Difference between revisions of "Linus"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
Tags: Manual revert Reverted
Tag: Manual revert
Line 1: Line 1:
== Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament <ref name="term_56497" /> ==
<p> (Λίνος) </p> <p> This is a name which holds a large place in the history of the early Church. We first find mention of it in &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21, where St. Paul, writing from his Roman prison, conveys to his friend the greetings of Eubulus, Pudens, Linus, and Claudia. [[Linus]] was thus a friend of Paul and Timothy in the closing years of the Apostle’s life. In the <i> [[Apostolic]] Constitutions </i> (vii. 46) he is regarded as the son of [[Claudia]] of &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21 (Λίνος ὁ Κλαυδίας), which is perhaps doubtful (see articleClaudia). But the name Linus is found both in [[Irenaeus]] ( <i> c. Haer </i> . [[Iii.]] iii. 3) and in [[Eusebius]] ( <i> [[He]] </i> [Note: [[E]] Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.).]III. ii., iv. 9, xiii.), where he is regarded as the successor of St. Peter and the first bishop of Rome after the Apostles, although Tertullian ( <i> de Praescr </i> . 32) assigns this dignity to Clement. No details of any kind are given regarding the episcopate of Linus, and the date of his tenure of office is uncertain. Although Eusebius regards [[Clement]] as the successor of Linus, and Tertullian reverses the order, it is not improbable that both held office at the same time and that the episcopal power as wielded by them was of a very attenuated nature. Perhaps both held their position during the lifetime of St. Peter. According to Eusebius ( <i> [[He]] </i> [Note: [[E]] Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.).]III. xiii.) the episcopate of Linus lasted for a period of twelve years, but no dates can be fixed with any certainty. Harnack gives as probable a.d. 64-76. Linus has been regarded as the author of various works, but there is no evidence in support of this view. He is the reported author of (1) the Acts of St. Peter and St. Paul; (2) an account of St. Peter’s controversy with Simon Magus; (3) certain decrees prohibiting women from appearing in church with uncovered heads. The Roman [[Breviary]] states that he was a native of Voltena in Etruria, and that he died as a martyr of the faith, being beheaded by order of Saturninus, whose daughter he had healed of demoniacal possession. His memory is honoured by the Western Church on 23 September, and the Greek [[Menaea]] regards him as one of the Seventy. </p> <p> Literature.-J. Pearson, <i> de Serie et Successione primorum Romae Episcoporum </i> , London, 1688; [[A.]] Harnack, <i> Die Chronologic der altchristlichen Literatur </i> , Leipzig, 1897; [[J.]] [[B.]] Lightfoot, <i> Apostolic [[Fathers]] </i> , pt. i.2, 1890. </p> <p> [[W.]] [[F.]] Boyd. </p>
       
== Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible <ref name="term_52424" /> ==
<p> <strong> [[Linus.]] </strong> One of the [[Christians]] at Rome from whom St. Paul sends greetings at the end of the Second [[Epistle]] to Timothy (&nbsp; 2 Timothy 4:21 ). All writers agree that he is identical with the first [[Bishop]] of Rome. Thus Irenæus: ‘Peter and Paul, when they founded and built up the Church of Rome, committed the office of its episcopate to Linus.’ And Eusebius: ‘Of the Church of the Romans after the martyrdom of Paul and Peter, the first to be appointed to the office of Bishop was Linus, of whom Paul makes mention at the end of his letter to Timothy.’ His episcopate lasted about twelve years, but there is considerable difference of opinion as to its date. </p> <p> Morley Stevenson. </p>
       
== Fausset's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_36446" /> ==
<p> &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21 put third, "Eubulus greeteth thee, and Pudens, and Linus"; therefore not yet bishop, but a [[Christian]] then at, Rome; afterward its bishop (Irenaeus, iii. 3, section 3; Eusebius, [[H.]] [[E.]] iii. 2). Irenaeus implies that Linus was made bishop by Paul and Peter before Peter's death; but the [[Scripture]] evidence is against Peter's having been at Rome at all, and certainly before Paul's death. Pearson fixes on [[A.D.]] 55-67 as the period of Linus' episcopate. Tertullian (Praescr. Haer. 32) asserts that Clement (third bishop) also was consecrated by Peter. The statements of the fathers are mutually conflicting and unsatisfactory. </p>
       
== Smith's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_73595" /> ==
<p> '''Li'nus.''' ''(a net).'' [[A]] Christian at Rome, known to St. Paul and to Timothy, &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21, who was the first bishop of Rome, after the apostles. [[(A.D.]] 64). </p>
       
