From BiblePortal Wikipedia
Revision as of 07:50, 15 October 2021 by BiblePortalWiki (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Webster's Dictionary [1]

(1): ( n.) An act or state of perception by the sense above described; an act of apprehending any object whatever; an act or state of apprehending the state of the soul itself; consciousness.

(2): ( n.) The sense by which the mind, through certain nerves of the body, perceives external objects, or certain states of the body itself; that one of the five senses which resides in the general nerves of sensation distributed over the body, especially in its surface; the sense of touch; nervous sensibility to external objects.

(3): ( a.) Expressive of great sensibility; attended by, or evincing, sensibility; as, he made a feeling representation of his wrongs.

(4): ( a.) Possessing great sensibility; easily affected or moved; as, a feeling heart.

(5): ( n.) The capacity of the soul for emotional states; a high degree of susceptibility to emotions or states of the sensibility not dependent on the body; as, a man of feeling; a man destitute of feeling.

(6): ( n.) Any state or condition of emotion; the exercise of the capacity for emotion; any mental state whatever; as, a right or a wrong feeling in the heart; our angry or kindly feelings; a feeling of pride or of humility.

(7): ( p. pr. & vb. n.) of Feel

(8): ( n.) That quality of a work of art which embodies the mental emotion of the artist, and is calculated to affect similarly the spectator.

King James Dictionary [2]

FEE'LING, ppr.

1. Perceiving by the touch having perception. 2. a. Expressive of great sensibility affecting tending to excite the passions. He made a feeling representation of his wrongs. He spoke with feeling eloquence. 3. Possessing great sensibility easily affected or moved as a feeling man a feeling heart. 4. Sensibly or deeply affected as, I had a feeling sense of his favors. This use is not analogical, but common.


1. The sense of touch the sense by which we perceive external objects which come in contact with the body, and obtain ideas of their tangible qualities one of the five senses. It is by feeling we know that a body is hard or soft, hot or cold, wet or dry, rough or smooth. 2. Sensation the effect of perception.

The apprehension of the good gives but the greater feeling to the worse.

3. Faculty or power of perception sensibility.

Their king, out of a princely feeling, was sparing and compassionate towards his subjects.

4. Nice sensibility as a man of feeling. 5. Excitement emotion.

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [3]

The relation of feeling to religion is a subject of importance both from a religious and philosophical point of view. It has been viewed is very different ways, and has led to long and animated controversies.

In Greek, the word Αἴσθησις denoted every kind of perception, sensuous and spiritual, mediate and immediate; consequently, also what we call feeling. Plato referred to a sensuous spiritual feeling, though he did not call it by this names; for, according to his-a, the understanding ( Νοῦς ) communes with the affections ( Ἐπιθυμητικὁν ), and the seat of this communion is the liver, from which proceed the power of divination ( Μαντεία ) and enthusiasm ( Ἐνθουσιασμός ). Connected with this view is the opinion of Plato, that virtue cannot be taught, and that what is substantially good breaks forth in the soul as an immediate light.

The extensive -usage of the Latin word sensus embraces also the natural moral feeling, senses comnunis, senses hominum.

In the Septuagint the word Αἴσθησις frequently occurs, and is generally rendered by "knowledge" or "wisdom," as  Proverbs 1:7;  Proverbs 12:23. In the New Testament it occurs only once,  Philippians 1:9, where it is coupled with Ἐπίγνωσις (English version: and this I pray that your love may abound yet more and score in knowledge and in all judgment). The psychological meaning of the words Αἴσθησις and Sensus in the Greek and Latin fathers is not fully settled, but in general they use them to denote a knowledge, or insight obtained by means of feeling. Origen (Contra Celsum, i, 48) speaks of a "divine insight" ( Θεία Αἴσθησις ) of the soul by means of which enlightened men perceive supernatural things just as others perceive natural objects by means of their senses. Clement (Stromat. iv, p. 333, ed. Potter) ascribes to the scientific man a Συναίσθησις , a faculty of inventing and understanding, analogous to the faculty of taste possessed by the sculptor, and the sense of hearing possessed by the musician. To denote a feeling accompanying the will, the Latin fathers used the word Mcivsace. Among the Latin fathers, Tertullian ( De Anima, chap. ii) spoke of a Publicus Sensus which leads the soul to a knowledge of God. Augustin introduced the expression Inner Sense (Interior Sensus), which become of great importance in the writings of the mystics. The common expressions in the mystics to denote subjective and objective feeling are Sensus, Sentimentum Affectus, Gustus. Affectus always embraces a practical impulse. Gustus, which is identified with Senses, does not exclude the practical impulse, but properly denotes feeling viewed in its relation to its own contents, and therefore designated as a Modes Cognoscendi, a kind of cognition. The immediateness of this Sensus, which words cannot fully express, is therefore, in the opinion of the mystics, greatly superior to an intellectual insight. Mystic theology, according to Gerson, because it rests on feeling, is widely different from all other sciences. Thomas Aquinas regards not only mystical theology, but theology and faith in general, as founded in the Pia Affectio (pious or religious feeling), because faith supposes a movement of the will towards the first. truth and the highest good which produces assent (Summa Theol. ii, 2, 9, 4, 5).

