Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Martyr"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
705 bytes added ,  21:01, 12 October 2021
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament <ref name="term_56633" /> ==
== Hastings' Dictionary of the New Testament <ref name="term_56633" /> ==
<p> <b> 1. The name. </b> -‘Martyr’ is given as the rendering of μάρτυς in the Revised Versiononly in Revelation 17:6. The word is used in practically the same sense in Revelation 2:13 (Antipas) and Acts 22:20 (Stephen), but is in both passages translated ‘ <b> witness </b> .’ As Jesus is said to have ‘witnessed’ by accepting death (Revelation 1:5; cf. 1 Timothy 6:13), the expression was appropriately transferred to His followers who suffered for Him. The absolute use of μαρτυρία and μαρτυρεῖν to signify this did not become fixed until the middle of the 2nd cent. (see J. B. Lightfoot on Clem. <i> ad Cor </i> . v. in <i> [[Apostolic]] [[Fathers]] </i> , I. ii. [1890] 26). </p> <p> <b> 2. The position of Christians. </b> -Our Lord warned His disciples that active hostility would be the normal attitude of the world toward the Church (Matthew 5:11). The Apostolic [[Age]] provided a continuous commentary on this saying. It is customary to distinguish one or two epochs in that period as moments of great persecution. But this must not obscure the truth that persecution seldom ceased altogether. In the first days of the Church this was exclusively the work of Jews. Besides the attacks mentioned in the Acts there were others to which we have only passing allusions ( <i> e.g. </i> 1 Thessalonians 2:14, James 2:6; James 5:10, Hebrews 10:34). These prove that the Jews, not only of Palestine, but also of the Dispersion, were active in compelling [[Christians]] to pay for their faith by enduring legal and social oppression. The Romans did not at first discriminate between [[Jews]] and Christians, and extended to the latter the privileged toleration accorded to the former. This confusion of thought appears in the statement of Suetonius ( <i> Claud. </i> 25) that [[Jewish]] disorders were provoked by ‘Chrestus,’ and in the notion of [[Lysias]] that St. Paul was one of the [[Zealots]] (Acts 21:38). But under [[Nero]] the Imperial policy changed. The mere profession of [[Christianity]] now became matter for a capital charge (see this maintained in Hardy, <i> Studies in [[Roman]] History </i> , ch. iv., as against Ramsay, in <i> Church in the Roman [[Empire]] </i> 5, ch. xi. sect. 7). By both people and rulers it was held to involve ‘odium humani generis.’ It incurred popular hatred because of the divisions which it introduced into family and social life. It became a political crime through its incompatibility with Caesar-worship, its refusal to ‘worship the image of the beast’ (Revelation 13:15), which led the Roman authorities to regard it as anarchy. No special laws were passed against it, but there were standing police orders that it should be suppressed. This policy was steadily maintained, and such a reference as that made by Pliny in his letter to [[Trajan]] ( <i> Epp. </i> x. 97) concerning an unknown persecution in [[Bithynia]] twenty years before shows that there must have been much official activity against Christians of which no record survives. The NT reflects the consciousness of the change in the attitude of the government. In Acts Rome is the power which protects Christians against Jewish assault (Acts 25:10); in the [[Apocalypse]] Rome is drunk with the blood of the saints (Revelation 17:6). </p> <p> <b> 3. The number of the martyrs. </b> -Later ages naturally tended to exaggerate this in order to add glory to the Church. It was held that the truest following of Christ was found among those who had been put to death for His name. Legends grew up which in time invested every member of the apostolic college with the martyr’s halo (a collection of these stories may be seen in the <i> Ante-Nicene [[Christian]] [[Library]] </i> , vol. xvi. [1873]). It is instructive to note that Clem. Alex. ( <i> Strom. </i> iv. 9) quotes an early protest against supposing that salvation belonged to martyrs only, which is justified by citing the instances of some of the apostles who had died a natural death. But it remains true that the Biblical and other records leave the impression that great numbers of believers were slain in the 1st century. In the Jewish persecution [[Saul]] is said to have entered into every house (Acts 8:3), and to have searched every synagogue for Christians. The number of converts was already considerable in [[Jerusalem]] (cf. Acts 2:41; Acts 2:47; Acts 6:7), so that, unless we hold (with R. B. Rackham, <i> Acts of the [[Apostles]] </i> , 1901) that he pursued [[Hellenists]] only, the list of sufferers must have been very large. Imprisonment, beating, and even death, the Romans presumably conniving, were the penalties incurred (Acts 22:4-5; Acts 22:19). On this occasion the leaders of the Church seem to have escaped, but the next onslaught affected them specially (Acts 12). James the son of [[Zebedee]] fell, and Peter was cast into prison. These attacks left a lasting impression on the Church (cf. 1 Thessalonians 2:14). </p> <p> Still heavier was the toll of martyrs exacted by the Roman persecutions of the 1st century. Tacitus ( <i> Ann. </i> xv. 44) speaks of a <i> multitudo ingens </i> of victims in the Neronian outbreak, and to this answers the πολὺ πλῆθος of Clem. Rom. ( <i> ad Cor. </i> vi.). In Revelation 13:7 testimony is borne to the thoroughness with which the whole