== Hawker's Poor Man's Concordance And Dictionary <ref name="term_48099" /> ==
<p> One of Paul's companions. (&nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21) </p>
       
== Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_67324" /> ==
<p> Christian at Rome whose greetings were sent to Timothy by Paul. &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21 . </p>
       
== American Tract Society Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_16560" /> ==
<p> [[A]] Christian at Rome, whose salutation Paul sent to Timothy, &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21 . </p>
       
== Holman Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_41887" /> ==
&nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21
       
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_48691" /> ==
<p> (usually Λῖνος '','' but prop. Λίνος, the name originally of a mythological and musical personage, perhaps from λίνον '', linen),'' one of the Christians at Rome whose salutations Paul sent to Timothy (&nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21). [[A.D.]] 64. He is said to have been the first bishop of Rome after the martyrdom of Peter and Paul (Irenseus, Adv. Haeres. 3:3; Eusebius. Hist. Eccles. 3:2, 4, 13, 14, 31; 5:6; comp. Jerome, De Viris. Illust. 15; Augustine, Epist. 53:2; Theodoret, ad &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21), but there is some discrepancy in the early statement respecting his date (see Heinichen a d Euseb. 3:187; Burton, Hist. of the Christ. Church; Lardner, Works, 2:31, 32, 176,187). "Eusebius and Theodoret, followed by Baronius and Tillemont (Hist. Eccles. 2:165, 591), state that he became bishop of Rome after the death of St. Peter. On the other hand, the words of Ireneus, '[Peter and Paul] when they founded and built up the Church [of Rome], committed the office of its episcopate to Linus,' certainly admit, or rather imply the meaning that he held that office before the death of St. Peter; as if the two great apostles, having, in the discharge of their own peculiar office, completed the organization of the Church at Rome, left it under the government of Linus, and passed on to preach and teach in some new region. This proceeding would be in accordance with the practice of the apostles in other places. The earlier appointment of Linus is asserted as a fact by Ruffinus (Praecf. isn Clem. Recosgn.), and by the author of chapter 46, book 7 of the Apostolic Constitutions. It is accepted as the true statement of the case by bishop Pearson (De Serie et Successione Priorum Roman Episcoporum, 2:5, § 1) and by [[Fleury]] (Hist. &nbsp;Ecclesiastes 2:26). Some persons have objected that the undistinguished mention of the name of Linus between the names of two other Roman Christians in &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:21 is a proof that he was not at that time bishop of Rome. But even Tillemont admits that such a way of introducing the bishop's name is in accordance with the simplicity of that early age. No lofty pre-eminence was attributed to the episcopal office in the apostolic times." </p> <p> According to the Roman Breviary, Linus was born at Volterra, but an old papal catalogue represents him as an Etrurian. According to tradition, he went to Rome when 22 years of age, made there the acquaintance of Peter, and was sent by him to Besanqon, in France, to preach the Gospel. After his return to Rome Peter appointed him his coadjutor; but, according to the Breviary, he was the one who prinus post Petrum gubernavit ecclesiam. He is said to have enacted, on his accession to the bishopric, that, in accordance with &nbsp;1 Corinthians 11:5, women should never enter the church with their heads uncovered. </p> <p> The duration of his episcopate is given by Eusebius (whose It. [[E.]] 3:16, and Chronicon give inconsistent evidence) as [[A.D.]] 68-80; by Tillemont, who, however, reproaches Pearson with departing from the chronology of Eusebius, as 66-78; by Baronius as 67-78; and by Pearson as 55-67. Pearson, in the treatise already quoted (1:10), gives weighty reasons for distrusting the chronology of Eusebius as regards the years of the early bishops of Rome, and he derives his own opinion from certain very ancient (but interpolated) lists of those bishops (see 1:13, and 2:5). This point has been subsequently considered by Baraterius (De Successione Antiquissima Eisc. Rome. 1740), who gives [[A.D.]] 56-67 as the date of the episcopate of Linus. </p> <p> "The statement of Ruffinus, that Linus and [[Cletus]] were bishops in Rome while St. Peter was alive, has been quoted in support of a theory which sprang up in the 17th century, received the sanction even of Hammond in his controversy with [[Blondel]] (Works, ed. 1684, 4:825; Episcopatus Jura, 5:1, § 11), was held with some slight modification by Baraterius, and has recently been revived. It is supposed that Linus was bishop in Rome only of the Christians of [[Gentile]] origin, while at the same time another bishop exercised the same authority over the [[Jewish]] Christians there. 'Tertullian's assertion (De Prescr. Haeret. § 32) that Clement [the third bishop] of Rome was consecrated by St. Peter has been quoted also as corroborating this theory, but it does not follow from the words of Tertullian that Clement's consecration took place immediately before he became bishop of Rome; and the statement of Ruffinns, so far as it lends any support to the above-named theory, is shown to be without foundation by Pearson (2:3, 4). Tilemont's observations (page 590) in reply to Pearson only show that the establishment of two contemporary bishops in one city was contemplated in ancient times as a possible provisional arrangement to meet certain temporary difficulties. The actual limitation of the authority of Linus to a section of the Church in Rome remains to be proved. Ruffinus's statement ought, doubtless, to be interpreted in accordance with that of his contemporary [[Epiphanius]] (Adv. Haer. 27:6, page 107), to the effect that Linus and Cletus were bishops of Rome in succession, not contemporaneously. The facts were, however, differently viewed, (1) by an interpolator of the Gesta Pontificum Damasi, quoted by [[J.]] Voss in his second epistle to [[A.]] Rivet (App. to Pearson's Vindiciae Ignatiane); (2) by [[Bede]] (Vita [[S.]] Benedlicti, § 7, page 146, edit. Stevenson), when he was seeking a precedent for two colltemporaneous abbots presiding in one monastery and (3) by Rabanus Malrtns (De Chorepiscopis, in Opp. ed. Migne, 4:1197), who ingeniously claims primitive authority for the institution of chorepiscopi on the suppossition that Linus and Cietus were never bishops with full powers, but were contemporaneous chorepiscopi employed by St. Peter in his absence from Rome, and at his request, to ordain clergymen for the Church at Rome." </p> <p> Linus is reckoned by Pseudo-Hippolytus, and in the Greek Menaea, among the seventy disciples. According to the Breviary, he cured the possessed, raised the dead, and was beheaded at the instigation of the consul Saturninus, although he had restored the latter's daughter from a dangerous illness. He was buried in the Vatican, by the side of St. Peter. Various days are stated by different authorities in the Western Church, and by the Eastern Church, as the day of his death. According to the most generally received tradition, he died on September 23. [[A]] narrative of the martyrdom of St. Peter and St. Paul, printed in the Bibliotheca Patrum (Paris, 1644, volume 8), and certain pontifical decrees, are incorrectly ascribed to Linus, but he is generally considered as the author of a history of Peter's dispute with Simon Magus. See Herzog, Real-Encyklop. 8:421; Lipsius, Die Papst Kataloge des Eusebius (Kiel, 1868, 8vo). </p>
       
