Difference between revisions of "Lasharon"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Fausset's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_36375" /> == | == Fausset's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_36375" /> == | ||
<p> A [[Canaanite]] town, the king of which Joshua slew (Joshua 12:18), probably now Saruneh, S.W. of Tiberius. The | <p> A [[Canaanite]] town, the king of which Joshua slew ( Joshua 12:18), probably now Saruneh, S.W. of Tiberius. The '''''La-''''' prefix marks the district, its absence the town (Gesenius). In the [[Egyptian]] traveler's account (Hieratic papyrus, British Museum, 1842) Saruna answers to Saruneh; now Sirin in the region called Sarona, between Mount [[Tabor]] and lake Tiberius. </p> | ||
== Smith's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_73619" /> == | == Smith's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_73619" /> == | ||
<p> Lasha'ron. ( | <p> '''Lasha'ron.''' ''(The Plain).'' One of the Canaanite towns, whose kings were killed by Joshua. Joshua 12:18. </p> | ||
== Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_67338" /> == | == Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_67338" /> == | ||
<p> | <p> Canaanite city captured by Joshua. Joshua 12:18 . Identified by some with <i> Sarona, </i> 32 43' N, 35 28' E . </p> | ||
== Holman Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_42010" /> == | == Holman Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_42010" /> == | ||
Joshua 12:18 <i> L </i> [[Aphek]] | Joshua 12:18 <i> L </i> [[Aphek]] | ||
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_47925" /> == | == Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_47925" /> == | ||
<p> [many Lasha'ron] (Heb. Lashsharon', לִשָּׁרוֹן, signif. unknown; Sept. Λεσαρών , but almost all copies omit; Vulg. Sarmon, but in the Benedictine text Lassaron), one of the [[Canaanitish]] towns whose kings were killed by Joshua (Joshua 12:18). "Some difference of opinion has been expressed as to whether the first syllable is an integral part of the name or the [[Hebrew]] preposition with the art. implied (see Keil, Josua, ad loc.). But there seems to be no warrant for supposing the existence of a particle before this one name, which certainly does not exist before either of the other thirty names in the list. Such, at least, is the conclusion of Bochart (Hieroz. 1, chapter 31), Reland (Palaest. 871), and others, a conclusion supported by the reading of the Targum, and the Arabic Version, and also by Jerome, if the Benedictine text can be relied on. The opposite conclusion of the Vulgate, given above, is adopted by [[Gesenius]] (Thesaurus, page 642, b), but not on very clear grounds, his chief argument being apparently that, as the name of a town, [[Sharon]] would not require the article affixed, which, as that of a district, it always bears. The name has vanished from both the Vat. and Alex. MSS. of the Sept., unless a trace exists in the | <p> [many Lasha'ron] (Heb. Lashsharon', '''''לִשָּׁרוֹן''''' , signif. unknown; Sept. '''''Λεσαρών''''' '','' but almost all copies omit; Vulg. ''Sarmon,'' but in the Benedictine text ''Lassaron),'' one of the [[Canaanitish]] towns whose kings were killed by Joshua ( Joshua 12:18). "Some difference of opinion has been expressed as to whether the first syllable is an integral part of the name or the [[Hebrew]] preposition with the art. implied (see Keil, ''Josua,'' ad loc.). But there seems to be no warrant for supposing the existence of a particle before this one name, which certainly does not exist before either of the other thirty names in the list. Such, at least, is the conclusion of Bochart ''(Hieroz.'' 1, chapter 31), Reland ''(Palaest.'' 871), and others, a conclusion supported by the reading of the Targum, and the Arabic Version, and also by Jerome, if the Benedictine text can be relied on. The opposite conclusion of the Vulgate, given above, is adopted by [[Gesenius]] ''(Thesaurus,'' page 642, b), but not on very clear grounds, his chief argument being apparently that, as the name of a town, [[Sharon]] would not require the article affixed, which, as that of a district, it always bears. The name has vanished from both the Vat. and Alex. MSS. of the Sept., unless a trace exists in the '''''Ο᾿Φεκτησαρώκ''''' of the Vat." (Smith). Masius supposes [[Lasharon]] to be the place mentioned in Acts 9:35, where the reading of some MSS. is '''''Ἀσσάρωνα''''' instead of '''''Σάρωνα''''' ; but there is no evidence to support such a view. From the fact that in Joshua it is named between Aphek and Madon, a writer in Fairbairn's ''Dictionary'' argues for a position at the modern ''Saruneh,'' south-east of [[Tiberias]] (Robinson, ''Bibl. Res.'' 3, Appendix, page 131); but the reasoning is wholly inconclusive, and the location utterly out of the question. Lasharon was possibly the same place with the [[Lasha]] of Genesis 10:19. </p> | ||
==References == | ==References == | ||
Latest revision as of 10:01, 15 October 2021
Fausset's Bible Dictionary [1]
A Canaanite town, the king of which Joshua slew ( Joshua 12:18), probably now Saruneh, S.W. of Tiberius. The La- prefix marks the district, its absence the town (Gesenius). In the Egyptian traveler's account (Hieratic papyrus, British Museum, 1842) Saruna answers to Saruneh; now Sirin in the region called Sarona, between Mount Tabor and lake Tiberius.
Smith's Bible Dictionary [2]
Lasha'ron. (The Plain). One of the Canaanite towns, whose kings were killed by Joshua. Joshua 12:18.
Morrish Bible Dictionary [3]
Canaanite city captured by Joshua. Joshua 12:18 . Identified by some with Sarona, 32 43' N, 35 28' E .
Holman Bible Dictionary [4]
Joshua 12:18 L Aphek
Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [5]
[many Lasha'ron] (Heb. Lashsharon', לִשָּׁרוֹן , signif. unknown; Sept. Λεσαρών , but almost all copies omit; Vulg. Sarmon, but in the Benedictine text Lassaron), one of the Canaanitish towns whose kings were killed by Joshua ( Joshua 12:18). "Some difference of opinion has been expressed as to whether the first syllable is an integral part of the name or the Hebrew preposition with the art. implied (see Keil, Josua, ad loc.). But there seems to be no warrant for supposing the existence of a particle before this one name, which certainly does not exist before either of the other thirty names in the list. Such, at least, is the conclusion of Bochart (Hieroz. 1, chapter 31), Reland (Palaest. 871), and others, a conclusion supported by the reading of the Targum, and the Arabic Version, and also by Jerome, if the Benedictine text can be relied on. The opposite conclusion of the Vulgate, given above, is adopted by Gesenius (Thesaurus, page 642, b), but not on very clear grounds, his chief argument being apparently that, as the name of a town, Sharon would not require the article affixed, which, as that of a district, it always bears. The name has vanished from both the Vat. and Alex. MSS. of the Sept., unless a trace exists in the Ο᾿Φεκτησαρώκ of the Vat." (Smith). Masius supposes Lasharon to be the place mentioned in Acts 9:35, where the reading of some MSS. is Ἀσσάρωνα instead of Σάρωνα ; but there is no evidence to support such a view. From the fact that in Joshua it is named between Aphek and Madon, a writer in Fairbairn's Dictionary argues for a position at the modern Saruneh, south-east of Tiberias (Robinson, Bibl. Res. 3, Appendix, page 131); but the reasoning is wholly inconclusive, and the location utterly out of the question. Lasharon was possibly the same place with the Lasha of Genesis 10:19.
