Romans 13:8-10 . Without it, none can enter heaven; and as the affections of every unrenewed heart are all mixed with sin, being given to forbidden objects, or selfishly and unduly given to objects not forbidden, we must be "born again" in order to see God,  John 3:3   1 John 4:7,19   5:4 .

People's Dictionary of the Bible [10]

Love Feasts, Agapè .  Judges 1:12;  2 Peter 2:13. A meeting accompanying the Lord's Supper in which the poorer members of the church were provided for by the contributions of Christians, but whether before or after the celebration is uncertain. Chrysostom says that after the early community of goods had ceased, the richer members brought to the church contributions of food and drink, of which, after the conclusion of the services and the celebration of the Lord's Supper, all partook together, by this means helping to promote the principle of love among Christians. The love feasts were forbidden to be held in churches by the Council of Laodicea, a.d. 320; but in some form or other they have been continued in some churches.

Charles Buck Theological Dictionary [11]

Consists in approbation of, and inclination towards an object that appears to us as good. It has been distinguished into,

1. Love of esteem, which arises from the mere consideration of some excellency in an object, and belongs either to persons or things.—

2. Love of benevolence, which is an inclination to seek the happiness or welfare of any thing.—

3. Love of complacence, which arises from the consideration of any object agreeable to us, and calculated to afford us pleasure.

Webster's Dictionary [12]

(1): ( n.) A boxing glove.

(2): ( v. t.) To cover with, or as with, a glove.

(3): ( n.) A cover for the hand, or for the hand and wrist, with a separate sheath for each finger. The latter characteristic distinguishes the glove from the mitten.

Easton's Bible Dictionary [13]

 John 21:16,17 Agapas Philo Agapan Philein

In   1 Corinthians 13 the apostle sets forth the excellency of love, as the word "charity" there is rendered in the Revised Version.

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia [14]

luv ( אהב , 'āhēbh , אהבה , 'ahăbhāh , noun; φιλέω , philéō , ἀγαπάω , agapáō , verb; ἀγάπη , agápē , noun): Love to both God and man is fundamental to true religion, whether as expressed in the Old Testament or the New Testament. Jesus Himself declared that all the law and the prophets hang upon love (  Matthew 22:40;  Mark 12:28-34 ). Paul, in his matchless ode on love ( 1 Corinthians 13:1-13 ), makes it the greatest of the graces of the Christian life - greater than speaking with tongues, or the gift of prophecy, or the possession of a faith of superior excellence; for without love all these gifts and graces, desirable and useful as they are in themselves, are as nothing, certainly of no permanent value in the sight of God. Not that either Jesus or Paul underestimates the faith from which all the graces proceed, for this grace is recognized as fundamental in all God's dealings with man and man's dealings with God ( John 6:28 f;   Hebrews 11:6 ); but both alike count that faith as but idle and worthless belief that does not manifest itself in love to both God and man. As love is the highest expression of God and His relation to mankind, so it must be the highest expression of man's relation to his Maker and to his fellow-man.

I. Definition.

While the Hebrew and Greek words for "love" have various shades and intensities of meaning, they may be summed up in some such definition as this: Love, whether used of God or man, is an earnest and anxious desire for and an active and beneficent interest ins the well-being of the one loved. Different degrees and manifestations of this affection are recognized in the Scriptures according to the circumstances and relations of life, e.g. the expression of love as between husband and wife, parent and child, brethren according to the flesh, and according to grace; between friend and enemy, and, finally, between God and man. It must not be overlooked, however, that the fundamental idea of love as expressed in the definition of it is never absent in any one of these relations of life, even though the manifestation thereof may differ according to the circumstances and relations. Christ's interview with the apostle Peter on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias ( John 21:15-18 ) sets before us in a most beautiful way the different shades of meaning as found in the New Testament words φιλέω , philéō , and ἀγαπάω , agapáō . In the question of Christ, "Lovest thou me more than these?" the Greek verb ἀαπᾶς , agapás , denotes the highest, most perfect kind of love (Latin, diligere ), implying a clear determination of will and judgment, and belonging particularly to the sphere of Divine revelation. In his answer Peter substitutes the word φιλῶ , philṓ , which means the natural human affection, with its strong feeling, or sentiment, and is never used in Scripture language to designate man's love to God. While the answer of Peter, then, claims only an inferior kind of love, as compared to the one contained in Christ's question, he nevertheless is confident of possessing at least such love for his Lord.

