Difference between revisions of "Concomitant"
(Created page with "Concomitant <ref name="term_33809" /> <p> (1.) A term used by Roman theologians to denote the grace of God accompanying an action, as distinguished from prevenient grace,...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Webster's Dictionary <ref name="term_103299" /> == | |||
<p> (1.) A term used by [[Roman]] theologians to denote the grace of God accompanying an action, as distinguished from prevenient grace, which (against the Pelagians) is necessary to excite to good desires and actions (Bergier). </p> <p> (2.) Concomitance, in the Roman doctrine of the Lord's [[Supper]] (q. v ), means the "accompanying of the body of [[Christ]] by the blood, and of the blood by the body," in the Eucharist. Aquinas introduced the term (concomitantia). The withholding of the cup from the laity is justified by this Romanist doctrine of concomitance on the ground that as Christ is present entirely in each of the elements, he is received fully in either by the communicant. Of course this theory goes along with transubstantiation. — Burnet, On the Articles, art. 31; Smith's Hagenbach, History of Doctrines, § 195. (See [[Lords Supper]]). </p> | <p> (1): </p> <p> (a.) Accompanying; conjoined; attending. </p> <p> (2): </p> <p> (n.) One who, or that which, accompanies, or is collaterally connected with another; a companion; an associate; an accompaniment. </p> | ||
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_33809" /> == | |||
<p> (1.) A term used by [[Roman]] theologians to denote the grace of [[God]] accompanying an action, as distinguished from prevenient grace, which (against the Pelagians) is necessary to excite to good desires and actions (Bergier). </p> <p> (2.) Concomitance, in the Roman doctrine of the Lord's [[Supper]] (q. v ), means the "accompanying of the body of [[Christ]] by the blood, and of the blood by the body," in the Eucharist. Aquinas introduced the term (concomitantia). The withholding of the cup from the laity is justified by this [[Romanist]] doctrine of concomitance on the ground that as Christ is present entirely in each of the elements, he is received fully in either by the communicant. Of course this theory goes along with transubstantiation. — Burnet, On the Articles, art. 31; Smith's Hagenbach, History of Doctrines, § 195. (See [[Lords Supper]]). </p> | |||
==References == | ==References == | ||
<references> | <references> | ||
<ref name="term_103299"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/webster-s-dictionary/concomitant Concomitant from Webster's Dictionary]</ref> | |||
<ref name="term_33809"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/concomitant Concomitant from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | <ref name="term_33809"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/concomitant Concomitant from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
Revision as of 08:22, 12 October 2021
Webster's Dictionary [1]
(1):
(a.) Accompanying; conjoined; attending.
(2):
(n.) One who, or that which, accompanies, or is collaterally connected with another; a companion; an associate; an accompaniment.
Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [2]
(1.) A term used by Roman theologians to denote the grace of God accompanying an action, as distinguished from prevenient grace, which (against the Pelagians) is necessary to excite to good desires and actions (Bergier).
(2.) Concomitance, in the Roman doctrine of the Lord's Supper (q. v ), means the "accompanying of the body of Christ by the blood, and of the blood by the body," in the Eucharist. Aquinas introduced the term (concomitantia). The withholding of the cup from the laity is justified by this Romanist doctrine of concomitance on the ground that as Christ is present entirely in each of the elements, he is received fully in either by the communicant. Of course this theory goes along with transubstantiation. — Burnet, On the Articles, art. 31; Smith's Hagenbach, History of Doctrines, § 195. (See Lords Supper).