of the Empire was made to feel the effects of this policy. The same impression is conveyed by 1 Peter 5:8-9. The adversary’s rage is like the fury of a lion; all over the Roman world Christians are united in a community of suffering. It is noteworthy that both Jewish and [[Gentile]] persecutors seem to have found a special object of attack in the Christian prophets, who were no doubt brought into prominence by their preaching of the gospel (cf. 1 Thessalonians 2:15, Revelation 16:6; Revelation 18:24). The horrors inflicted by the Roman torturers may be gathered from the two passages of Tacitus and [[Clement]] mentioned above. The victims were crucified, or, by a diabolical refinement of cruelty, clad in the skins of beasts to serve as the quarry of dogs. At nightfall they were smeared with pitch to stand as living torches in the gardens of Nero. For women there were brutalities more shameful than death. </p> <p> <b> 4. The historic martyrs. </b> -Among those who were done to death in the Jewish persecutions mentioned in the Acts the names of two only are preserved-Stephen, and James the son of Zebedee. [[Stephen]] was nominally charged with blasphemy, but the proceedings were no trial in any legal sense, and, if the [[Sanhedrin]] were ever called to account for them, they doubtless pleaded that a sudden and uncontrollable tumult had occurred. Of the martyrdom of James the account is in Acts 12:2 and in Eusebius, <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> ii. 9, quoting Clement of Alexandria. James was beheaded, and his bearing so impressed his accuser that it converted him, and he suffered with the apostle. This must have been before a.d. 44, as in that year [[Herod]] [[Agrippa]] died. Attempts have recently been made ( <i> e.g. </i> by W. Bousset, <i> Die Offenbarung Johannis </i> 5, 1896, pp. 47-8) to establish the allegation of [[Philip]] of Side that [[Papias]] had said that John the [[Apostle]] was slain with his brother. But if this were so, the silence of Acts 12:2 is incomprehensible. We have no reason to suppose that John died anything but a natural death. The stories of his escape from the boiling cauldron before the Latin Gate, and of his drinking poison without harm, come from [[Gnostic]] <i> Acta Johannis </i> of the 2nd century. Some years after the passion of the first James, another James, ‘the Lord’s brother,’ was murdered (? a.d. 61). Ananus, the high priest, in the interval between the death of [[Festus]] and the arrival of Albinus, caused him to be stoned. The dramatic account of his end given by [[Hegesippus]] is preserved in Eusebius, <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> ii. 23. A shorter and more authentic record may be found in Josephus, <i> Ant. </i> XX. ix. 1 (see J. B. Mayor, <i> Ep. of St. James </i> 3, 1910, p. xxxix). </p> <p> In Rome the first shadow of the Neronian persecution fell upon Pomponia Graecina. The evidence of the [[Catacombs]] has made it almost certain that the ‘foreign superstition’ with which she was charged (Tac. <i> Ann. </i> xiii. 32) was Christianity (cf. Lightfoot, <i> Apostolic Fathers </i> , I. i. 30). Her trial resulted in her acquittal (a.d. 57). Seven years later Rome was burnt, and Nero turned the popular rage against the Christians. His success cost the Church on earth the lives not only of a great host of unknown saints but also of St. Peter and St. Paul. Lightfoot points out (on Clem. Rom. <i> ad Cor. </i> v.) that the NT raises the expectation that these two would be martyrs. In John 21:18 there is what is virtually a description of St. Peter’s death, and in 2 Timothy 4:6 ff. St. Paul writes as one who knew that his end was near. That they both suffered in Rome is a constant tradition. Clement ( <i> loc. cit. </i> ) couples them together as ‘athletes’ who ‘struggled to the death,’ and were familiar to Roman believers. [[Ignatius]] ( <i> ad Rom. </i> iv.) implies that both had been teachers of authority in Rome. [[Eusebius]] ( <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> ii. 25) collects testimonies to the same effect. He cites [[Dionysius]] of [[Corinth]] as asserting that both apostles suffered about the same time in Rome, and adds, from the Roman Gaius, a minute description of their tombs. Tertullian ( <i> Scorp. </i> 15, <i> de Praescr. </i> 36) affirms that St. Peter was crucified, and [[Origen]] ( <i> ap. </i> Euseb. <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> iii. 1) says that he was, at his own request, placed on the cross head downwards. The ‘Domine, quo vadis?’ story is preserved in pseudo-Ambrose, <i> Sermo contra Auxentium </i> . St. Peter’s death may be dated in the early days of the Neronian persecution (a.d. 64). His [[Epistle]] implies an imminent onslaught, and the tradition which puts his grave in the [[Vatican]] suggests that he was among the victims butchered there after the great fire. Eusebius ( <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> iii. 30) repeats the story of Clem. Alex. that the Apostle before his own death saw his wife led away to execution, and comforted her in a manner typical of Christian martyrs. He ‘rejoiced because she had been called and was going home.’ Tertullian and Origen, in the passages to which allusion is made above, name Rome as the scene of St. Paul’s martyrdom, and Tertullian’s expression is to the effect that he was beheaded. [[Jerome]] ( <i> de Vir. Illustr. </i> v.) alleges that the two apostles died on the same day. This, though supported by the commemoration of both on 29th June, is in itself improbable and the tradition varies (cf. L. Duchesne, <i> Lib. Pont. </i> , 1886-92, i. 119). </p> <p> The date of the death of [[Antipas]] of [[Pergamum]] (Revelation 2:13) was, according to legend, in the reign of Domitian, when he was burnt to death in a brazen bull. But the phrase ‘in the days of Antipas’ suggests a date some years before the words were written, and Antipas was probably killed in some unknown persecution under the earlier Flavians. </p> <p> Under [[Domitian]] suffered three persons whose Christianity, if not absolutely certain, is highly probable. The Emperor’s own cousin, the consul Flavius Clemens, was condemned, according to Suetonius ( <i> Domitian </i> , 15), ‘ex tenuissima suspicione.’ If [[Clemens]] was a Christian, he would be unable to take part in public functions which involved Emperor-worship. This fits in with the assertion of [[Dio]] [[Cassius]] (lxvii. 14) that he was charged with ἀθεότης, <i> i.e. </i> ‘sacrilege,’ and with practising ‘Jewish’ ways. It also explains the scornful verdict of Suetonius that he displayed ‘contemptible indolence.’ At the same time his wife, Domitilla, was banished to Pontia (Jerome, <i> Ep. </i> 108 [or 86], ‘ad Eustochium’). With these two Dio couples M’. Acilius Glabrio as a victim of Domitian’s fury. The evidence as to his religion is inconclusive. Lightfoot’s denial of his Christianity ( <i> Apostolic Fathers </i> , I. i. 81 n.[Note: . note.]) is questioned by Ramsay ( <i> op. cit. </i> p. 261). </p> <p> With Trajan we reach the last martyr of this period. It is related in Eusebius, <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> iii. 32, that [[Symeon]] the son of Clopas, ‘the second bishop of Jerusalem,’ was arrested on the ground that he was descended from David, and was a Christian. After many days of torture he was crucified. With him, in the opinion of Eusebius, passed away the last survivor of the Apostolic Age. </p> <p> Literature.-H. B. Workman, <i> [[Persecution]] in the Early Church </i> 3, London, 1911 (with full bibliography); A. J. Mason, <i> Historic [[Martyrs]] of the Primitive Church </i> , do., 1905; B. F. Westcott, <i> The Two [[Empires]] </i> , do., 1909, ch. ii.; H. M. Gwatkin, <i> Early Church History </i> , do., 1909, vol. i. chs. v.-vii.; W. M. Ramsay, <i> The Church in the Roman Empire </i> 5, do., 1897, chs. x.-xvi.; E. G. Hardy, <i> Studies in Roman History </i> (formerly, <i> Christianity and the Roman [[Government]] </i> ), do., 1906; H. B. Swete, <i> Apocalypse of St. John 2 </i> , do., 1907, Introd., sect. vii. </p> <p> C. T. Dimont. </p>
<p> <b> 1. The name. </b> -‘Martyr’ is given as the rendering of μάρτυς in the Revised Versiononly in &nbsp;Revelation 17:6. The word is used in practically the same sense in &nbsp;Revelation 2:13 (Antipas) and &nbsp;Acts 22:20 (Stephen), but is in both passages translated ‘ <b> witness </b> .’ As Jesus is said to have ‘witnessed’ by accepting death (&nbsp;Revelation 1:5; cf. &nbsp;1 Timothy 6:13), the expression was appropriately transferred to His followers who suffered for Him. The absolute use of μαρτυρία and μαρτυρεῖν to signify this did not become fixed until the middle of the 2nd cent. (see J. B. Lightfoot on Clem. <i> ad Cor </i> . v. in <i> [[Apostolic]] [[Fathers]] </i> , I. ii. [1890] 26). </p> <p> <b> 2. The position of Christians. </b> -Our Lord warned His disciples that active hostility would be the normal attitude of the world toward the Church (&nbsp;Matthew 5:11). The Apostolic [[Age]] provided a continuous commentary on this saying. It is customary to distinguish one or two epochs in that period as moments of great persecution. But this must not obscure the truth that persecution seldom ceased altogether. In the first days of the Church this was exclusively the work of Jews. Besides the attacks mentioned in the Acts there were others to which we have only passing allusions ( <i> e.g. </i> &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 2:14, &nbsp;James 2:6; &nbsp;James 5:10, &nbsp;Hebrews 10:34). These prove that the Jews, not only of Palestine, but also of the Dispersion, were active in compelling [[Christians]] to pay for their faith by enduring legal and social oppression. The Romans did not at first discriminate between Jews and Christians, and extended to the latter the privileged toleration accorded to the former. This confusion of thought appears in the statement of Suetonius ( <i> Claud. </i> 25) that [[Jewish]] disorders were provoked by ‘Chrestus,’ and in the notion of [[Lysias]] that St. Paul was one of the [[Zealots]] (&nbsp;Acts 21:38). But under [[Nero]] the Imperial policy changed. The mere profession of [[Christianity]] now became matter for a capital charge (see this maintained in Hardy, <i> Studies in [[Roman]] History </i> , ch. iv., as against Ramsay, in <i> Church in the Roman Empire </i> 5, ch. xi. sect. 7). By both people and rulers it was held to involve ‘odium humani generis.’ It incurred popular hatred because of the divisions which it introduced into family and social life. It became a political crime through its incompatibility with Caesar-worship, its refusal to ‘worship the image of the beast’ (&nbsp;Revelation 13:15), which led the Roman authorities to regard it as anarchy. No special laws were passed against it, but there were standing police orders that it should be suppressed. This policy was steadily maintained, and such a reference as that made by Pliny in his letter to Trajan ( <i> Epp. </i> x. 97) concerning an unknown persecution in [[Bithynia]] twenty years before shows that there must have been much official activity against Christians of which no record survives. The NT reflects the consciousness of the change in the attitude of the government. In Acts Rome is the power which protects Christians against Jewish assault (&nbsp;Acts 25:10); in the [[Apocalypse]] Rome is drunk with the blood of the saints (&nbsp;Revelation 17:6). </p> <p> <b> 3. The number of the martyrs. </b> -Later ages naturally tended to exaggerate this in order to add glory to the Church. It was held that the truest following of Christ was found among those who had been put to death for His name. Legends grew up which in time invested every member of the apostolic college with the martyr’s halo (a collection of these stories may be seen in the <i> Ante-Nicene [[Christian]] [[Library]] </i> , vol. xvi. [1873]). It is instructive to note that Clem. Alex. ( <i> Strom. </i> iv. 9) quotes an early protest against supposing that salvation belonged to martyrs only, which is justified by citing the instances of some of the apostles who had died a natural death. But it remains true that the Biblical and other records leave the impression that great numbers of believers were slain in the 1st century. In the Jewish persecution [[Saul]] is said to have entered into every house (&nbsp;Acts 8:3), and to have searched every synagogue for Christians. The number of converts was already considerable in [[Jerusalem]] (cf. &nbsp;Acts 2:41; &nbsp;Acts 2:47; &nbsp;Acts 6:7), so that, unless we hold (with R. B. Rackham, <i> Acts of the [[Apostles]] </i> , 1901) that he pursued [[Hellenists]] only, the list of sufferers must have been very large. Imprisonment, beating, and even death, the Romans presumably conniving, were the penalties incurred (&nbsp;Acts 22:4-5; &nbsp;Acts 22:19). On this occasion the leaders of the Church seem to have escaped, but the next onslaught affected them specially (Acts 12). James the son of [[Zebedee]] fell, and Peter was cast into prison. These attacks left a lasting impression on the Church (cf. &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 2:14). </p> <p> Still heavier was the toll of martyrs exacted by the Roman persecutions of the 1st century. Tacitus ( <i> Ann. </i> xv. 44) speaks of a <i> multitudo ingens </i> of victims in the Neronian outbreak, and to this answers the πολὺ πλῆθος of Clem. Rom. ( <i> ad Cor. </i> vi.). In &nbsp;Revelation 13:7 testimony is borne to the thoroughness with which the whole of the Empire was made to feel the effects of this policy. The same impression is conveyed by &nbsp;1 Peter 5:8-9. The adversary’s rage is like the fury of a lion; all over the Roman world Christians are united in a community of suffering. It is noteworthy that both Jewish and [[Gentile]] persecutors seem to have found a special object of attack in the Christian prophets, who were no doubt brought into prominence by their preaching of the gospel (cf. &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 2:15, &nbsp;Revelation 16:6; &nbsp;Revelation 18:24). The horrors inflicted by the Roman torturers may be gathered from the two passages of Tacitus and [[Clement]] mentioned above. The victims were crucified, or, by a diabolical refinement of cruelty, clad in the skins of beasts to serve as the quarry of dogs. At nightfall they were smeared with pitch to stand as living torches in the gardens of Nero. For women there were brutalities more shameful than death. </p> <p> <b> 4. The historic martyrs. </b> -Among those who were done to death in the Jewish persecutions mentioned in the Acts the names of two only are preserved-Stephen, and James the son of Zebedee. [[Stephen]] was nominally charged with blasphemy, but the proceedings were no trial in any legal sense, and, if the [[Sanhedrin]] were ever called to account for them, they doubtless pleaded that a sudden and uncontrollable tumult had occurred. Of the martyrdom of James the account is in &nbsp;Acts 12:2 and in Eusebius, <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> ii. 9, quoting Clement of Alexandria. James was beheaded, and his bearing so impressed his accuser that it converted him, and he suffered with the apostle. This must have been before a.d. 44, as in that year [[Herod]] [[Agrippa]] died. Attempts have recently been made ( <i> e.g. </i> by W. Bousset, <i> Die Offenbarung Johannis </i> 5, 1896, pp. 47-8) to establish the allegation of [[Philip]] of Side that [[Papias]] had said that John the [[Apostle]] was slain with his brother. But if this were so, the silence of &nbsp;Acts 12:2 is incomprehensible. We have no reason to suppose that John died anything but a natural death. The stories of his escape from the boiling cauldron before the Latin Gate, and of his drinking poison without harm, come from [[Gnostic]] <i> Acta Johannis </i> of the 2nd century. Some years after the passion of the first James, another James, ‘the Lord’s brother,’ was murdered (? a.d. 61). Ananus, the high priest, in the interval between the death of [[Festus]] and the arrival of Albinus, caused him to be stoned. The dramatic account of his end given by [[Hegesippus]] is preserved in Eusebius, <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> ii. 23. A shorter and more authentic record may be found in Josephus, <i> Ant. </i> XX. ix. 1 (see J. B. Mayor, <i> Ep. of St. James </i> 3, 1910, p. xxxix). </p> <p> In Rome the first shadow of the Neronian persecution fell upon Pomponia Graecina. The evidence of the [[Catacombs]] has made it almost certain that the ‘foreign superstition’ with which she was charged (Tac. <i> Ann. </i> xiii. 32) was