II. The Love of God.

First in the consideration of the subject of "love" comes the love of God - H e who is love, and from whom all love is derived. The love of God is that part of His nature - indeed His whole nature, for "God is love" - which leads Him to express Himself in terms of endearment toward His creatures, and actively to manifest that interest and affection in acts of loving care and self-sacrifice in behalf of the objects of His love. God is "love" ( 1 John 4:8 ,  1 John 4:16 ) just as truly as He is "light" ( 1 John 1:5 ), "truth" ( 1 John 1:6 ), and "spirit" ( John 4:24 ). Spirit and light are expressions of His essential nature; love is the expression of His personality corresponding to His nature. God not merely loves, but is love; it is His very nature, and He imparts this nature to be the sphere in which His children dwell, for "he that abideth in love abideth in God, and God abideth in him" ( 1 John 4:16 ). Christianity is the only religion that sets forth the Supreme Being as Love. In heathen religions He is set forth as an angry being and in constant need of appeasing.

1. Objects of God's Love:

The object of God's love is first and foremost His own Son, Jesus Christ (  Matthew 3:17;  Matthew 17:5;  Luke 20:13;  John 17:24 ). The Son shares the love of the Father in a unique sense; He is "my chosen, in whom my soul delighteth" ( Isaiah 42:1 ). There exists an eternal affection between the Son and the Father - the Son is the original and eternal object of the Father's love ( John 17:24 ). If God's love is eternal it must have an eternal object, hence, Christ is an eternal being.

God loves the believer in His Son with a special love. Those who are united by faith and love to Jesus Christ are, in a different sense from those who are not thus united, the special objects of God's love. Said Jesus, thou "lovedst them, even as thou lovedst me" (  John 17:23 ). Christ is referring to the fact that, just as the disciples had received the same treatment from the world that He had received, so they had received of the Father the same love that He Himself had received. They were not on the outskirts of God's love, but in the very center of it. "For the father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me" ( John 16:27 ). Here phileō is used for love, indicating the fatherly affection of God for the believer in Christ, His Son. This is love in a more intense form than that spoken of for the world ( John 3:16 ).

God loves the world (  John 3:16; compare  1 Timothy 2:4;  2 Peter 3:9 ). This is a wonderful truth when we realize what a world this is - a world of sin and corruption. This was a startling truth for Nicodemus to learn, who conceived of God as loving only the Jewish nation. To him, in his narrow exclusiveism, the announcement of the fact that God loved the whole world of men was startling. God loves the world of sinners lost and ruined by the fall. Yet it is this world, "weak," "ungodly," "without strength," "sinners" ( Romans 5:6-8 ), "dead in trespasses and sins" ( Ephesians 2:1 the King James Version), and unrighteous, that God so loved that He gave His only begotten Son in order to redeem it. The genesis of man's salvation lies in the love and mercy of God (  Ephesians 2:4 f). But love is more than mercy or compassion; it is active and identifies itself with its object. The love of the heavenly Father over the return of His wandering children is beautifully set forth in the parable of the Prodigal Son (Lk 15). Nor should the fact be overlooked that God loves not only the whole world, but each individual in it; it is a special as well as a general love (  John 3:16 , "whosoever";  Galatians 2:20 , "loved me, and gave himself up for me").