== International Standard Bible Encyclopedia <ref name="term_5728" /> ==
<p> ''''' lī´nus ''''' ( Λίνος , <i> ''''' Lı́nos ''''' </i> (&nbsp; 2 Timothy 4:21 )): One of Paul's friends in Rome during his second and last imprisonment in that city. He was one of the few who remained faithful to the apostle, even when most of the Christians had forsaken him. And writing to Timothy when he realized that his execution could not be very far distant - for he was now ready to be offered, and the time of his departure was at hand (&nbsp;2 Timothy 4:6 ) - he sends greeting to Timothy from four friends whom he names, and Linus is one of them. There is a tradition that Linus was bishop of the church at Rome. "It is perhaps fair to assume, though of course there is no certainty of this, that the consecration of Linus to the government of the Roman church as its first bishop was one of the dying acts of the apostle Paul" [[(H.D.M.]] Spence, in Ellicott's <i> New [[Testament]] [[Commentary]] </i> on 2 Tim). </p> <p> Irenaeus - bishop of [[Lyons]] about 178 [[Ad]] - in his defense of orthodox doctrine against the [[Gnostics]] "appeals especially to the bishops of Rome, as depositories of the apostolic tradition." The list of Irenaeus commences with Linus, whom he identifies with the person of this name mentioned by Paul, and whom he states to have been "entrusted with the office of the bishopric by the apostles... With the many possibilities of error, no more can safely be assumed of Linus ... than that he held some prominent position in the Roman church" (Lightfoot's "Dissertation on the Christian Ministry," in <i> Commentary on Phil </i> , 220 f). </p> <p> "Considering the great rarity of this Greek mythological name as a proper name for persons, we can hardly doubt that here, as Irenaeus has directly asserted, the same Roman Christian is meant who, according to ancient tradition, became after Peter and Paul the first bishop of Rome. Among the mythical characters in [[Apostolical]] Constitutions, vii, 46 occurs <i> Linos ho Klaudias </i> , who is declared to have been ordained by Paul as the first bishop of Rome. He is thus represented as the son or husband of the Claudia whose name comes after his in &nbsp; 2 Timothy 4:21 . </p> <p> "These meager statements have been enlarged upon by English investigators. The Claudia mentioned here is, they hold, identical with the one who, according to Martial, married a certain [[Pudens]] (85-90 [[Ad),]] and she, in turn, with the Claudia Rufina from Britain, who is then made out to be a daughter of the British king, Cogidumnus, or Titus [[Claudius]] Cogidubnus. For a refutation of these assumptions, which, even chronologically considered, are impossible, see Lightfoot, <i> Clement </i> , [[I,]] 76-79" (Zahn, <i> Introduction to the New Testament </i> , 20). </p>
       
