Difference between revisions of "Habiru"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
(Created page with "Habiru <ref name="term_40542" /> <p> Identity of the Habiru Scholars have offered several theories attempting to identify these Habiru. Because the word sounds much l...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Habiru <ref name="term_40542" />  
 
<p> [[Identity]] of the [[Habiru]] Scholars have offered several theories attempting to identify these Habiru. Because the word sounds much like the name “Hebrew,” some scholars thought it referred to ethnic Israel. [[Since]] it appears in texts written earlier than [[Abraham]] lived and since the Habiru seemed numerous during the patriarchal period, it does not appear to designate ethnic Hebrews. Most scholars treat the term as the name of a social class: outcasts or renegades. In letters written from [[Palestine]] to Amarna in Egypt, they appear as rebels attacking cities belonging to the pharaohs of the fourteenth century, and in one text they are further identified as former slaves who had revolted. </p> <p> [[Relation]] to Hebrews If the Habiru are rebels and not an ethnic group, are they nevertheless somehow related to the Hebrews? Some scholars have said yes, seeing the Habiru as nomads who might have included the patriarchs to Joshua, or as peasants who revolted. The Bible, however, depicts the patriarchs, not as nomads, but as pastoralists (shepherds who settled beside other shepherds and farmers). [[Neither]] was Joshua a nomad, nor do the books of Joshua and Judges depict a revolt by peasants. About the only possible relationship is that the Hebrews might have included some Habiru from [[Egypt]] or Canaan. </p> <p> Paul Redditt </p> <p> </p>
Habiru <ref name="term_40542" />
==References ==
<p> Identity of the [[Habiru]] Scholars have offered several theories attempting to identify these Habiru. Because the word sounds much like the name “Hebrew,” some scholars thought it referred to ethnic Israel. Since it appears in texts written earlier than [[Abraham]] lived and since the Habiru seemed numerous during the patriarchal period, it does not appear to designate ethnic Hebrews. Most scholars treat the term as the name of a social class: outcasts or renegades. In letters written from [[Palestine]] to Amarna in Egypt, they appear as rebels attacking cities belonging to the pharaohs of the fourteenth century, and in one text they are further identified as former slaves who had revolted. </p> <p> Relation to Hebrews If the Habiru are rebels and not an ethnic group, are they nevertheless somehow related to the Hebrews? Some scholars have said yes, seeing the Habiru as nomads who might have included the patriarchs to Joshua, or as peasants who revolted. The Bible, however, depicts the patriarchs, not as nomads, but as pastoralists (shepherds who settled beside other shepherds and farmers). Neither was Joshua a nomad, nor do the books of Joshua and Judges depict a revolt by peasants. About the only possible relationship is that the Hebrews might have included some Habiru from Egypt or Canaan. </p> <p> Paul Redditt </p>
 
== References ==
<references>
<references>
<ref name="term_40542"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/holman-bible-dictionary/habiru Habiru from Holman Bible Dictionary]</ref>
<ref name="term_40542"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/holman-bible-dictionary/habiru Habiru from Holman Bible Dictionary]</ref>
</references>
</references>

Latest revision as of 23:38, 12 October 2021

Habiru [1]

Identity of the Habiru Scholars have offered several theories attempting to identify these Habiru. Because the word sounds much like the name “Hebrew,” some scholars thought it referred to ethnic Israel. Since it appears in texts written earlier than Abraham lived and since the Habiru seemed numerous during the patriarchal period, it does not appear to designate ethnic Hebrews. Most scholars treat the term as the name of a social class: outcasts or renegades. In letters written from Palestine to Amarna in Egypt, they appear as rebels attacking cities belonging to the pharaohs of the fourteenth century, and in one text they are further identified as former slaves who had revolted.

Relation to Hebrews If the Habiru are rebels and not an ethnic group, are they nevertheless somehow related to the Hebrews? Some scholars have said yes, seeing the Habiru as nomads who might have included the patriarchs to Joshua, or as peasants who revolted. The Bible, however, depicts the patriarchs, not as nomads, but as pastoralists (shepherds who settled beside other shepherds and farmers). Neither was Joshua a nomad, nor do the books of Joshua and Judges depict a revolt by peasants. About the only possible relationship is that the Hebrews might have included some Habiru from Egypt or Canaan.

Paul Redditt

References