2. Manifestations of God's Love:

God's love is manifested by providing for the physical, mental, moral and spiritual needs of His people ( Isaiah 48:14 ,  Isaiah 48:20 ,  Isaiah 48:21;  Isaiah 62:9-12;  Isaiah 63:3 ,  Isaiah 63:12 ). In these Scriptures God is seen manifesting His power in behalf His people in the time of their wilderness journeying and their captivity. He led them, fed and clothed them, guided them and protected them from all their enemies. His love was again shown in feeling with His people, their sorrows and afflictions ( Isaiah 63:9 ); He suffered in their affliction, their interests were His; He was not their adversary but their friend, even though it might have seemed to them as if He either had brought on them their suffering or did not care about it. Nor did He ever forget them for a moment during all their trials. They thought He did; they said, "God hath forgotten us," "He hath forgotten to be gracious"; but no; a mother might forget her child that she should not have compassion on it, but God would never forget His people. How could He? Had He not graven them upon the palms of His hands ( Isaiah 49:15 f)? Rather than His love being absent in the chastisement of His people, the chastisement itself was often a proof of the presence of the Divine love, "for whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth" (  Hebrews 12:6-11 ). Loving reproof and chastisement are necessary oftentimes for growth in holiness and righteousness. Our redemption from sin is to be attributed to God's wondrous love; "Thou hast in love to my soul delivered it from the pit of corruption; for thou hast cast all my sins behind thy back" ( Isaiah 38:17; compare  Psalm 50:21;  Psalm 90:8 ).  Ephesians 2:4 f sets forth in a wonderful way how our entire salvation springs forth from _ the mercy and love of God; "But God, being rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead through our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ," etc. It is because of the love of the Father that we are granted a place in the heavenly kingdom (  Ephesians 2:6-8 ). But the supreme manifestation of the love of God, as set forth in the Scripture, is that expressed in the gift of His only-begotten Son to die for the sins of the world ( John 3:16;  Romans 5:6-8;  1 John 4:9 f), and through whom the sinful and sinning but repentant sons of men are taken into the family of God, and receive the adoption of sons (  1 John 3:1 f;   Galatians 4:4-6 ). From this wonderful love of God in Christ Jesus nothing in heaven or earth or hell, created or uncreated or to be created, shall be able to separate us ( Romans 8:37 f).

III. The Love of Man.

1. Source of Man's Love:

Whatever love there is in man, whether it be toward God or toward his fellowman, has its source in God - "Love is of God; and every one that loveth is begotten of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love" ( 1 John 4:7 f); "We love, because he first loved us" (  1 John 4:19 ). Trench, in speaking of agapē , says it is a word born within the bosom of revealed religion. Heathen writers do not use it at all, their nearest approach to it being philanthropı́a or philadelphia - the love betweeen those of the same blood. Love in the heart of man is the offspring of the love of God. Only the regenerated heart can truly love as God loves; to this higher form of love the unregenerate can lay no claim ( 1 John 4:7 ,  1 John 4:19 ,  1 John 4:21;  1 John 2:7-11;  1 John 3:10;  1 John 4:11 f). The regenerate man is able to see his fellow-man as God sees him, value him as God values him, not so much because of what he is by reason of his sin and unloveliness, but because of what, through Christ, he may become; he sees man's intrinsic worth and possibility in Christ (  2 Corinthians 5:14-17 ). This love is also created in the heart of man by the Holy Ghost ( Romans 5:5 ), and is a fruit of the Spirit ( Galatians 5:22 ). It is also stimulated by the example of the Lord Jesus Christ, who, more than anyone else, manifested to the world the spirit and nature of true love ( John 13:34;  John 15:12;  Galatians 2:20;  Ephesians 5:25-27;  1 John 4:9 f).