== Kitto's Popular Cyclopedia of Biblial Literature <ref name="term_16083" /> ==
<p> Li´nus, one of the Christians at Rome whose salutations Paul sent to Timothy . He is said to have been the first bishop of Rome after the martyrdom of Peter and Paul. </p>
       
==References ==
<references>


Linus <ref name="term_14852" />
<ref name="term_56497"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/hastings-dictionary-of-the-new-testament/linus Linus from Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament]</ref>
<p> [[Linus]] (1) accounted the first bp. of Rome after the apostles and identified by [[Irenaeus]] (iii. 2) with the Linus from whom St. Paul sent greetings to Timothy (2Ti_4:21). For the question of the order of succession of the alleged earliest bishops of Rome and. of the positions held by the persons named see [[Clemens]] [[Romanus.]] As Linus there is no difference of opinion since in all the lists he comes first. [[Eusebius]] [[(H.]] [[E.]] iii. 13) assigns 12 years to his episcopate; the Liberian Catalogue 12 years 4 months and 12 days from a.d. 55 to 67; the [[Felician]] Catalogue 11 years 3 months and 12 days. These cannot be accepted as historical nor can the statements of the last-named catalogue that he died a martyr and was buried on the [[Vatican]] beside the body of St. Peter on Sept. 24. </p> <p> Under the name of Linus are extant two tracts purporting to contain the account of the martyrdom of [[Ss.]] Peter and of Paul. These were first printed in 1517 by [[Faber]] Stapulensis as an appendix to his <i> Comm. on Saint Paul's Epistles. </i> These Acts of Linus have so many features common with the Leucian Acts [See [[Leucius]]] that the question arises whether we have not in Linus either a translation of a portion of the collection described by [[Photius]] or at least a work for which that collection supplied materials. Linus does not profess to give a complete account of the acts of the two apostles. He begins by briefly referring to (as if already known to his readers) the contest of St. Peter and Simon Magus, his imprisonments and other sufferings and labours, and then proceeds at once to the closing scenes. The stories of the martyrdom of the two apostles are quite distinct, there being no mention of Paul in the first nor of Peter in the second. The apostles' deaths are immediately brought about, not by [[Nero]] himself, but by his prefect Agrippa, a name, we may well believe, transferred by a chronological blunder from the reign of Augustus. This name, as well as some others mentioned by pseudo-Linus, occur also in the orthodox Acts of Peter and Paul published by Tischendorf and by Thilo. The alleged cause of Agrippa's animosity exhibits strongly the Encratite character common to Linus and the Leucian Acts. St. Peter, we are told, by his preaching of chastity had caused a number of matrons to leave the marriage bed of their husbands, who were thus infuriated against the apostle. </p> <p> The intention to destroy Peter is revealed by [[Marcellus]] and other disciples who pressingly entreat him to save himself by withdrawing from Rome. Among those who thus urge him are his jailors Martinianus and Processus who had already received baptism from him and who represent that the plan to destroy Peter is entirely the prefect's own and has no sanction from the emperor who seems to have forgotten all about the apostle. Then follows the well-known story of Domino quo vadis. St. Peter yields to his friends' entreaties and consents to leave Rome but at the gate he meets our Lord coming in Who on being asked whither He is going replies "To Rome in order to be crucified again." The apostle understands that in his person his [[Master]] is to be crucified and returns to suffer. Linus tells of the arrest of Peter and lays the scene of the crucifixion at the Naumachia near Nero's obelisk on the mountain. St. Peter requests to be crucified head downwards desiring out of humility not to suffer in the same way as his Master. [[A]] further reason is given, that in this way his disciples will be better able to hear his words spoken on the cross and a mystical explanation is given of the inverted position which bears a very [[Gnostic]] character. An alleged saying of our Lord is quoted which strongly resembles a passage from the [[Gospel]] according to the [[Egyptians]] cited by [[Julius]] [[Cassianus]] (Clem. Al. Strom. iii. 13 p. 553 see also Clem. Rom_2:12) "Unless ye make the right as the left the left as the right the top as the bottom and the front as the backward ye shall not know the kingdom of God." Linus relates how during Peter's crucifixion God at the request of the apostle opened the eyes of his sorrowing disciples and so turned their grief into joy. For they saw the apostle standing upright at the top of his cross crowned by angels with roses and lilies and receiving from our Lord a