Difference between revisions of "Prayer Of Joseph"

<p> An Old [[Testament]] pseudepigraph, number 3 in the <i> [[Stichometry]] </i> of Nicephorus (Westcott, <i> [[Canon]] of the New Testament7 </i> , 571), with the length given as 1,100 lines, and number 5 in the <i> List of Sixty Books </i> (Westcott, 568). The work is lost, and the only quotations are in [[Origen]] ( <i> In [[Joan]] </i> ., ii. 25, English in <i> Ante-Nicene [[Fathers]] </i> , IX, 341; <i> In </i> <i> Gen </i> ., iii. 9,12). Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are said to have been created before every work, but Jacob-Israel is the greatest, "the firstborn of every living creature," the "first minister in God's presence," greater than the angel with whom he wrestled. The purport may be anti-Christian, the patriarchs exalted in place of Christ; compare, perhaps, [[Enoch]] 71 (but not so in Charles' 1912 text), but Origen's favorable opinion of the book proves that the polemic could not have been very direct. </p> Literature. <p> <i> Gjv </i> , 4th edition, III, 359-60; [[Dillmann]] in <i> Pre </i> , 2nd edition, Xii , 362; compare Beer in 3edition, Xvi , 256; Fabricius, <i> Codex pseudep </i> . Vet. Test., I, 761-71. </p>

<p> An Old [[Testament]] pseudepigraph, number 3 in the <i> [[Stichometry]] </i> of Nicephorus (Westcott, <i> [[Canon]] of the New Testament7 </i> , 571), with the length given as 1,100 lines, and number 5 in the <i> List of Sixty Books </i> (Westcott, 568). The work is lost, and the only quotations are in [[Origen]] ( <i> In [[Joan]] </i> ., ii. 25, English in <i> Ante-Nicene [[Fathers]] </i> , IX, 341; <i> In </i> <i> Gen </i> ., iii. 9,12). Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are said to have been created before every work, but Jacob-Israel is the greatest, "the firstborn of every living creature," the "first minister in God's presence," greater than the angel with whom he wrestled. The purport may be anti-Christian, the patriarchs exalted in place of Christ; compare, perhaps, [[Enoch]] 71 (but not so in Charles' 1912 text), but Origen's favorable opinion of the book proves that the polemic could not have been very direct. </p> Literature. <p> <i> Gjv </i> , 4th edition, III, 359-60; [[Dillmann]] in <i> Pre </i> , 2nd edition, Xii , 362; compare Beer in 3edition, Xvi , 256; Fabricius, <i> Codex pseudep </i> . Vet. Test., I, 761-71. </p>

<ref name="term_5445"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/international-standard-bible-encyclopedia/joseph,+prayer+of Prayer Of Joseph from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia]</ref>

<ref name="term_5445"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/international-standard-bible-encyclopedia/joseph,+prayer+of Prayer Of Joseph from International Standard Bible Encyclopedia]</ref>

</references>

</references>