2. Objects of Man's Love:

God must be the first and supreme object of man's love; He must be loved with all the heart, mind, soul and strength ( Matthew 22:37 f;   Mark 12:29-34 ). In this last passage the exhortation to supreme love to God is connected with the doctrine of the unity of God ( Deuteronomy 6:4 f) - inasmuch as the Divine Being is one and indivisible, so must our love to Him be undivided. Our love to God is shown in the keeping of His commandments (  Exodus 20:6;  1 John 5:3;  2 John 1:6 ). Love is here set forth as more than a mere affection or sentiment; it is something that manifests itself, not only in obedience to known Divine commands, but also in a protecting and defense of them, and a seeking to know more and more of the will of God in order to express love for God in further obedience (compare  Deuteronomy 10:12 ). Those who love God will hate evil and all forms of worldliness, as expressed in the avoidance of the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh and the pride of life ( Psalm 97:10;  1 John 2:15-17 ). Whatever there may be in his surroundings that would draw the soul away from God and righteousness, that the child of God will avoid. Christ, being God, also claims the first place in our affections. He is to be chosen before father or mother, parent, or child, brother or sister, or friend ( Matthew 10:35-38;  Luke 14:26 ). The word "hate" in these passages does not mean to hate in the sense in which we use the word today. It is used in the sense in which Jacob is said to have "hated" Leah ( Genesis 29:31 ), that is, he loved her less than Rachel; "He loved also Rachel more than Leah" ( Genesis 29:30 ). To love Christ supremely is the test of true discipleship ( Luke 14:26 ), and is an unfailing mark of the elect ( 1 Peter 1:8 ). We prove that we are really God's children by thus loving His Son ( John 8:42 ). Absence of such love means, finally, eternal separation ( 1 Corinthians 16:22 ).

Man must love his fellow-man also. Love for the brotherhood is a natural consequence of the love of the fatherhood; for "In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother" ( 1 John 3:10 ). For a man to say "I love God" and yet hate his fellowman is to brand himself as "a liar" ( 1 John 4:20 ); "He that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, cannot love God whom he hath not seen" ( 1 John 4:20 ); he that loveth God will love his brother also ( 1 John 4:21 ). The degree in which we are to love our fellow-man is "as thyself" ( Matthew 22:39 ), according to the strict observance of law. Christ set before His followers a much higher example than that, however. According to the teaching of Jesus we are to supersede this standard: "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another; even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another" ( John 13:34 ). The exhibition of love of this character toward our fellow-man is the badge of true discipleship. It may be called the sum total of our duty toward our fellow-man, for "Love worketh no ill to his neighbor: love therefore is the fulfillment of the law"; "for he that loveth his neighbor hath fulfilled the law" ( Romans 13:8 ,  Romans 13:10 ). The qualities which should characterize the love which we are to manifest toward our fellow-men are beautifully set forth in  1 Corinthians 13:1-13 . It is patient and without envy; it is not proud or self-elated, neither does it behave discourteously; it does not cherish evil, but keeps good account of the good; it rejoices not at the downfall of an enemy or competitor, but gladly hails his success; it is hopeful, trustful and forbearing - for such there is no law, for they need none; they have fulfilled the law.

Nor should it be overlooked that our Lord commanded His children to love their enemies, those who spoke evil of them, and despitefully used them ( Matthew 5:43-48 ). They were not to render evil for evil, but contrariwise, blessing. The love of the disciple of Christ must manifest itself in supplying the necessities, not of our friends only ( 1 John 3:16-18 ), but also of our enemies ( Romans 12:20 f).

Our love should be "without hypocrisy" ( Romans 12:9 ); there should be no pretense about it; it should not be a thing of mere word or tongue, but a real experience manifesting itself in deed and truth ( 1 John 3:18 ). True love will find its expression in service to man: "Through love be servants one to another" ( Galatians 5:13 ). What more wonderful illustration can be found of ministering love than that set forth by our Lord in the ministry of foot-washing as found in Jn 13? Love bears the infirmities of the weak, does not please itself, but seeks the welfare of others ( Romans 15:1-3;  Philippians 2:21;  Galatians 6:2;  1 Corinthians 10:24 ); it surrenders things which may be innocent in themselves but which nevertheless may become a stumbling-block to others ( Romans 14:15 ,  Romans 14:21 ); it gladly forgives injuries ( Ephesians 4:32 ), and gives the place of honor to another ( Romans 12:10 ). What, then, is more vital than to possess such love? It is the fulfillment of the royal law ( James 2:8 ), and is to be put above everything else ( Colossians 3:14 ); it is the binder that holds all the other graces of the Christian life in place ( Colossians 3:14 ); by the possession of such love we know that we have passed from death unto life ( 1 John 3:14 ), and it is the supreme test of our abiding in God and God in us ( 1 John 4:12 ,  1 John 4:16 ).

