Difference between revisions of "Liverpool Liturgy"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
(Created page with "Liverpool Liturgy <ref name="term_48566" /> <p> (See Liturgy). </p> ==References == <references> <ref name="term_48566"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-...")
 
Tag: Manual revert
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Liverpool Liturgy <ref name="term_48566" />  
== Charles Buck Theological Dictionary <ref name="term_20068" /> ==
<p> (See [[Liturgy]]). </p>
<p> A liturgy so called from its first publication at Liverpool. It was composed by some of the Presbyterians, who, growing weary of extempore prayer, thought a form more desirable. It made its appearance in 1752. Mr. Ortin says of it, "It is scarcely a [[Christian]] liturgy. In the collect the name of Christ is hardly mentioned; and the Spirit is quite banished from it." It was little better than a deistical composition. Orton's Letters, vol. 1: p. 80, 81. Bogue and Bennett's Hist. of Diss. vol. 3: p. 342. </p>
       
==References ==
==References ==
<references>
<references>
<ref name="term_48566"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/liverpool+liturgy Liverpool Liturgy from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref>
 
<ref name="term_20068"> [https://bibleportal.com/dictionary/charles-buck-theological-dictionary/liverpool+liturgy Liverpool Liturgy from Charles Buck Theological Dictionary]</ref>
       
</references>
</references>

Latest revision as of 10:14, 13 October 2021

Charles Buck Theological Dictionary [1]

A liturgy so called from its first publication at Liverpool. It was composed by some of the Presbyterians, who, growing weary of extempore prayer, thought a form more desirable. It made its appearance in 1752. Mr. Ortin says of it, "It is scarcely a Christian liturgy. In the collect the name of Christ is hardly mentioned; and the Spirit is quite banished from it." It was little better than a deistical composition. Orton's Letters, vol. 1: p. 80, 81. Bogue and Bennett's Hist. of Diss. vol. 3: p. 342.

References