Difference between revisions of "Joãɠâ¤Chim"
From BiblePortal Wikipedia
(Created page with "Joãɠâ¤Chim <ref name="term_46021" /> <p> Jo ä chim </p> <p> ( Ι᾿ωακείμ ), a Graecized form of the Heb. name JEHOIAKIM, and applied in the Apocrypha to </p>...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Joãɠâ¤Chim <ref name="term_46021" /> | |||
<p> Jo | Joãɠâ¤Chim <ref name="term_46021" /> | ||
==References == | <p> Jo '''''Ä''''' chim </p> <p> ( '''''Ι᾿Ωακείμ''''' ), a Graecized form of the Heb. name [[Jehoiakim]] and applied in the [[Apocrypha]] to </p> <p> '''1.''' The king of Judah, son of [[Josiah]] ( Baruch 1:3). </p> <p> '''2.''' A priest ( '''''Ὁ''''' '''''Ἱερεύς''''' , A.V. "high priest"), said to be son of [[Hilkiah]] at the time of the burning of [[Jerusalem]] by the [[Babylonians]] ( Baruch 1:7). (See Joacim), 4. As no such pontiff occurs at this time, (See [[High Priest]]), the person intended may perhaps have been not the successor, but only a junior son of Hilkiah '''''—''''' if, indeed, the whole narrative be not spurious. (See [[Baruch]]). </p> | ||
== References == | |||
<references> | <references> | ||
<ref name="term_46021"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/joãɠâ¤chim Joãɠâ¤Chim from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | <ref name="term_46021"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/joãɠâ¤chim Joãɠâ¤Chim from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:53, 15 October 2021
Joãɠâ¤Chim [1]
Jo Ä chim
( Ι᾿Ωακείμ ), a Graecized form of the Heb. name Jehoiakim and applied in the Apocrypha to
1. The king of Judah, son of Josiah ( Baruch 1:3).
2. A priest ( Ὁ Ἱερεύς , A.V. "high priest"), said to be son of Hilkiah at the time of the burning of Jerusalem by the Babylonians ( Baruch 1:7). (See Joacim), 4. As no such pontiff occurs at this time, (See High Priest), the person intended may perhaps have been not the successor, but only a junior son of Hilkiah — if, indeed, the whole narrative be not spurious. (See Baruch).