Christianity (cf. Lightfoot, <i> Apostolic Fathers </i> , I. i. 30). Her trial resulted in her acquittal (a.d. 57). Seven years later Rome was burnt, and Nero turned the popular rage against the Christians. His success cost the Church on earth the lives not only of a great host of unknown saints but also of St. Peter and St. Paul. Lightfoot points out (on Clem. Rom. <i> ad Cor. </i> v.) that the NT raises the expectation that these two would be martyrs. In &nbsp;John 21:18 there is what is virtually a description of St. Peter’s death, and in &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:6 ff. St. Paul writes as one who knew that his end was near. That they both suffered in Rome is a constant tradition. Clement ( <i> loc. cit. </i> ) couples them together as ‘athletes’ who ‘struggled to the death,’ and were familiar to Roman believers. [[Ignatius]] ( <i> ad Rom. </i> iv.) implies that both had been teachers of authority in Rome. [[Eusebius]] ( <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> ii. 25) collects testimonies to the same effect. He cites [[Dionysius]] of [[Corinth]] as asserting that both apostles suffered about the same time in Rome, and adds, from the Roman Gaius, a minute description of their tombs. Tertullian ( <i> Scorp. </i> 15, <i> de Praescr. </i> 36) affirms that St. Peter was crucified, and [[Origen]] ( <i> ap. </i> Euseb. <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> iii. 1) says that he was, at his own request, placed on the cross head downwards. The ‘Domine, quo vadis?’ story is preserved in pseudo-Ambrose, <i> Sermo contra Auxentium </i> . St. Peter’s death may be dated in the early days of the Neronian persecution (a.d. 64). His [[Epistle]] implies an imminent onslaught, and the tradition which puts his grave in the [[Vatican]] suggests that he was among the victims butchered there after the great fire. Eusebius ( <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> iii. 30) repeats the story of Clem. Alex. that the Apostle before his own death saw his wife led away to execution, and comforted her in a manner typical of Christian martyrs. He ‘rejoiced because she had been called and was going home.’ Tertullian and Origen, in the passages to which allusion is made above, name Rome as the scene of St. Paul’s martyrdom, and Tertullian’s expression is to the effect that he was beheaded. [[Jerome]] ( <i> de Vir. Illustr. </i> v.) alleges that the two apostles died on the same day. This, though supported by the commemoration of both on 29th June, is in itself improbable and the tradition varies (cf. L. Duchesne, <i> Lib. Pont. </i> , 1886-92, i. 119). </p> <p> The date of the death of [[Antipas]] of [[Pergamum]] (&nbsp;Revelation 2:13) was, according to legend, in the reign of Domitian, when he was burnt to death in a brazen bull. But the phrase ‘in the days of Antipas’ suggests a date some years before the words were written, and Antipas was probably killed in some unknown persecution under the earlier Flavians. </p> <p> Under [[Domitian]] suffered three persons whose Christianity, if not absolutely certain, is highly probable. The Emperor’s own cousin, the consul Flavius Clemens, was condemned, according to Suetonius ( <i> Domitian </i> , 15), ‘ex tenuissima suspicione.’ If [[Clemens]] was a Christian, he would be unable to take part in public functions which involved Emperor-worship. This fits in with the assertion of [[Dio]] [[Cassius]] (lxvii. 14) that he was charged with ἀθεότης, <i> i.e. </i> ‘sacrilege,’ and with practising ‘Jewish’ ways. It also explains the scornful verdict of Suetonius that he displayed ‘contemptible indolence.’ At the same time his wife, Domitilla, was banished to Pontia (Jerome, <i> Ep. </i> 108 [or 86], ‘ad Eustochium’). With these two Dio couples M’. Acilius Glabrio as a victim of Domitian’s fury. The evidence as to his religion is inconclusive. Lightfoot’s denial of his Christianity ( <i> Apostolic Fathers </i> , I. i. 81 n.[Note: . note.]) is questioned by Ramsay ( <i> op. cit. </i> p. 261). </p> <p> With Trajan we reach the last martyr of this period. It is related in Eusebius, <i> Historia Ecclesiastica (Eusebius, etc.) </i> iii. 32, that [[Symeon]] the son of Clopas, ‘the second bishop of Jerusalem,’ was arrested on the ground that he was descended from David, and was a Christian. After many days of torture he was crucified. With him, in the opinion of Eusebius, passed away the last survivor of the Apostolic Age. </p> <p> Literature.-H. B. Workman, <i> [[Persecution]] in the Early Church </i> 3, London, 1911 (with full bibliography); A. J. Mason, <i> Historic [[Martyrs]] of the Primitive Church </i> , do., 1905; B. F. Westcott, <i> The Two [[Empires]] </i> , do., 1909, ch. ii.; H. M. Gwatkin, <i> Early Church History </i> , do., 1909, vol. i. chs. v.-vii.; W. M. Ramsay, <i> The Church in the Roman Empire </i> 5, do., 1897, chs. x.-xvi.; E. G. Hardy, <i> Studies in Roman History </i> (formerly, <i> Christianity and the Roman [[Government]] </i> ), do., 1906; H. B. Swete, <i> Apocalypse of St. John 2 </i> , do., 1907, Introd., sect. vii. </p> <p> C. T. Dimont. </p>
          
          
== Charles Buck Theological Dictionary <ref name="term_20139" /> ==
== Charles Buck Theological Dictionary <ref name="term_20139" /> ==
Line 6: Line 6:
          
          
== Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_67585" /> ==
== Morrish Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_67585" /> ==