book out of which he reads to his disciples. This story has a good deal of affinity with that told by Leucius of a vision of our Lord during His crucifixion seen by St. John on the Mount of Olives. The story of Peter's crucifixion head downwards was in the Acts known to [[Origen]] who refers to it in his Comm. on Gen. (Eus. [[H.]] [[E.]] iii. 1). Linus relates that Marcellus took Peter's body from the cross bathed it in milk and wine and embalmed it with precious spices; but the same night as he was watching the grave the apostle appeared to him and bid him let the dead bury their dead and himself preach the kingdom of God. </p> <p> The second book, which treats of St. Paul, relates the success of his preaching at Rome. The emperor's teacher, his hearer and close friend, when he cannot converse with him, corresponds with him by letter. The emperor's attention is called to the matter by a miracle worked by Paul on his favourite cupbearer, Patroclus, of whom a story is told exactly reproducing that told of [[Eutychus]] in Acts. Nero orders St. Paul's execution, Paul turns his face to the east, offers a prayer in Hebrew, blesses the brethren, binds his eyes with a veil lent by a [[Christian]] matron, Plautilla, and presents his neck to the executioner. From his trunk there flows a stream of milk—a circumstance referred to by [[Ambrose]] and by [[Macarius]] in a work not later than <i> c. </i> 400. [[A]] dazzling light makes the soldiers unable to find the veil; returning to the gate they find that Plautilla has already received it back from Paul, who has visited her accompanied by a band of white-robed angels. The same evening, the doors being shut, Paul appears to the emperor, foretells his impending doom, and terrifies him into ordering the release of the prisoners he had apprehended. The story ends with an account of the baptism of the three soldiers who had had charge of St. Paul, and been converted by him. After his death he directs them to go to his grave, where they find [[Ss.]] Luke and Titus praying and receive baptism at their hands. </p> <p> [[Lipsius]] infers, from the coincidences of the tolerably numerous [[N.T.]] citations in Linus with the Vulg., that our present Latin Linus must be later than Jerome; but he does not seem to have appreciated the conservative character of Jerome's revision or to have consulted the older versions. We have found no coincidence with the Vulg. which is not equally a coincidence with an older version; and in one case, "relinque mortuos sepelire mortuos suos," the text agrees with the quotations of Ambrose, Jerome's translation being "dimitte." We conjecture the compiler to have been a Manichean, but he is quite orthodox in his views as to the work of creation, the point on which Gnostic speculation was most apt to go astray. </p> <p> [[[G.S.]]] </p>
       
 
<ref name="term_52424"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/hastings-dictionary-of-the-bible/linus Linus from Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible]</ref>
== References ==
       
<references>
<ref name="term_36446"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/fausset-s-bible-dictionary/linus Linus from Fausset's Bible Dictionary]</ref>
<ref name="term_14852"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/a-dictionary-of-early-christian-biography/linus+(1) Linus from A Dictionary of Early Christian Biography]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_73595"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/smith-s-bible-dictionary/linus Linus from Smith's Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_48099"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/hawker-s-poor-man-s-concordance-and-dictionary/linus Linus from Hawker's Poor Man's Concordance And Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_67324"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/morrish-bible-dictionary/linus Linus from Morrish Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_16560"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/american-tract-society-bible-dictionary/linus Linus from American Tract Society Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_41887"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/holman-bible-dictionary/linus Linus from Holman Bible Dictionary]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_48691"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/linus Linus from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_5728"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/international-standard-bible-encyclopedia/linus Linus from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia]</ref>
       
<ref name="term_16083"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/kitto-s-popular-cyclopedia-of-biblial-literature/linus Linus from Kitto's Popular Cyclopedia of Biblial Literature]</ref>
       
