Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "Theft"

From BiblePortal Wikipedia
59 bytes added ,  14:02, 14 October 2021
no edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Vine's Expository Dictionary of NT Words <ref name="term_79669" /> ==
== Vine's Expository Dictionary of NT Words <ref name="term_79669" /> ==
<div> '''1: κλοπή ''' (Strong'S #2829 — Noun [[Feminine]] — klope — klop-ay' ) </div> <p> akin to klepto, "to steal," is used in the plural in &nbsp;Matthew 15:19; &nbsp;Mark 7:22 . </p> <div> '''2: κλέμμα ''' (Strong'S #2809 — Noun Neuter — klemma — klem'-mah ) </div> <p> "a thing stolen," and so, "a theft," is used in the plural in &nbsp;Revelation 9:21 . In the Sept., &nbsp;Genesis 31:39; &nbsp;Exodus 22:3,4 . </p>
<div> '''1: '''''Κλοπή''''' ''' (Strong'S #2829 Noun [[Feminine]] klope klop-ay' ) </div> <p> akin to klepto, "to steal," is used in the plural in &nbsp;Matthew 15:19; &nbsp;Mark 7:22 . </p> <div> '''2: '''''Κλέμμα''''' ''' (Strong'S #2809 Noun Neuter klemma klem'-mah ) </div> <p> "a thing stolen," and so, "a theft," is used in the plural in &nbsp;Revelation 9:21 . In the Sept., &nbsp;Genesis 31:39; &nbsp;Exodus 22:3,4 . </p>
          
          
== Charles Buck Theological Dictionary <ref name="term_20596" /> ==
== Charles Buck Theological Dictionary <ref name="term_20596" /> ==
Line 27: Line 27:
          