<p> The Greek word is μάρτυς, and is very frequently translated 'witness;' a martyr is one who meets with death because of the witness he bears. Stephen was a martyr, Acts 22:20; also Antipas, Revelation 2:13 . The 'two witnesses ' in Revelation 11 will also be martyrs, and [[Babylon]] the Great is charged with being drunken "with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus." Revelation 17:6 . The history of the church records the faithfulness of many of these. There can be no doubt that many of the O.T. saints also died as martyrs. [[Jezebel]] cut off the prophets of Jehovah. 1 Kings 18:13 . The Lord charged the [[Pharisees]] with being the children of them which killed the prophets, Matthew 23:31; and in the "cloud of witnesses" spoken of in Hebrews 11 , were some of whom it is said "others were tortured [ <i> lit. </i> broken on the wheel], <i> not accepting deliverance, </i> " as many martyrs since then might have saved their lives by denying their faith. Christ Himself was the faithful and true witness, Revelation 1:5; Revelation 3:14; and He said to His persecutors, "Ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you . . . . ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth." John 8:37,40 . Thus the Lord Jesus was the true Martyr, though His death comprehended much more than dying as a martyr, namely, atonement. </p>
<p> The Greek word is μάρτυς, and is very frequently translated 'witness;' a martyr is one who meets with death because of the witness he bears. Stephen was a martyr, &nbsp;Acts 22:20; also Antipas, &nbsp;Revelation 2:13 . The 'two witnesses ' in &nbsp;Revelation 11 will also be martyrs, and [[Babylon]] the Great is charged with being drunken "with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus." &nbsp; Revelation 17:6 . The history of the church records the faithfulness of many of these. There can be no doubt that many of the O.T. saints also died as martyrs. [[Jezebel]] cut off the prophets of Jehovah. &nbsp;1 Kings 18:13 . The Lord charged the [[Pharisees]] with being the children of them which killed the prophets, &nbsp;Matthew 23:31; and in the "cloud of witnesses" spoken of in &nbsp;Hebrews 11 , were some of whom it is said "others were tortured [ <i> lit. </i> broken on the wheel], <i> not accepting deliverance, </i> " as many martyrs since then might have saved their lives by denying their faith. Christ Himself was the faithful and true witness, &nbsp;Revelation 1:5; &nbsp;Revelation 3:14; and He said to His persecutors, "Ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you . . . . ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth." &nbsp;John 8:37,40 . Thus the Lord Jesus was the true Martyr, though His death comprehended much more than dying as a martyr, namely, atonement. </p>
          
          
== American Tract Society Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_16665" /> ==
== American Tract Society Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_16665" /> ==
<p> A witness, Matthew 18:16 Luke 24:48; in ecclesiastical history, "a witness, by the shedding of his blood, in testifying to the truth." Thus martyrs are distinguished from "confessors," properly so called, who underwent great afflictions for their confession of the truth, but without suffering death. The term "martyr" occurs only thrice in the New Testament, Acts 22:20 Revelation 2:13 17:6 . Since the time of Stephen, Acts 7:59 22:20 , myriads of martyrs have sealed the truth of Christianity by a painful death; which they willingly endured through faith, rather than to deny Christ, and which they often eagerly desired as a special privilege. It is doubtless possible to be put to death as a Christian, without real love for Christ, 1 Corinthians 13:3; but in general "the noble army of the martyrs" have borne a true and overwhelming testimony to the power and preciousness of faith in Christ; and their blood witnesses before God against their foes, especially against that apostate church which is "drunken with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus," Revelation 17:6 . </p>
<p> A witness, &nbsp;Matthew 18:16 &nbsp; Luke 24:48; in ecclesiastical history, "a witness, by the shedding of his blood, in testifying to the truth." Thus martyrs are distinguished from "confessors," properly so called, who underwent great afflictions for their confession of the truth, but without suffering death. The term "martyr" occurs only thrice in the New Testament, &nbsp;Acts 22:20 &nbsp; Revelation 2:13 &nbsp; 17:6 . Since the time of Stephen, &nbsp;Acts 7:59 &nbsp; 22:20 , myriads of martyrs have sealed the truth of Christianity by a painful death; which they willingly endured through faith, rather than to deny Christ, and which they often eagerly desired as a special privilege. It is doubtless possible to be put to death as a Christian, without real love for Christ, &nbsp;1 Corinthians 13:3; but in general "the noble army of the martyrs" have borne a true and overwhelming testimony to the power and preciousness of faith in Christ; and their blood witnesses before God against their foes, especially against that apostate church which is "drunken with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus," &nbsp;Revelation 17:6 . </p>
          
          
== Bridgeway Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_18839" /> ==
== Bridgeway Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_18839" /> ==