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [15]

(prop. אִהֲבָה, ἀγάπη ) is an attachment of the affections to any object, accompanied with an ardent desire to promote its happiness: 1, by abstaining from all that could prove injurious to it; 2, by doing all that call promote its welfare, comfort, or interests, whether it is indifferent to these efforts, or whether it appreciates them. This is what Kant calls practical love, in contradistinction from pathological love, which is a sort of sensual self-love, and a desire for community in compliance with our own feelings. In reality, love is something personal, emanating from a personal being and directed towards another, and thus its moral or immoral character is determined by the fact of its being called forth by the real worth of the personality towards which it is directed, or by the physical appearance of the latter, or by the advantages it may offer.

In the Christian sense, as we find it spoken of in the Word of God, love is not merely a peculiar disposition of the feelings, or a direction of the will of the creature, though this also must have its root in the creative principle, in God. God is love, the original, absolute love ( 1 John 4:9). As the absolute love, he is at once subject and object, i.e., he originally loved himself, had communion with himself, imparted himself to himself, as also we see mention made of God's love before the creation of the world, the love of the Father towards the Son ( John 17:24), Derived from this love is the love which calls into being and preserves his creatures. Creatures, that is, existences which come from God, are through him and for him; not having life by themselves, but immediately dependent upon God existing by his will, and consequently to be destroyed at his will; created in time, and consequently subject to time, developing themselves in it to the full extent of their nature according to God's thoughts, with the possibility of departing therefrom, which it were impossible to suppose of God, the eternally real and active idea of himself. In regard to the creature, the divine love is the will of God to communicate to it the fullness of his life, and even the will to impart, according to its receptive faculty, this fullness into something which is not himself, yet which, as coming from God, tends also towards God, and finds its rest in him, and its happiness in doing his will. But, as emanating from an active God this love, with all its fullness, can only be directed towards a similarly organized and consequently personal creature, conscious of its relation to God and of himself as its end, possessing in itself the fullness of created life (microcosm).

It must, then, be man towards whom this divine love is directed as the object of God's delight, created after his image. This love is manifested in the earnestness of the discipline (commands and threats,  Genesis 2:17) employed to strengthen this resemblance to God, to educate man as a ruler by obedience, as also by the intercourse of God with man; and, after the fall, by the hope and confidence awakening promises, as well as in the humiliating condemnation to pain, labor, and death. All these contain evidences of love, of this will of God to hold man in his communion, or to restore him to it. At the bottom of it lies an appreciation of his worth, namely, of his inalienable resemblance to God, of the imparted divine breath. This appreciation is also the foundation of compassionate love, for it is only on this ground that man is worthy of the divine affection. But it is also the ground which renders him deserving of punishment. For punishment, this destiny of evil, which is felt as a hinderance of life, is in one respect an expiation, i.e. a retrieving of God's honor, being incurred by that disregard of the value of his communion with God, and consequently of the real life, which must be considered as injurious to the life of man, and leading him to ruin; on the other hand, it is inducement to conversion, as this consequence of sin leads man to recognize the restoration of this disturbed relation to God as the one thing needful and desirable. Punishment consequently proceeds in both cases on the assumption of the worth of man in the eve of God, and is a proof of it. Hence the anger of God, as manifested by these punishments, is but another form of his love. It is a reaction of rejected love which manifests itself in imparting suffering and pain on the one who rejects it, proving thereby that its rejection is not a matter of indifference to it. This love may not be apparent at first sight, but it is clearly revealed in God's conduct towards all mankind, as well towards the heathen as towards the chosen people. God allowed the heathen to walk in their own ways ( Acts 14:17); he allows them to fall into all manner of evil ( Romans 1:21 sq.) in order to bring them to a sense of their misery and helplessness as well as of their guilt. But at the bottom of this anger there is still love, and this is clearly shown in the fact that he manifested himself to them in their conscience, and also took care of them ( Acts 14:17;  Acts 17:25 sq.).