</references>
</references>

Revision as of 22:26, 12 October 2021

Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament [1]

(Λίνος)

This is a name which holds a large place in the history of the early Church. We first find mention of it in  2 Timothy 4:21, where St. Paul, writing from his Roman prison, conveys to his friend the greetings of Eubulus, Pudens, Linus, and Claudia. Linus was thus a friend of Paul and Timothy in the closing years of the Apostle’s life. In the Apostolic Constitutions (vii. 46) he is regarded as the son of Claudia of  2 Timothy 4:21 (Λίνος ὁ Κλαυδίας), which is perhaps doubtful (see articleClaudia). But the name Linus is found both in Irenaeus ( c. Haer . Iii. iii. 3) and in Eusebius ( He [Note: E Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.).]III. ii., iv. 9, xiii.), where he is regarded as the successor of St. Peter and the first bishop of Rome after the Apostles, although Tertullian ( de Praescr . 32) assigns this dignity to Clement. No details of any kind are given regarding the episcopate of Linus, and the date of his tenure of office is uncertain. Although Eusebius regards Clement as the successor of Linus, and Tertullian reverses the order, it is not improbable that both held office at the same time and that the episcopal power as wielded by them was of a very attenuated nature. Perhaps both held their position during the lifetime of St. Peter. According to Eusebius ( He [Note: E Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.).]III. xiii.) the episcopate of Linus lasted for a period of twelve years, but no dates can be fixed with any certainty. Harnack gives as probable a.d. 64-76. Linus has been regarded as the author of various works, but there is no evidence in support of this view. He is the reported author of (1) the Acts of St. Peter and St. Paul; (2) an account of St. Peter’s controversy with Simon Magus; (3) certain decrees prohibiting women from appearing in church with uncovered heads. The Roman Breviary states that he was a native of Voltena in Etruria, and that he died as a martyr of the faith, being beheaded by order of Saturninus, whose daughter he had healed of demoniacal possession. His memory is honoured by the Western Church on 23 September, and the Greek Menaea regards him as one of the Seventy.

Literature.-J. Pearson, de Serie et Successione primorum Romae Episcoporum , London, 1688; A. Harnack, Die Chronologic der altchristlichen Literatur , Leipzig, 1897; J. B. Lightfoot, Apostolic Fathers , pt. i.2, 1890.

W. F. Boyd.

Hastings' Dictionary of the Bible [2]

Linus. One of the Christians at Rome from whom St. Paul sends greetings at the end of the Second Epistle to Timothy (  2 Timothy 4:21 ). All writers agree that he is identical with the first Bishop of Rome. Thus Irenæus: ‘Peter and Paul, when they founded and built up the Church of Rome, committed the office of its episcopate to Linus.’ And Eusebius: ‘Of the Church of the Romans after the martyrdom of Paul and Peter, the first to be appointed to the office of Bishop was Linus, of whom Paul makes mention at the end of his letter to Timothy.’ His episcopate lasted about twelve years, but there is considerable difference of opinion as to its date.

Morley Stevenson.

Fausset's Bible Dictionary [3]

 2 Timothy 4:21 put third, "Eubulus greeteth thee, and Pudens, and Linus"; therefore not yet bishop, but a Christian then at, Rome; afterward its bishop (Irenaeus, iii. 3, section 3; Eusebius, H. E. iii. 2). Irenaeus implies that Linus was made bishop by Paul and Peter before Peter's death; but the Scripture evidence is against Peter's having been at Rome at all, and certainly before Paul's death. Pearson fixes on A.D. 55-67 as the period of Linus' episcopate. Tertullian (Praescr. Haer. 32) asserts that Clement (third bishop) also was consecrated by Peter. The statements of the fathers are mutually conflicting and unsatisfactory.

Smith's Bible Dictionary [4]

Li'nus. (a net). A Christian at Rome, known to St. Paul and to Timothy,  2 Timothy 4:21, who was the first bishop of Rome, after the apostles. (A.D. 64).

Hawker's Poor Man's Concordance And Dictionary [5]

One of Paul's companions. ( 2 Timothy 4:21)

Morrish Bible Dictionary [6]

Christian at Rome whose greetings were sent to Timothy by Paul.  2 Timothy 4:21 .

American Tract Society Bible Dictionary [7]

A Christian at Rome, whose salutation Paul sent to Timothy,  2 Timothy 4:21 .