<p> Martyrs are those who stand firm in the midst of persecution and willingly suffers death rather than deny their faith (Acts 7:54-60; Acts 12:1-2; Acts 22:20; Revelation 2:13). The word ‘martyr’ comes from the Greek word that is used in the New [[Testament]] for ‘witness’ and ‘testimony’. People became known as martyrs when they died because of their witness, or testimony, to their Lord (Revelation 6:9-11; Revelation 12:11; Revelation 17:6; Revelation 20:4). </p> <p> In the end the victors will be the martyrs, not their opponents. The basis of this assured victory is the death and resurrection of Christ, who is himself the faithful and true witness (2 Timothy 4:6-8; 2 Timothy 4:18Revelation 12:10-11 </p>
<p> Martyrs are those who stand firm in the midst of persecution and willingly suffers death rather than deny their faith (&nbsp;Acts 7:54-60; &nbsp;Acts 12:1-2; &nbsp;Acts 22:20; &nbsp;Revelation 2:13). The word ‘martyr’ comes from the Greek word that is used in the New [[Testament]] for ‘witness’ and ‘testimony’. People became known as martyrs when they died because of their witness, or testimony, to their Lord (&nbsp;Revelation 6:9-11; &nbsp;Revelation 12:11; &nbsp;Revelation 17:6; &nbsp;Revelation 20:4). </p> <p> In the end the victors will be the martyrs, not their opponents. The basis of this assured victory is the death and resurrection of Christ, who is himself the faithful and true witness (&nbsp;2 Timothy 4:6-8; &nbsp;2 Timothy 4:18&nbsp;Revelation 12:10-11 </p>
          
          
== Easton's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_32505" /> ==
== Easton's Bible Dictionary <ref name="term_32505" /> ==
<li> As of one bearing testimony to the truth of what he has seen or known (Luke 24:48; Acts 1:8,22; Romans 1:9; 1 Thessalonians 2:5,10; 1 John 1:2 ). <div> <p> Copyright StatementThese dictionary topics are from M.G. Easton M.A., D.D., Illustrated [[Bible]] Dictionary, Third Edition, published by [[Thomas]] Nelson, 1897. Public Domain. </p> <p> Bibliography InformationEaston, Matthew George. Entry for 'Martyr'. Easton's Bible Dictionary. https://www.studylight.org/dictionaries/eng/ebd/m/martyr.html. 1897. </p> </div> </li>
<li> As of one bearing testimony to the truth of what he has seen or known (&nbsp;Luke 24:48; &nbsp;Acts 1:8,22; &nbsp;Romans 1:9; &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 2:5,10; &nbsp;1 John 1:2 ). <div> <p> '''Copyright Statement''' These dictionary topics are from M.G. Easton M.A., D.D., Illustrated [[Bible]] Dictionary, Third Edition, published by [[Thomas]] Nelson, 1897. Public Domain. </p> <p> '''Bibliography Information''' Easton, Matthew George. Entry for 'Martyr'. Easton's Bible Dictionary. https://www.studylight.org/dictionaries/eng/ebd/m/martyr.html. 1897. </p> </div> </li>
          
          
== Webster's Dictionary <ref name="term_141912" /> ==
== Webster's Dictionary <ref name="term_141912" /> ==
<p> (1): (n.) One who, by his death, bears witness to the truth of the gospel; one who is put to death for his religion; as, Stephen was the first Christian martyr. </p> <p> (2): (v. t.) To persecute; to torment; to torture. </p> <p> (3): (n.) Hence, one who sacrifices his life, his station, or what is of great value to him, for the sake of principle, or to sustain a cause. </p> <p> (4): (v. t.) To put to death for adhering to some belief, esp. Christianity; to sacrifice on account of faith or profession. </p>
<p> '''(1):''' ''' (''' n.) One who, by his death, bears witness to the truth of the gospel; one who is put to death for his religion; as, Stephen was the first Christian martyr. </p> <p> '''(2):''' ''' (''' v. t.) To persecute; to torment; to torture. </p> <p> '''(3):''' ''' (''' n.) Hence, one who sacrifices his life, his station, or what is of great value to him, for the sake of principle, or to sustain a cause. </p> <p> '''(4):''' ''' (''' v. t.) To put to death for adhering to some belief, esp. Christianity; to sacrifice on account of faith or profession. </p>
          
          
== King James Dictionary <ref name="term_61577" /> ==
== King James Dictionary <ref name="term_61577" /> ==
Line 27: Line 27:
          
          
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_49891" /> ==
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_49891" /> ==
<p> (μάρτυς and μάρτυρ , so rendered only in Acts 22:20; Revelation 2:13; Revelation 18:6) is properly a witness, and is applied in the New Testament </p> <p> (a) to judicial witnesses (Matthew 18:16; Matthew 26:65; Mark 14:63; Acts 6:13; Acts 7:58; 2 Corinthians 13:1; 1 Timothy 5:19; Hebrews 10:28. The [[Septuagint]] also uses it for the [[Hebrew]] עֵד , ed, in Deuteronomy 17:16; Proverbs 24:28); </p> <p> (b) To one who has testified, or can testify to the truth of what he has seen, heard, or known. This is a frequent sense in the New Testament, as in Luke 24:48; Acts 1:8; Acts 1:22; Romans 1:9; 2 Corinthians 1:23; 1 Thessalonians 2:5; 1 Thessalonians 2:10; 1 Timothy 6:12; 2 Timothy 2:2; 1 Peter 5:1; Revelation 1:5; Revelation 3:14; Revelation 11:3, and elsewhere. </p> <p> (c) The meaning of the word which has now become the most usual. is that in which it occurs most rarely in the Scriptures, i.e. one who by his death bears witness to the truth. In this sense we only find it in Acts 22:20; Revelation 2:13; Revelation 17:6. This now exclusive sense of the word was brought into general use by the early ecclesiastical writers, who applied it to every one who suffered death in the Christian cause (see Suicer, Thesaurus Eccles. sub. roc.). (See [[Martyrs]]). </p> <p> Stephen was in this sense the first martyr, (See [[Stephen]]), and the spiritual honors of his death tended in no small degree to raise to the most extravagant estimation, in the early Church, the value of the testimony of blood. Eventually