Difference between revisions of "Aristo Of Pella"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
(Created page with "Aristo Of Pella <ref name="term_20919" /> <p> in Palestine, by birth a Jew, but converted to the true faith, flourished about 136. Mention is made by the author of the Chroni...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Aristo Of Pella <ref name="term_20919" />  
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_20919" /> ==
<p> in Palestine, by birth a Jew, but converted to the true faith, flourished about 136. Mention is made by the author of the Chronicle of [[Alexandria]] of [[Apelles]] and Aristo, who presented apologies to [[Hadrian]] and whom, he says, Eusebius, praises in his Ecclesiastical History; but nothing of the kind is to be found' in Eusebius, and Cave thinks it likely that he has confounded the names of [[Aristides]] and Aristo. However this may be, [[Aristo]] of [[Pella]] wrote a book, entitled A [[Disputation]] between [[Jason]] and Papiscus, so, at least, St. Maximus says. Whether this Jason was the same: Jason of [[Thessalonica]] ( Acts 17:5; Romans 16:21) is very doubtful. Papiscus was an [[Alexandrian]] Jew, who, as it appears, was convinced by the argument, and baptized. This Disputation for a long- time existed in Greek; and [[Origen]] entirely refuted the arguments of Celsus, who endeavored to bring it into contempt. .It is now -entirely lost, although some writers, (upon the strength of an expression used by Rigaltius, by which he appeared to' them to. quote from [[Nicolas]] Fabrus, when, in reality, he .quotes from Jerome) have imagined that it is still in existence, It- was translated into [[Latin]] by another Celsus, who lived before the time of Constantine. See -Cave, Hist. Lit. i, 39. </p>
<p> in Palestine, by birth a Jew, but converted to the true faith, flourished about 136. [[Mention]] is made by the author of the Chronicle of [[Alexandria]] of [[Apelles]] and Aristo, who presented apologies to [[Hadrian]] and whom, he says, Eusebius, praises in his [[Ecclesiastical]] History; but nothing of the kind is to be found' in Eusebius, and [[Cave]] thinks it likely that he has confounded the names of [[Aristides]] and Aristo. However this may be, [[Aristo]] of [[Pella]] wrote a book, entitled A [[Disputation]] between [[Jason]] and Papiscus, so, at least, St. Maximus says. Whether this Jason was the same: Jason of [[Thessalonica]] (&nbsp;Acts 17:5; &nbsp;Romans 16:21) is very doubtful. Papiscus was an [[Alexandrian]] Jew, who, as it appears, was convinced by the argument, and baptized. This Disputation for a long- time existed in Greek; and [[Origen]] entirely refuted the arguments of Celsus, who endeavored to bring it into contempt. .It is now -entirely lost, although some writers, (upon the strength of an expression used by Rigaltius, by which he appeared to' them to. quote from [[Nicolas]] Fabrus, when, in reality, he .quotes from Jerome) have imagined that it is still in existence, It- was translated into Latin by another Celsus, who lived before the time of Constantine. See -Cave, Hist. Lit. i, 39. </p>
       
==References ==
==References ==
<references>
<references>
<ref name="term_20919"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/aristo+of+pella Aristo Of Pella from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref>
<ref name="term_20919"> [https://bibleportal.com/encyclopedia/cyclopedia-of-biblical-theological-and-ecclesiastical-literature/aristo+of+pella Aristo Of Pella from Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature]</ref>
       
</references>
</references>

Latest revision as of 08:55, 15 October 2021

Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature [1]

in Palestine, by birth a Jew, but converted to the true faith, flourished about 136. Mention is made by the author of the Chronicle of Alexandria of Apelles and Aristo, who presented apologies to Hadrian and whom, he says, Eusebius, praises in his Ecclesiastical History; but nothing of the kind is to be found' in Eusebius, and Cave thinks it likely that he has confounded the names of Aristides and Aristo. However this may be, Aristo of Pella wrote a book, entitled A Disputation between Jason and Papiscus, so, at least, St. Maximus says. Whether this Jason was the same: Jason of Thessalonica ( Acts 17:5;  Romans 16:21) is very doubtful. Papiscus was an Alexandrian Jew, who, as it appears, was convinced by the argument, and baptized. This Disputation for a long- time existed in Greek; and Origen entirely refuted the arguments of Celsus, who endeavored to bring it into contempt. .It is now -entirely lost, although some writers, (upon the strength of an expression used by Rigaltius, by which he appeared to' them to. quote from Nicolas Fabrus, when, in reality, he .quotes from Jerome) have imagined that it is still in existence, It- was translated into Latin by another Celsus, who lived before the time of Constantine. See -Cave, Hist. Lit. i, 39.

References