Difference between revisions of "Bethsaida"

<p> This name signifies 'house of fish.' </p> <p> 1. [[Bethsaida Of Galilee]]  a town from whence came Philip, Andrew, and Peter, &nbsp;John 1:44; &nbsp;John 12:21; and against which the Lord pronounced a 'woe' because it had not repented at His mighty works. &nbsp;Matthew 11:21; &nbsp;Luke 10:13 . After the Lord had fed the 5,000 on the east of Jordan He sent His disciples to Bethsaida on the western shore. &nbsp;Mark 6:45 . It was near the shore on the west of the Sea of Galilee, in the same locality as Capernaum and Chorazin: there are ruins in the district, but its exact situation cannot be identified. </p> <p> 2. [[Bethsaida Julias]]  a town near the N.E. corner of the same lake. A blind man was cured there, &nbsp;Mark 8:22; and near to it the 5,000 were fed, &nbsp;Luke 9:10-17 : also related in &nbsp;Matthew 14:13-21; &nbsp;Mark 6:31-44; &nbsp;John 6:1-14 . It was called 'Julias,' because Philip the tetrarch enlarged the town, giving it the above name in honour of Julia, daughter of Augustus. It is identified by some with <i> et Tell, </i> 35 37' E 32 54' N . A few rude houses and heaps of stones are all that mark the spot. (The context of the above passages shows that the events recorded could not have taken place at or near the Bethsaida on the <i> west </i> of the lake.) </p>

<p> [[Bethsaida]] ( ''Bĕth'Sâ'I-Dah'' ), ''Home, Of Fishing.'' A city of Galilee, near Capernaum. &nbsp;John 12:21; &nbsp;Matthew 11:21. Some writers urge that there were two Bethsaidas, since the desert place where the 5000 were fed belonged to "the city called Bethsaida," &nbsp;Luke 9:10, while after the miracle the disciples were to go before him unto the other side to Bethsaida, &nbsp;Mark 6:45, which it is said could not refer to the same town. If there were two towns of this name, the first one was in Galilee on the west side of the lake, and 2. Bethsaida Julias, in Gaulanitis, on the eastern bank of the Jordan, near its entrance into the lake. Others think it unlikely that two cities in such close neighborhood should have borne the same name. Hence Dr. W. M. Thomson supposes that there was but one Bethsaida, which was built on both sides of the Jordan, and places the site at Abu-Zany, where the Jordan empties into the Lake of Galilee. The Sinaitic manuscript omits "belonging to a city called Bethsaida" in &nbsp;Luke 9:1-62; &nbsp;Luke 10:1-42; hence, Wilson agrees that there is no necessity for two Bethsaidas. The eastern city was beautified by Philip the tetrarch, and called Bethsaida Julias (in honor of a daughter of the emperor Augustus), perhaps to distinguish it from the western Bethsaida, in Galilee. </p>

<p> '''Bethsa'ida.''' ''(House Of Fish).'' [[Bethsaida]] , ''Of Galilee.'' &nbsp;John 12:21. A city which was the native place of Andrew, Peter and Philip, &nbsp;John 1:44; &nbsp;John 12:21, in the land of Gennesareth, &nbsp;Mark 6:46, compare &nbsp;Mark 6:53, and therefore, on the west side of the lake. By comparing the narratives in &nbsp;Mark 6:31-53 and &nbsp;Luke 9:10-17, it appears certain that the Bethsaida, at which the five thousand were fed, must have been a second place of the same name, on the east of the lake. </p> <p> (But, in reality, "there is, but one Bethsaida, that known on our maps as Bethsaida Julias." L. [[Abbot]] in Biblical and Oriental Journal. The fact is that Bethsaida was a village, on both sides of the Jordan, as it enters the sea of Galilee on the north, so that the western part of the village was in Galilee and the eastern portion in Gaulonitis, part of the tetrarchy of Philip. </p> <p> This eastern portion was built up into a beautiful city by Herod Philip, and named by him Bethsaida Julias, after Julia, the daughter of the Roman emperor, [[Tiberius]] Caesar. On the plain of Butaiha, a mile or two to the east, the five thousand were fed. The western part of the town remained a small village. - Editor). </p>