But, if this love is thus evinced towards the heathen, it is still more clearly manifested towards the chosen people, the fact of their choice being itself a manifestation of that love ( Deuteronomy 7:6 sq.), which is further shown both in the blessings and punishments, the anger and the mercy, of which they were the objects. Holiness and mercy are the chief characteristics of the divine love as manifested towards Israel; the one raising them above their weaknesess, their evils, and their sins; the other understanding these failings, and seeking to deliver and restore them. But in both also is manifested the constancy of that love, its faithfulness; and the exactitude with which it adheres to the covenant it had itself made evinces its righteousness by saving those who fear God and obey his commandments. Both holiness and mercy are, for the moral, religious consciousness, harmonized in the expiatory sacrifice, in a figurative, typical manner in the O.T., and in a real, absolute manner in the N.T. The divine right in regard to fallen humanity is maintained, the death penalty is paid, but in such a manner that the chief of all, the divine Son of man, who is also Son of God, suffers it for all, of his own free will, and out of love to man, in accordance with the wishes of his Father. Thus the curse of sin and death is removed from humanity, and the possibility of a new existence of righteousness and felicity restored.

The New Covenant is therefore the full revelation of the spirit and object of the divine love. The incarnation of the Son of God is the revelation of God himself, and leads to his self-impartation by the Holy Spirit. Hence the eternal love discloses itself as being, in its inner nature, the love of the Father for the Son, and of the Son for the Father by the Holy Ghost, which proceeds from both, and is the fullness of the love that unites them, whence we can say that. God is love; as also, in its manifestation, it is the divine love towards fallen creatures, which is the will to restore their perfect communion with God by means of the all-sufficient expiatory sacrifice of the God-man, and the communication of the Holy Spirit, by which both the Father and the Son come to dwell in the hearts of men, thus forming a people of God's own, as was postulated, but not yet realized in the O.T. The love of God in man, therefore, is the consciousness of being loved by God ( Romans 5:5), resulting in a powerful impulse of love towards the God who has loved us first in Christ ( 1 John 4:19), and an inward and strong affection towards all who are loved by God in Christ ( 1 John 4:11); for the divine love, even when dwelling in man, remains all- embracing. This love takes the form of a duty ( 1 John 4:11), but at the same time becomes a gradually strengthening inclination. And this is the completion or the ripening of the divine love in man (ἐν τούτῳ τετελείωται ), that it manifests itself in positive results for the advantage of others.

We find the beginning and examples of this love under the old dispensation where mention is made of desire after God, joy in him, eagerness to serve him, zeal in doing everything to please and honor him. The inclination towards those who belong to God, the holy communion of love in God, that characteristic feature of the N.T., is also foreshadowed in the O.T. by the people of God, who are regarded as one in respect to him, and whose close, absolute communion with God is represented by the image of marriage. This image is still repeated in the N.T., nevertheless in such a manner that the union is represented as not yet accomplished; for, though Christ is designated as the bridegroom and the Church as the bride, the wedding is made to coincide with the establishment of his kingdom. Thus considered, the love of God and the furtherance of the love of God are still a figurative expression. God wants the whole heart of his people: one love, one sacrifice, exclusively directed towards him, so that none other should exist beside it; and that all inclinations of love towards any creature should be comprised in it, derived from it, and return to it. On this account his love is called jealous, and he is said to be a jealous God. This jealousy of God, however, this decided requiring of an exclusive submission on the part of his people, is, on the other hand, the tenderest carefulness for their welfare, their honor, and their restoration.