The mystical writers of Germany is the Middle Ages, writing on practical more than speculative subjects, spoke of feeling in particulars as a subjective consciousness, and demanded its renunciation. The spiritual man, they urged, should emancipate himself from all emotions and sever his connection with everything created, that God might become present to him, and eternity might be felt by him and tasted. The objective feeling of the supernatural God appears to these writers as the final result of the renunciation of the subjective feeling of personal and individual existence.

Luther warned against a reliance upon "feeling" instead of clinging to the " word." At the same time, however, he demands that the soul feel the call of the Lord, and the "spirit of adoption, whereby we cry Abba, father" ( Romans 8:15), he defines as a feeling of the fatherly love of God. The testimony of the Holy Ghost he finds in the religious experience, and this experience he identifies with the religious feeling. Similar are the views of the other reformers and the early writers of the Reformed churches.

A greater stress was laid on feeling as an element of religion by the Pietists, who regarded its very inexpressibility as an argument for its truth. The same was done by the Moravians, who reduced religion to the feeling of truth. Opposition to the Pietists made most of the later dogmatic writers of the Lutheran Church suspicious of feeling as an element of religion; but some recognised its importance, as M. Pfaff (Instit. Theol. and Moral.), who did not hesitate to apply (like the society of Friends) to the "spiritual feeling" (sensus or gustus spiritualas) the expression " spiritual light" (lumen spirituale).

About the middle of the 18th century arose the system of Utilitarianism. Bread and butter were now more valuable than metaphysics. In the same proportion as confidence in the truth of thought vanished, confidence in - the objective contents of feeling was also weakened. But gradually philosophy prepared the way for a more correct appreciation of feeling. Until Wolf, philosophy had only recognised two faculties of the soul, intellect and will (or desire). Tetens added feeling as " the inner sense for the pleasant and the unpleasant." Kant, also, in his Kritik der Urtheilskrsaft, reduced all faculties of the soul to three, one of which was the Gefuhl der Lust und Unlust (feeling of the pleasant and unpleasant). Kant also called attention to the fact that in aesthetics the beautiful and sublime is felt, and the infinite is seen in the finite appearance. Here, therefore, an objective feeling was found. This idea of Kant's aesthetics was further developed by Fries, who based upon feeling an aesthetico- religious system which taught that the highest ideas must be divined by faith. Jacobi taught an immediate faculty of the divine, which he first called the faculty of faith; later, of reason; finally-adopting the terms of Fries - of feeling.

These philosophical speculations greatly influenced the various systems of Rationalism. After the times of Wolf, only a few, as Rohr, adhered to an exclusive intellectualism. Most of the important representatives of Rationalism accept the theories of Fries and Jacobi. Thus Wegscheider refers chiefly to the philosophical works of-the disciples of Jacobi-Gerlach, Bouterweck, and Salat. And Gabler, one of the keenest of the early Rationalists, defines religion as a ' feeling of dependence upon the infinite."

Among the adherents of Supranaturalism, Bretschneider and Reinhard recognised only a subjective feeling, but De Wette introduced the theory of Fries into systematic theology. Unlike Fries, however, in whose system there still was some obscurity as regards the relation of feeling and will to religion, De Wette based religion altogether on feeling or an esthetic view of the world, in which all difference between religion and art disappeared.

The system of Jacobi and of Spinoza, together with the spirit prevailing among the Moravians, worked together to produce the new doctrine of feeling which constituted the basis of the theology of Schleiermacher, and which still influences most theological systems of modern times. For Schleiermacher, religion is "'the feeling of absolute dependence;" that to which our reflection traces our individual existence is called God; and thus, in feeling, God is given to us in an original manner. (See Schleiermacher). This theory of feeling was defended and keenly developed by Twesten, and in particular by Nitzsch. Hegel severely attacked the views of Schleiermacher, but his own views considerably changed with the gradual development of his system. See Tholuck, in Herzog's Real-Encyklopadie, 4:703.

International Standard Bible Encyclopedia [4]

fēl´ing  : The following varieties of meaning are to be noted:

(1) "To touch," "handle," "grope after" (משׁשׁ , māshash ( Genesis 27:12 ,  Genesis 27:22;  Exodus 10:21; מוּשׁ , mūsh ,  Genesis 27:21;  Judges 16:26; ψηλαφάω , psēlapháō ,  Acts 17:27 ).

(2) "To know," "understand," "experience" (בּין , bı̄n ,  Psalm 58:9; ידע , yādha‛ ,  Proverbs 23:35; γινώσκω , ginō̇skō ,  Mark 5:29 ).

(3) "To have a fellow feeling," "to place one's self into the position of another," especially while suffering, "to have compassion" (συμπαθεῖν , sumpatheı́n ,  Hebrews 4:15; compare  Hebrews 10:34; which is to be carefully distinguished from the similar verb συμπάσχειν , sumpáschein , which means "to share in the same suffering with another,"  Romans 8:17;  1 Corinthians 12:26 ). See Delitzsch, Commentary on   Hebrews 4:15 .

(4) "To feel harm," "pain," "grief," "to be sensitive" (πάσχειν , páschein , with the roots path - and penth -,  Acts 28:5 ); or with the negation: "to have ceased to feel," "to be apathetic," "past feeling," "callous," ἀπηλγηκώς , apēlgēkō̇s , perfect participle of ἀπαλγέω , apalgéō ( Ephesians 4:19 ) which describes the condition of the sinner, who by hardening his heart against moral influences is left without a sense of his high vocation, without an idea of the awfulness of sin, without reverence to God, without an appreciation of the salvation offered by Him, and without fear of His judgment.