<li> A city near which Christ fed 5,000 (&nbsp;Luke 9:10; Compare &nbsp;John 6:17; &nbsp;Matthew 14:15-21 ), and where the blind man had his sight restored (&nbsp;Mark 8:22 ), on the east side of the lake, two miles up the Jordan. It stood within the region of Gaulonitis, and was enlarged by Philip the tetrarch, who called it "Julias," after the emperor's daughter. Or, as some have supposed, there may have been but one Bethsaida built on both sides of the lake, near where the Jordan enters it. Now the ruins et-Tel. <div> <p> '''Copyright Statement''' These dictionary topics are from M.G. Easton [[M.A., DD]]  Illustrated Bible Dictionary, Third Edition, published by [[Thomas]] Nelson, 1897. Public Domain. </p> <p> '''Bibliography Information''' Easton, Matthew George. Entry for 'Bethsaida'. Easton's Bible Dictionary. https://www.studylight.org/dictionaries/eng/ebd/b/bethsaida.html. 1897. </p> </div> </li>

<p> ( '''''Βηθσαϊδά''''' , for the Aramaean '''''צֵידָה''''' '''''בֵּית''''' , ''Fishing-Town,'' Buxtorf, ''Lex. Talm.'' col. 1894), a name which nearly all writers on Palestinian geography since Reland have assigned to two places, not far from each other, on the opposite shores near the head of Lake [[Tiberias]] (see Raumer, Paldstina, p. 109), but which there appears to be no good reason for distinguishing from each other (see Thomson, Land and Book, 2, 31 sq.). </p> <p> '''1.''' A town ( '''''Πόλις''''' , &nbsp;John 1:45) in Galilee (&nbsp;John 12:21), apparently on the western side of the sea of Tilcrias, being in "the land of Gennesareth" (q.v.), and yet toward the northern extremity of the lake (&nbsp;Mark 6:45). It was the native place of Peter, Andrew, and Philip, and the frequent resort of Jesus (&nbsp;John 1:44; &nbsp;John 12:21, etc.). It was evidently in near neighborhood to Capernaum and Chorazin (&nbsp;Matthew 11:21; &nbsp;Luke 10:13; and comp. &nbsp;Mark 6:45 with &nbsp;John 6:16), and, if the interpretation of the name is to be trusted, close to the water's edge. By Jerome ( ''Comm. In Esai.'' 9, 1) and [[Eusebius]] ( ''Onom.'' ) these towns and Tiberias are all mentioned together as lying on the shore of the lake. [[Epiphanius]] ( ''Adv. Haer.'' 2) says of Bethsaida and Capernaum that they were not far apart. Wilibald (A.D. 722) went from Magdalum to Capernaum, thence to Bethsaida, and then to Chorazin. These ancient notices, however, though they fix its general situation, none of them contain any indication of its. exact position, and as, like the other two towns just mentioned, its name and all memory of its site have perished, no positive identification can be made of it. It is true that Pococke (2, 99) finds Bethsaida at ''Irbid;'' Scetzen at ''Khan Minyeh'' (Zach's ''Montl. Corresp.'' 18, 248); Nau at ''Mejdel'' ( ''Voyage,'' p. 578; Quaresmius, 2:866), apparently between Khan Minyeh and Mejdel; and others at ''Tabighah'' (so Robinson) '''''—''''' all different points on the western shore of the lake. The [[Christians]] of [[Nazareth]] and Tiberias are indeed acquainted with the name, as well as that of Capernaum, from the New Testament; and they have learned to apply them to different places according to the opinions of their monastic teachers, or as may best suit their own convenience in answering the inquiries of travelers. It is thus that Dr. Robinson (Bibl. Researches, 3, 295) accounts for the fact that travelers have sometimes heard the names along the lake. Whenever this has not been the consequence of direct leading questions, which an [[Arab]] would always answer affirmatively, the names have doubtless been heard from the monks of Nazareth, or from the Arabs in a greater or less degree dependent upon them. The position of this Bethsaida mainly depends upon that of Capernaum, from which it was not far distant, to the north, on the shore (Robinson, new ed. of Researches, 3, 358, 359). If Capernaum be fixed at Khan Minyeh, then Bethsaida was probably at '''''‘''''' Ain el-Tabighah; but if (as on some accounts is more likely) Capernaum is to be located at '''''‘''''' Ain el-Mudawarah, then Bethsaida itself must be placed at Khan el- Minyeh; and in that case it may have sprung up as a restoration of the more ancient [[Cinnereth]] but nearer the shore. (See Capernaum). </p> <p> '''2.''' Christ fed the 5000 "near to a city called Bethsaida" (&nbsp;Luke 9:10); but, it has been thought from the parallel passages (&nbsp;Matthew 14:13; &nbsp;Mark 6:32-45) that this event took place, not in Galilee, but on the eastern side of the lake. This was held to be one of the greatest difficulties in sacred geography (Cellar. ''Notit. Orb.'' 2, 536) till the ingenious Reland seemed to have afforded materials for a satisfactory solution of it by distinguishing [[Two]] Bethsaidas, one on the western and the other on the north-eastern border of the lake ( ''Palaest.'' p. 653). The former was undoubtedly "the city of Andrew and Peter;" and, although Reland did not himself think that the other Bethsaida is mentioned in the New Testament, it has been thought by later writers to be more in agreement with the sacred text to conclude that it was the Bethsaida near which Christ fed the 5000, and also, probably, where the blind man was restored to sight. This appears also to have been the Bethsaida of Gaulonitis, afterward called Julias, which Pliny (Hist. Nat. 5, 15) places on the eastern side of the lake and of the Jordan, and which Josephus describes as situated in Lower Gaulonitis, just above the entrance of the Jordan into the lake (War, 2, 9, 1; 3, 10, 7). It was originally only a village, called Bethsaida ( '''''Βηθσαϊδά''''' ), but was rebuilt and enlarged by Philip the [[Tetrarch]] not long after the birth of Christ, and received the name of [[Julias]] in honor of Julia, the daughter of Augustus (Josephus, ''Ant.'' 18, 2, 1). Philip seems to have made it his occasional residence; and here he died, and was buried in a costly tomb ( ''Ant.'' 18, 4, 6). At the northern end of the lake of Gennesareth the mountains which form the eastern wall of the valley through which the Jordan enters the lake, throw out a spur or promontory which extends for some distance southward along the river. This is known by the people on the spot by no other name than et ''-Tell'' (the hill). On it are some ruins, which were visited by the Rev. [[Eli]] Smith, and proved to be the most extensive of any in the plain. The place is regarded as a sort of capital by the Arabs of the valley (the Ghawarineh), although they have lost its ancient name, and now occupy only a few houses in it as magazines. The ruins cover a large portion of the tell, but consist entirely of unhewn volcanic stones, without any distinct trace of ancient architecture (Robinson, Bibl. Researches, 3, 308). M. De Saulcy, however, objects to this location of Bethsaida, that in et-Tell there are only what may be called ruins of a barbarous age, and not such as would mark the remains of the splendid structures of Julias; that it is situated too far from the lake to be properly called a "fishing-town," and that this position is inconsistent with Josephus's account of his military operations against Sylla (Life, '''''§''''' 72). He therefore thinks that Bethsaida was located at Tell-Houm, formerly regarded as the site of Capernaum (Narrative, 2, 377). But this position is inconsistent with his own identification of other neighboring localities, and fails also to meet the requirements of the scriptural texts. </p> <p> Of this Bethsaida we have certainly one, and probably two mentions in the Gospels: </p> <p> '''(1.)''' That named above, of the feeding of the 5000 (&nbsp;Luke 9:10). The miracle took place in a '''''Τόπος''''' '''''Ἔρημος''''' '','' a vacant, lonely spot, somewhere, up in the rising ground at the back of the town, covered with a profusion of green grass (&nbsp;John 6:3; &nbsp;John 6:10; &nbsp;Mark 6:39; &nbsp;Matthew 14:19); and in the evening the disciples went down to the water and went home across the lake ( '''''Εἰς''''' '''''Τὸ''''' '''''Πέραν''''' ) to Bethsaida (&nbsp;Mark 6:45), or, as John (&nbsp;John 6:17) and Matthew (&nbsp;Matthew 14:34) more generally express it, toward Capernaum, and to the land of Gennesareth. The coincidence of the two Bethsaidas occurring in the one narrative, and that on the occasion of the only absolutely certain mention of the eastern one, is extraordinary. In the very ancient Syriac recension (the Nitrian) just published by Mr. Cureton, the words in &nbsp;Luke 9:10, "belonging to the city called Bethsaida" are omitted. </p> <p> '''(2.)''' The other, highly probable, mention of this place is in &nbsp;Mark 8:22, where it is called a "village" ( '''''Κώμη''''' ). If Dalmanutha (8, 10) or [[Magdala]] (&nbsp;Matthew 15:39) was on the west side of the lake, then was Bethsaida on the east, because in the interval Christ had departed by ship to the other side (&nbsp;Mark 8:13). And with this well accords the mention immediately after of the villages of [[Caesarea-Philippi]] (&nbsp;Mark 8:27), and of the "high mountain" of the transfiguration (9:2), which