Difference between revisions of "Michael Portier"
From BiblePortal Wikipedia
(Created page with "Michael Portier <ref name="term_56493" /> <p> an American Roman Catholic prelate, was born near the opening of our century, and was of French descent. He was educated...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Michael Portier <ref name="term_56493" /> | |||
<p> an American | Michael Portier <ref name="term_56493" /> | ||
==References == | <p> an American Roman [[Catholic]] prelate, was born near the opening of our century, and was of French descent. He was educated in this country and at the [[Propaganda]] at Rome, and was consecrated to the priesthood Nov. 5, 1826. After holding various ecclesiastical appointments, he was made bishop of Mobile. He died May 14, 1859. As an ecclesiastic he was greatly beloved by his own denomination, and as a citizen he was highly respected by all classes. He was more tolerant towards those who differed from him in religious belief than is apt to be the case among Romanists. </p> | ||
== References == | |||
<references> | <references> | ||
<ref name="term_56493"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/portier,+michael+d.d. Michael Portier from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | <ref name="term_56493"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/portier,+michael+d.d. Michael Portier from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:42, 15 October 2021
Michael Portier [1]
an American Roman Catholic prelate, was born near the opening of our century, and was of French descent. He was educated in this country and at the Propaganda at Rome, and was consecrated to the priesthood Nov. 5, 1826. After holding various ecclesiastical appointments, he was made bishop of Mobile. He died May 14, 1859. As an ecclesiastic he was greatly beloved by his own denomination, and as a citizen he was highly respected by all classes. He was more tolerant towards those who differed from him in religious belief than is apt to be the case among Romanists.
