Difference between revisions of "Smytonite Controversy"
From BiblePortal Wikipedia
(Created page with "Smytonite Controversy <ref name="term_61274" /> <p> was a dispute which arose in the Secession Kirk about the middle of the 18th century respecting the elevation of the eleme...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Smytonite Controversy <ref name="term_61274" /> | |||
<p> was a dispute which arose in the Secession Kirk about the middle of the 18th century respecting the elevation of the elements in celebrating the Lord's supper. One of the ministers of that body, Mr. Smyton, of Kilmaurs, considered such elevation an essential part of the ordinance, but the synod determined that it should be left an open question. </p> | Smytonite Controversy <ref name="term_61274" /> | ||
==References == | <p> was a dispute which arose in the Secession [[Kirk]] about the middle of the 18th century respecting the elevation of the elements in celebrating the Lord's supper. One of the ministers of that body, Mr. Smyton, of Kilmaurs, considered such elevation an essential part of the ordinance, but the synod determined that it should be left an open question. </p> | ||
== References == | |||
<references> | <references> | ||
<ref name="term_61274"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/smytonite+controversy Smytonite Controversy from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | <ref name="term_61274"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/smytonite+controversy Smytonite Controversy from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:10, 15 October 2021
Smytonite Controversy [1]
was a dispute which arose in the Secession Kirk about the middle of the 18th century respecting the elevation of the elements in celebrating the Lord's supper. One of the ministers of that body, Mr. Smyton, of Kilmaurs, considered such elevation an essential part of the ordinance, but the synod determined that it should be left an open question.