Holman Bible Dictionary [8]

 2 Timothy 4:21

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [9]

(usually Λῖνος , but prop. Λίνος, the name originally of a mythological and musical personage, perhaps from λίνον , linen), one of the Christians at Rome whose salutations Paul sent to Timothy ( 2 Timothy 4:21). A.D. 64. He is said to have been the first bishop of Rome after the martyrdom of Peter and Paul (Irenseus, Adv. Haeres. 3:3; Eusebius. Hist. Eccles. 3:2, 4, 13, 14, 31; 5:6; comp. Jerome, De Viris. Illust. 15; Augustine, Epist. 53:2; Theodoret, ad  2 Timothy 4:21), but there is some discrepancy in the early statement respecting his date (see Heinichen a d Euseb. 3:187; Burton, Hist. of the Christ. Church; Lardner, Works, 2:31, 32, 176,187). "Eusebius and Theodoret, followed by Baronius and Tillemont (Hist. Eccles. 2:165, 591), state that he became bishop of Rome after the death of St. Peter. On the other hand, the words of Ireneus, '[Peter and Paul] when they founded and built up the Church [of Rome], committed the office of its episcopate to Linus,' certainly admit, or rather imply the meaning that he held that office before the death of St. Peter; as if the two great apostles, having, in the discharge of their own peculiar office, completed the organization of the Church at Rome, left it under the government of Linus, and passed on to preach and teach in some new region. This proceeding would be in accordance with the practice of the apostles in other places. The earlier appointment of Linus is asserted as a fact by Ruffinus (Praecf. isn Clem. Recosgn.), and by the author of chapter 46, book 7 of the Apostolic Constitutions. It is accepted as the true statement of the case by bishop Pearson (De Serie et Successione Priorum Roman Episcoporum, 2:5, § 1) and by Fleury (Hist.  Ecclesiastes 2:26). Some persons have objected that the undistinguished mention of the name of Linus between the names of two other Roman Christians in  2 Timothy 4:21 is a proof that he was not at that time bishop of Rome. But even Tillemont admits that such a way of introducing the bishop's name is in accordance with the simplicity of that early age. No lofty pre-eminence was attributed to the episcopal office in the apostolic times."

According to the Roman Breviary, Linus was born at Volterra, but an old papal catalogue represents him as an Etrurian. According to tradition, he went to Rome when 22 years of age, made there the acquaintance of Peter, and was sent by him to Besanqon, in France, to preach the Gospel. After his return to Rome Peter appointed him his coadjutor; but, according to the Breviary, he was the one who prinus post Petrum gubernavit ecclesiam. He is said to have enacted, on his accession to the bishopric, that, in accordance with  1 Corinthians 11:5, women should never enter the church with their heads uncovered.

The duration of his episcopate is given by Eusebius (whose It. E. 3:16, and Chronicon give inconsistent evidence) as A.D. 68-80; by Tillemont, who, however, reproaches Pearson with departing from the chronology of Eusebius, as 66-78; by Baronius as 67-78; and by Pearson as 55-67. Pearson, in the treatise already quoted (1:10), gives weighty reasons for distrusting the chronology of Eusebius as regards the years of the early bishops of Rome, and he derives his own opinion from certain very ancient (but interpolated) lists of those bishops (see 1:13, and 2:5). This point has been subsequently considered by Baraterius (De Successione Antiquissima Eisc. Rome. 1740), who gives A.D. 56-67 as the date of the episcopate of Linus.

"The statement of Ruffinus, that Linus and Cletus were bishops in Rome while St. Peter was alive, has been quoted in support of a theory which sprang up in the 17th century, received the sanction even of Hammond in his controversy with Blondel (Works, ed. 1684, 4:825; Episcopatus Jura, 5:1, § 11), was held with some slight modification by Baraterius, and has recently been revived. It is supposed that Linus was bishop in Rome only of the Christians of Gentile origin, while at the same time another bishop exercised the same authority over the Jewish Christians there. 'Tertullian's assertion (De Prescr. Haeret. § 32) that Clement [the third bishop] of Rome was consecrated by St. Peter has been quoted also as corroborating this theory, but it does not follow from the words of Tertullian that Clement's consecration took place immediately before he became bishop of Rome; and the statement of Ruffinns, so far as it lends any support to the above-named theory, is shown to be without foundation by Pearson (2:3, 4). Tilemont's observations (page 590) in reply to Pearson only show that the establishment of two contemporary bishops in one city was contemplated in ancient times as a possible provisional arrangement to meet certain temporary difficulties. The actual limitation of the authority of Linus to a section of the Church in Rome remains to be proved. Ruffinus's statement ought, doubtless, to be interpreted in accordance with that of his contemporary Epiphanius (Adv. Haer. 27:6, page 107), to the effect that Linus and Cletus were bishops of Rome in succession, not contemporaneously. The facts were, however, differently viewed, (1) by an interpolator of the Gesta Pontificum Damasi, quoted by J. Voss in his second epistle to A. Rivet (App. to Pearson's Vindiciae Ignatiane); (2) by Bede (Vita S. Benedlicti, § 7, page 146, edit. Stevenson), when he was seeking a precedent for two colltemporaneous abbots presiding in one monastery and (3) by Rabanus Malrtns (De Chorepiscopis, in Opp. ed. Migne, 4:1197), who ingeniously claims primitive authority for the institution of chorepiscopi on the suppossition that Linus and Cietus were never bishops with full powers, but were contemporaneous chorepiscopi employed by St. Peter in his absence from Rome, and at his request, to ordain clergymen for the Church at Rome."