a martyr's death was supposed, on the alleged authority of the under-named texts, to cancel all the sins of the past life (Luke 12:50; Mark 10:39); to supply the place of baptism (Matthew 10:39), and at once to secure admittance to the presence of the Lord in [[Paradise]] (Matthew 5:10-12). In imitation of the family custom of annually commemorating at the grave the death of deceased members, the churches celebrated the deaths of their martyrs by prayers at their graves, and by love-feasts. From this high estimation of the martyrs, Christians were sometimes led to deliver themselves up voluntarily to the public authorities — thus justifying the charge of fanaticism brought against them by the heahen. the. For the most part, however, this practice was discountenanced, the words of Christ himself being brought against it (Matthew 10:23; see Gieseler, Eccles. Hist. 1:109, 110). For monographs, see Volbeding, Index Programmatum, p. 75, 116. (See [[Confessor]]). </p>
<p> (μάρτυς and μάρτυρ , so rendered only in &nbsp;Acts 22:20; &nbsp;Revelation 2:13; &nbsp;Revelation 18:6) is properly a witness, and is applied in the New Testament </p> <p> '''(a)''' to judicial witnesses (&nbsp;Matthew 18:16; &nbsp;Matthew 26:65; &nbsp;Mark 14:63; &nbsp;Acts 6:13; &nbsp;Acts 7:58; &nbsp;2 Corinthians 13:1; &nbsp;1 Timothy 5:19; &nbsp;Hebrews 10:28. The [[Septuagint]] also uses it for the [[Hebrew]] עֵד ''',''' ed, in &nbsp;Deuteronomy 17:16; &nbsp;Proverbs 24:28); </p> <p> '''(b)''' To one who has testified, or can testify to the truth of what he has seen, heard, or known. This is a frequent sense in the New Testament, as in &nbsp;Luke 24:48; &nbsp;Acts 1:8; &nbsp;Acts 1:22; &nbsp;Romans 1:9; &nbsp;2 Corinthians 1:23; &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 2:5; &nbsp;1 Thessalonians 2:10; &nbsp;1 Timothy 6:12; &nbsp;2 Timothy 2:2; &nbsp;1 Peter 5:1; &nbsp;Revelation 1:5; &nbsp;Revelation 3:14; &nbsp;Revelation 11:3, and elsewhere. </p> <p> '''(c)''' The meaning of the word which has now become the most usual. is that in which it occurs most rarely in the Scriptures, i.e. one who by his death bears witness to the truth. In this sense we only find it in &nbsp;Acts 22:20; &nbsp;Revelation 2:13; &nbsp;Revelation 17:6. This now exclusive sense of the word was brought into general use by the early ecclesiastical writers, who applied it to every one who suffered death in the Christian cause (see Suicer, Thesaurus Eccles. sub. roc.). (See [[Martyrs]]). </p> <p> Stephen was in this sense the first martyr, (See [[Stephen]]), and the spiritual honors of his death tended in no small degree to raise to the most extravagant estimation, in the early Church, the value of the testimony of blood. Eventually a martyr's death was supposed, on the alleged authority of the under-named texts, to cancel all the sins of the past life (&nbsp;Luke 12:50; &nbsp;Mark 10:39); to supply the place of baptism (&nbsp;Matthew 10:39), and at once to secure admittance to the presence of the Lord in [[Paradise]] (&nbsp;Matthew 5:10-12). In imitation of the family custom of annually commemorating at the grave the death of deceased members, the churches celebrated the deaths of their martyrs by prayers at their graves, and by love-feasts. From this high estimation of the martyrs, Christians were sometimes led to deliver themselves up voluntarily to the public authorities — thus justifying the charge of fanaticism brought against them by the heahen. the. For the most part, however, this practice was discountenanced, the words of Christ himself being brought against it (&nbsp;Matthew 10:23; see Gieseler, Eccles. Hist. 1:109, 110). For monographs, see Volbeding, Index Programmatum, p. 75, 116. (See [[Confessor]]). </p>
          
          
== Kitto's Popular Cyclopedia of Biblial Literature <ref name="term_16210" /> ==
== Kitto's Popular Cyclopedia of Biblial Literature <ref name="term_16210" /> ==
Line 33: Line 33:
          
          
== International Standard Bible Encyclopedia <ref name="term_6168" /> ==
== International Standard Bible Encyclopedia <ref name="term_6168" /> ==
<p> ''''' mar´tẽr ''''' ( μαρτύς , <i> ''''' martús ''''' </i> , Aeolic μαρτύρ , <i> ''''' martúr ''''' </i> ): One who gives heed, and so, a "witness," so translated in numerous passages, both as of one bearing testimony, and also as of one who is a spectator of anything (see [[Witness]] ). In the King James Version rendered "martyr" in Acts 22:20 , "thy martyr Stephen"; and Revelation 2:13 , "Antipas my faithful martyr"; also Revelation 17:6 , "the blood of the martyrs of Jesus," where alone the American Standard Revised Version retains "martyrs." These 3 passages are the beginning of the use of the word "martyr" for such witnesses as were faithful even unto death, its uniform modern use. </p>
<p> ''''' mar´tẽr ''''' ( μαρτύς , <i> ''''' martús ''''' </i> , Aeolic μαρτύρ , <i> ''''' martúr ''''' </i> ): One who gives heed, and so, a "witness," so translated in numerous passages, both as of one bearing testimony, and also as of one who is a spectator of anything (see [[Witness]] ). In the King James Version rendered "martyr" in &nbsp;Acts 22:20 , "thy martyr Stephen"; and &nbsp;Revelation 2:13 , "Antipas my faithful martyr"; also &nbsp;Revelation 17:6 , "the blood of the martyrs of Jesus," where alone the American Standard Revised Version retains "martyrs." These 3 passages are the beginning of the use of the word "martyr" for such witnesses as were faithful even unto death, its uniform modern use. </p>
          
          
==References ==
==References ==