          
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_63412" /> ==
== Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature <ref name="term_63412" /> ==
<p> (גְּנֵבָה, κλέμμα or κλοπή ) is treated in the Mosaic code in its widest bearings (&nbsp;Exodus 22:1 sq;), especially when accompanied by burglary or the abruption of animals (Josephus, ''Ant. 16'' :1, 1; Philo, ''Opp.'' 2, 336). If the stolen property had already been sold or rendered useless, the thief was required to make fivefold restitution in cases of horned cattle (comp. &nbsp;2 Samuel 12:6; Philo, Opp. 2, 337), or fourfold in case of sheep or goats; but only twofold in case the living animal was restored. But the statute likewise included the stealing of inanimate articles, as silver and gold (Josephus, Ant. 4:8,27). The prominence given to the former kind of theft is explainable on the ground of the pastoral character of the Hebrews (comp. Justin. 2:2; Walther, Gesch. d. rom. Rechts, p. 807; Sachs. Criminal Codex, art. 226; Marezoll, Criminal-Codex, p. 388). Any other kind of property might easily be found and recovered, and hence its theft was punished by its simple restoration, with a fifth part of the value added for loss of use (5:22 sq.; &nbsp;Leviticus 6:3 sq.). Rabbinical legislation on this point may be seen in the [[Mishna]] (Baba Metsiuh, 2). From &nbsp;Proverbs 6:30, Michaelis infers a sevenfold restitution in Solomon's time, but the passage probably speaks only in round numbers. On the ancient Greek laws, see Potter, ''Antiq.'' 1, 364 sq.; and on that of the twelve tables, Adam, ''Romans Antiq.'' 1, 426; Abegg, ''Strasfrechtswiss.'' p. 449; or generally Gellitus, 11:18; on that of the modern Arabs, see Wellsted, ''Travels,'' 1, 287; on the Talmudic, see Otho, ''Lex. Rabb.'' p. 253. The Rabbinical interpretations of the law are given in the Mishna, ''Baba Kamma,'' 7 sq. If the burglar suffered a fatal wound in the act by night, the act was regarded as a justifiable homicide (&nbsp;Exodus 22:2). So likewise in Solon's laws (Demosth. Timocr. p. 736) and among the ancient Romans (Heinecc. Antiq. Jur. Romans IV, 1, 3, 499), as well as Germans (Hanke, Gesch. d. deutsch. ''Peinl. Rechts,'' p. 99). [[Kidnapping]] (plagium) of a free [[Israelite]] was a capital crime (&nbsp;Exodus 21:16; &nbsp;Deuteronomy 24:7), punishable with strangulation (''Sanhedr. 11'' :1); and was an act to which a long line of defenseless sea-coast like [[Palestine]] was peculiarly liable from piracy. A similar penalty prevailed among the ancient [[Greeks]] (Xenoph. ''Memor.'' 1, 2, 62; Demosth. Philipp. p. 53) and Romans after [[Constantine]] (see Marezoll, Criminalrecht, p. 370; Reim, Criminalr. d. Romans p. 390); comp. Philo, Opp. 2, 338. See generally Michaelis, Mos. Recht, 6:66 sq., 83 sq. (See [[Steal]]). </p>
<p> ( '''''גְּנֵבָה''''' , '''''Κλέμμα''''' or '''''Κλοπή''''' ) is treated in the Mosaic code in its widest bearings (&nbsp;Exodus 22:1 sq;), especially when accompanied by burglary or the abruption of animals (Josephus, ''Ant. 16'' :1, 1; Philo, ''Opp.'' 2, 336). If the stolen property had already been sold or rendered useless, the thief was required to make fivefold restitution in cases of horned cattle (comp. &nbsp;2 Samuel 12:6; Philo, Opp. 2, 337), or fourfold in case of sheep or goats; but only twofold in case the living animal was restored. But the statute likewise included the stealing of inanimate articles, as silver and gold (Josephus, Ant. 4:8,27). The prominence given to the former kind of theft is explainable on the ground of the pastoral character of the Hebrews (comp. Justin. 2:2; Walther, Gesch. d. rom. Rechts, p. 807; Sachs. Criminal Codex, art. 226; Marezoll, Criminal-Codex, p. 388). Any other kind of property might easily be found and recovered, and hence its theft was punished by its simple restoration, with a fifth part of the value added for loss of use (5:22 sq.; &nbsp;Leviticus 6:3 sq.). Rabbinical legislation on this point may be seen in the [[Mishna]] (Baba Metsiuh, 2). From &nbsp;Proverbs 6:30, Michaelis infers a sevenfold restitution in Solomon's time, but the passage probably speaks only in round numbers. On the ancient Greek laws, see Potter, ''Antiq.'' 1, 364 sq.; and on that of the twelve tables, Adam, ''Romans Antiq.'' 1, 426; Abegg, ''Strasfrechtswiss.'' p. 449; or generally Gellitus, 11:18; on that of the modern Arabs, see Wellsted, ''Travels,'' 1, 287; on the Talmudic, see Otho, ''Lex. Rabb.'' p. 253. The Rabbinical interpretations of the law are given in the Mishna, ''Baba Kamma,'' 7 sq. If the burglar suffered a fatal wound in the act by night, the act was regarded as a justifiable homicide (&nbsp;Exodus 22:2). So likewise in Solon's laws (Demosth. Timocr. p. 736) and among the ancient Romans (Heinecc. Antiq. Jur. Romans IV, 1, 3, 499), as well as Germans (Hanke, Gesch. d. deutsch. ''Peinl. Rechts,'' p. 99). [[Kidnapping]] (plagium) of a free [[Israelite]] was a capital crime (&nbsp;Exodus 21:16; &nbsp;Deuteronomy 24:7), punishable with strangulation ( ''Sanhedr. 11'' :1); and was an act to which a long line of defenseless sea-coast like [[Palestine]] was peculiarly liable from piracy. A similar penalty prevailed among the ancient [[Greeks]] (Xenoph. ''Memor.'' 1, 2, 62; Demosth. Philipp. p. 53) and Romans after [[Constantine]] (see Marezoll, Criminalrecht, p. 370; Reim, Criminalr. d. Romans p. 390); comp. Philo, Opp. 2, 338. See generally Michaelis, Mos. Recht, 6:66 sq., 83 sq. (See [[Steal]]). </p>
          
          
==References ==
==References ==