Linus is reckoned by Pseudo-Hippolytus, and in the Greek Menaea, among the seventy disciples. According to the Breviary, he cured the possessed, raised the dead, and was beheaded at the instigation of the consul Saturninus, although he had restored the latter's daughter from a dangerous illness. He was buried in the Vatican, by the side of St. Peter. Various days are stated by different authorities in the Western Church, and by the Eastern Church, as the day of his death. According to the most generally received tradition, he died on September 23. A narrative of the martyrdom of St. Peter and St. Paul, printed in the Bibliotheca Patrum (Paris, 1644, volume 8), and certain pontifical decrees, are incorrectly ascribed to Linus, but he is generally considered as the author of a history of Peter's dispute with Simon Magus. See Herzog, Real-Encyklop. 8:421; Lipsius, Die Papst Kataloge des Eusebius (Kiel, 1868, 8vo).

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia [10]

lī´nus ( Λίνος , Lı́nos (  2 Timothy 4:21 )): One of Paul's friends in Rome during his second and last imprisonment in that city. He was one of the few who remained faithful to the apostle, even when most of the Christians had forsaken him. And writing to Timothy when he realized that his execution could not be very far distant - for he was now ready to be offered, and the time of his departure was at hand ( 2 Timothy 4:6 ) - he sends greeting to Timothy from four friends whom he names, and Linus is one of them. There is a tradition that Linus was bishop of the church at Rome. "It is perhaps fair to assume, though of course there is no certainty of this, that the consecration of Linus to the government of the Roman church as its first bishop was one of the dying acts of the apostle Paul" (H.D.M. Spence, in Ellicott's New Testament Commentary on 2 Tim).

Irenaeus - bishop of Lyons about 178 Ad - in his defense of orthodox doctrine against the Gnostics "appeals especially to the bishops of Rome, as depositories of the apostolic tradition." The list of Irenaeus commences with Linus, whom he identifies with the person of this name mentioned by Paul, and whom he states to have been "entrusted with the office of the bishopric by the apostles... With the many possibilities of error, no more can safely be assumed of Linus ... than that he held some prominent position in the Roman church" (Lightfoot's "Dissertation on the Christian Ministry," in Commentary on Phil , 220 f).

"Considering the great rarity of this Greek mythological name as a proper name for persons, we can hardly doubt that here, as Irenaeus has directly asserted, the same Roman Christian is meant who, according to ancient tradition, became after Peter and Paul the first bishop of Rome. Among the mythical characters in Apostolical Constitutions, vii, 46 occurs Linos ho Klaudias , who is declared to have been ordained by Paul as the first bishop of Rome. He is thus represented as the son or husband of the Claudia whose name comes after his in   2 Timothy 4:21 .

"These meager statements have been enlarged upon by English investigators. The Claudia mentioned here is, they hold, identical with the one who, according to Martial, married a certain Pudens (85-90 Ad), and she, in turn, with the Claudia Rufina from Britain, who is then made out to be a daughter of the British king, Cogidumnus, or Titus Claudius Cogidubnus. For a refutation of these assumptions, which, even chronologically considered, are impossible, see Lightfoot, Clement , I, 76-79" (Zahn, Introduction to the New Testament , 20).

Kitto's Popular Cyclopedia of Biblial Literature [11]

Li´nus, one of the Christians at Rome whose salutations Paul sent to Timothy . He is said to have been the first bishop of Rome after the martyrdom of Peter and Paul.

References