was not the traditional spot (Matthew Tabor), but a part of the Hermon range somewhere above the source of the Jordan. </p> <p> '''3.''' It is doubtful, however, whether, after all, there exists any real necessity for supposing two places of this name. As they could not have been very far from each other, the assumption is in itself a very improbable one, especially as the name nowhere occurs with any epithet or note of distinction, and neither Josephus nor any other ancient writer speaks of such a difference or duplication. In fact, all the circumstances under which every mention of the locality occurs, whether in [[Scripture]] or elsewhere, may be met by a location at the mouth of the Upper Jordan on the lake: </p> <p> '''(1.)''' This corresponds to the only definite mention of the spot by Josephus ( ''Ant.'' 18, 2, 1), as being "situate at Lake ( '''''Πρὸς''''' '''''Λίμνῃ''''' ) Gennesareth." </p> <p> '''(2.)''' This would be popularly called a part of Galilee (&nbsp;John 12:21). and yet might very easily be reckoned as belonging to Lower Gaulonitis (Joseph. ''War,'' 2, 9, 1), since it was really on the border between these two districts. </p> <p> '''(3.)''' It would thus lie directly on the route from the western shore of the lake to Caesarea-Philippi (&nbsp;Mark 8:22, comp. with 10 and 27). </p> <p> '''(4.)''' Such a position readily reconciles the statements in the accounts of Christ recrossing the lake after both miracles of the loaves: </p> <p> [1.] In &nbsp;Mark 6:32 (comp. &nbsp;John 6:1), the passage was directly across the northern end of the lake from Capernaum to a retired spot on the shore somewhat S.E. of Bethsaida; thence the disciples started to cross merely the N.E. [[Corner]] of the lake to Bethsaida itself (&nbsp;Mark 6:45, but were driven by the head-wind during the night to a more southerly point, and thus reached Capernaum (&nbsp;John 6:17; &nbsp;John 6:21; &nbsp;John 6:24), after having traversed the plain of Gennesareth (&nbsp;Matthew 14:34; &nbsp;Mark 6:53). </p> <p> [2.] In &nbsp;Mark 8:10, the passage was likewise directly across the upper portion of the lake, but in an opposite direction, from the [[Decapolis]] (&nbsp;Mark 8:31) to the vicinity of Magdala (&nbsp;Matthew 15:39), thence along the shore and around the N.W. head of the lake to Bethsaida (&nbsp;Mark 8:22), and so on northward to the scene of the transfiguration in the region of Caesarea-Philippi (&nbsp;Matthew 16:13). </p> <p> [3.] The position of et-Tell is too far from the shore to correspond with the notices of Bethsaida and Livias, which require a situation corresponding to that of the modern ruined village el-Araj, containing some vestiges of antiquity (Robinson, Researches, 3, 304), immediately east of the debouchure of the Upper Jordan. (See Forbiger, Situs desertorum Bethsaidae, Lips. 1742). </p> <p> If Capernaum be located at Khan Minyeh or Ain Tabighah, or anywhere in that immediate vicinity, Bethsaida may very well have been situated at Tell Hum; and this position will obviate the necessity for the supposition of two Bethsaidas, inasmuch as this was the last important town in that direction, and the entire shore of the lake beyond, even on the north-east side, may very well be designated as belonging to it (&nbsp;Luke 9:10). (See Capernaum). </p>

<p> ''''' beth ''''' - ''''' sā´i ''''' - ''''' da ''''' ( Βηθσαΐδά , <i> ''''' Bēthsaidá ''''' </i> , "house of fishing"): </p> <p> (1) A city East of the Jordan, in a "desert place" (that is, uncultivated ground used for grazing) at which Jesus miraculously fed the multitude with five loaves and two fishes (&nbsp;Mark 6:32; &nbsp;Luke 9:10 ). This is doubtless to be identified with the village of Bethsaida in Lower Gaulonitis which the Tetrarch Philip raised to the rank of a city, and called Julias, in honor of Julia, the daughter of Augustus. It lay near the place where the Jordan enters the Sea of Gennesaret ( <i> Ant. </i> , Xviii , ii, 1; <i> BJ </i> , II, ix, 1; III, x, 7; <i> Vita </i> , 72). This city may be located at <i> ''''' et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Tell ''''' </i> , a ruined site on the East side of the Jordan on rising ground, fully a mile from the sea. As this is too far from the sea for a fishing village, Schumacher (The <i> ''''' Jaulān ''''' </i> , 246) suggests that <i> ''''' el ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' ‛Araj ''''' </i> , "a large, completely destroyed site close to the lake," connected in ancient times with <i> ''''' et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Tell ''''' </i> "by the beautiful roads still visible," may have been the fishing village, and <i> ''''' et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Tell ''''' </i> the princely residence. He is however inclined to favor <i> ''''' el ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Mes‛adı̄yeh ''''' </i> , a ruin and winter village of <i> ''''' Arab et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Tellawı̄yeh ''''' </i> , which stands on an artificial mound, about a mile and a half from the mouth of the Jordan. It should be noted, however, that the name is in origin radically different from Bethsaida. The substitution of <i> ''''' sin ''''' </i> for <i> ''''' cad ''''' </i> is easy: but the insertion of the guttural <i> ''''' ‛ain ''''' </i> is impossible. No trace of the name Bethsaida has been found in the district; but any one of the sites named would meet the requirements. </p> <p> To this neighborhood Jesus retired by boat with His disciples to rest awhile. The multitude following on foot along the northern shore of the lake would cross the Jordan by the ford at its mouth which is used by foot travelers to this day. The "desert" of the narrative is just the <i> ''''' barrı̄yeh ''''' </i> of the Arabs where the animals are driven out for pasture. The "green grass" of &nbsp;Mark 6:39 , and the "much grass" of &nbsp;John 6:10 , point to some place in the plain of <i> ''''' el ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Baṭeiḥah ''''' </i> , on the rich soil of which the grass is green and plentiful compared with the scanty herbage on the higher slopes. </p> <p> (2) Bethsaida of Galilee, where dwelt Philip, Andrew, Peter (&nbsp;John 1:44; &nbsp;John 12:21 ), and perhaps also James and John. The house of Andrew and Peter seems to have been not far from the synagogue in Capernaum (&nbsp;Matthew 8:14; &nbsp;Mark 1:29 , etc.). Unless they had moved their residence from Bethsaida to Capernaum, of which there is no record, and which for fishermen was unlikely, Bethsaida must have lain close to Capernaum. It may have been the fishing town adjoining the larger city. As in the case of the other Bethsaida, no name has been recovered to guide us to the site. On the rocky promontory, however, East of <i> ''''' Khān Minyeh ''''' </i> we find <i> ''''' [[Sheikh]] ‛Aly eṣ ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Ṣaiyādı̄n ''''' </i> , "Sheikh Aly of the Fishermen," as the name of a ruined <i> ''''' weley ''''' </i> , in which the second element in the name Bethsaida is represented. Near by is the site at <i> ''''' ‛Ain et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Ṭābigha ''''' </i> , which many have identified with Bethsaida of Galilee. The warm water from copious springs runs into a little bay of the sea in which fishes congregate in great numbers. This has therefore always been a favorite haunt of fishermen. If Capernaum were at <i> ''''' Khān Minyeh ''''' </i> , then the two lay close together. The names of many ancient places have been lost, and others have strayed from their original localities. The absence of any name resembling Bethsaida need not concern us. </p> <p> Many scholars maintain that all the New [[Testament]] references to Bethsaida apply to one place, namely, Bethsaida Julias. The arguments for and against this view may be summarized as follows: </p> <p> ( <i> a </i> ) Galilee ran right round the lake, including most of the level coastland on the East. Thus Gamala, on the eastern shore, was within the jurisdiction of Josephus, who commanded in Galilee ( <i> BJ </i> , II, xx, 4). Judas of Gamala ( <i> Ant. </i> , Xviii , i, l) is also called Judas of Galilee (ibid., i, 6). If Gamala, far down the eastern shore of the sea, were in Galilee, <i> a fortiori </i> Bethsaida, a town which lay on the very edge of the Jordan, may be described as in Galilee. </p> <p> But Josephus makes it plain that Gamala, while added to his jurisdiction, was not in Galilee, but in Gaulonitis ( <i> BJ </i> , II, xx, 6). Even if Judas were born in Gamala, and so might properly be called a Gaulonite, he may, like others, have come