The close connection, indeed the unity of both, is evident. The effect of this jealousy of God is to kindle zeal in those who serve him, and consequently opposition against all that opposes, or even does not conduce to his service. This is a manifestation of love towards God, which love is essentially a return of his own love, and consequently gratitude, accompanied by the highest appreciation, and an earnest desire for communion with him. It includes joy in all that serves God, absolute submission to him, and a desire to do everything for his glory. The love in God, i.e., the love of those who feel themselves bound together by that common bond, is essentially of the same character; but, from the fact of its being directed towards creatures who are afflicted with many failings and infirmities, must also include — as distinguished from the love towards God — a willingness to forgive, which makes away with all hinderances to full communion, a continual friendliness under all circumstances, consequently patience and gentleness, zeal for their improvement, and sympathy for their failings and misfortunes. But as the love of the creative, redemptive, and sanctifying God, extending further than merely those who have attained to that communion with him, embraces all, so should also the love of those who love God. Yet in the divine love itself there is a distinction made, inasmuch as God's love towards those who love him and keep his commandments is a strengthening, sustaining pleasure in them ( John 14:21;  John 14:23), while his love towards the others is benevolence and pity, which, according to their conduct, the disposition of their hearts. and their receptivity, is either not felt at all by them, or only produces pain, fear o, or, again, hope, desire, etc., but not a feeling of complete, abiding joy. So in the love of the children of God towards the human race we find the distinction between brotherly and universal love ( Romans 12:10;  Hebrews 13:1;  1 Peter 1:22;  2 Peter 1:7). In both we find the characteristics of kindness and benevolence, sympathy, willingness to help, gentleness, and patience; but in the universal love there is wanting the feeling of delight, of an equal aim, a complete reciprocity, of conscious unity in the one highest good.

Love also derives a special determination from the personality, the spiritual and essential organization of the one who loves, and also his particular position. It manifests itself in friendship as a powerful attraction, a hearty sympathy of feelings, a strong desire for being together and enjoying a communion of thoughts and feelings. In sexual love it is a tender reciprocal attraction, a satisfaction in each other as the mutual complement of life, and a desire for absolute and lasting community of existence. Parental, filial, and brotherly love can be considered as a branch of this affection. Both friendship and love have the full sanction of Christian morals when based on the love of God. As wedded love is an image of the relation between the Lord and his people, or the Church ( Ephesians 5:23 sq.), so paternal, filial, and brotherly love are respectively images of the love of God towards his children, of their love towards him, and of their love towards each other. All these relations may want this higher consecration, and yet be well regulated; they have then a moral character. But they may also be disorderly: friendship can be sensual, selfish, and even degenerate into unnatural sexual connection; sexual love may become selfish, having no other object but the gratification of lust; parental love may change to self-love, producing over-indulgence, and fostering the vices of the children; brotherly love can degenerate into flattery and spoiling. Thus this feeling, which in its principle and aim should be the highest and noblest, can become the most common, the worst, and the most unworthy.

Both kinds of love are mentioned in Scripture. The highest and purest tendency of the heart is in the Bible designated by the same name as the more natural, immoral, or disorderly tendency. The same was the case among the Greeks and Romans: ῎Ερως, Amor,, and Ἀφροδίτη, Venus, had both significations, the noble and the common; but Christianity has in Christ and in his Church the perfect illustration and example of true love, whose absolute type is in the triune life of God himself. This divine love, as it exists in God, and through the divine Spirit in the heart of man, together with the connection of both, is represented to us in Scripture as infinitely deep and pure. We find it thus represented in the Old Testament (see  Deuteronomy 33:3;  Isaiah 49:13 sq.;  Isaiah 57:17 sq.;  Isaiah 55:7 sq.;  Jeremiah 31:20;  Jeremiah 32:37 sq.;  Ezekiel 34:11 sq.;  Hosea 3:2 sq.;  Micah 7:18 sq.). Then in the whole mission of Christ, and in what he stated of his own love and of the Father's, see  Matthew 11:28; Luke 15;  John 4:10;  John 4:14;  John 6:37 sq.;  John 7:37 sq.;  John 9:4;  John 10:12 sq.;  John 12:35;  John 13:1;  John 15:12-13; John 17; and, for the testimony of the apostles,  Romans 5:5 sq.;  Romans 8:28 sq.;  Romans 11:29 sq.; 1 Corinthians 13;  Ephesians 1:3;  Ephesians 1:17 sq.;  Ephesians 5:1 sq.;  1 John 3:4, etc. These statements are corroborated by the testimony of Christians in all ages, who have all been witness to this love, however much their views may have differed on other points. In later times, ethical essays on the subject have thrown great light on the nature and modes of manifestation of this love; see among them, Daub, Syst. d. christl. Moral, 2:1, page 310; Marheineke, Syst. d. theol. Moral, page 470; Rothe, Theol. Elthik, 2:350. — Herzog, Real-Encyklop. 8:388 sq. See Wesleyana, page 54.

References