to be known as belonging to the province in which his active life was spent. "Jesus of Nazareth" was born in Bethlehem. Then Josephus explicitly says that Bethsaida was in Lower Gaulonitis ( <i> BJ </i> , II, ix, 1). Further, Luke places the country of the [[Gerasenes]] on the other side of the sea from Galilee (&nbsp;Luke 8:26 ) - <i> ''''' antı́pera tḗs Galilaias ''''' </i> ("over against Galilee"). </p> <p> ( <i> b </i> ) To go to the other side - <i> ''''' eis tó péran ''''' </i> (&nbsp;Mark 6:45 ) - does not of necessity imply passing from the East to the West coast of the lake, since Josephus uses the verb <i> ''''' diaperaióō ''''' </i> of a passage from Tiberias to Tarichea ( <i> Vita </i> , 59). But ( <i> i </i> ) this involved a passage from a point on the West to a point on the South shore, "crossing over" two considerable bays; whereas if the boat started from any point in <i> ''''' el ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Baṭeiḥah ''''' </i> , to which we seem to be limited by the "much grass," and by the definition of the district as belonging to Bethsaida, to sail to <i> ''''' et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Tell ''''' </i> , it was a matter of coasting not more than a couple of miles, with no bay to cross. ( <i> ii </i> ) No case can be cited where the phrase <i> ''''' eis to peran ''''' </i> certainly means anything else than "to the other side." ( <i> iii </i> ) Mark says that the boat started to go unto the other side to Bethsaida, while John, gives the direction "over the sea unto Capernaum" (&nbsp;Mark 6:17 ). The two towns were therefore practically in the same line. Now there is no question that Capernaum was on "the other side," nor is there any suggestion that the boat was driven out of its course; and it is quite obvious that, sailing toward Capernaum, whether at <i> ''''' Tell Ḥūm ''''' </i> or at <i> ''''' Khān Minyeh ''''' </i> , it would never reach Bethsaida Julius. ( <i> iv </i> ) The present writer is familiar with these waters in both storm and calm. If the boat was taken from any point in <i> ''''' el ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Baṭeiḥah ''''' </i> towards <i> ''''' et ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Tell ''''' </i> , no east wind would have distressed the rowers, protected as that part is by the mountains. Therefore it was no contrary wind that carried them toward Capernaum and the "land of Gennesaret." On the other hand, with a wind from the West, such as is often experienced, eight or nine hours might easily be occupied in covering the four or five miles from <i> ''''' el ''''' </i> - <i> ''''' Baṭeiḥah ''''' </i> to the neighborhood of Capernaum. </p> <p> ( <i> c </i> ) The words of Mark (&nbsp;Mark 6:45 ), it is suggested (Sanday, <i> Sacred Sites of the Gospels </i> , 42), have been too strictly interpreted: as the Gospel was written probably at Rome, its author being a native, not of Galilee, but of Jerusalem. Want of precision on topographical points, therefore, need not surprise us. But as we have seen above, the "want of precision" must also be attributed to the writer of &nbsp;John 6:17 . The agreement of these two favors the strict interpretation. Further, if the Gospel of Mark embodies the recollections of Peter, it would be difficult to find a more reliable authority for topographical details connected with the sea on which his fisher life was spent. </p> <p> ( <i> d </i> ) In support of the single-city theory it is further argued that ( <i> i </i> ) Jesus withdrew to Bethsaida as being in the jurisdiction of Philip, when he heard of the murder of John by Antipas, and would not have sought again the territories of the latter so soon after leaving them. ( <i> ii </i> ) Medieval works of travel notice only one Bethsaida. ( <i> iii </i> ) The East coast of the sea was definitely attached to Galilee in ad 84, and [[Ptolemy]] (circa 140) places [[Julius]] in Galilee. It is therefore significant that only the Fourth Gospel speaks of "Bethsaida of Galilee." ( <i> iv </i> ) There could hardly have been two Bethsaidas so close together. </p> <p> But: ( <i> i </i> ) It is not said that Jesus came hither that he might leave the territory of [[Antipas]] for that of Philip; and in view of &nbsp;Mark 6:30 , and &nbsp;Luke 9:10 , the inference from &nbsp;Matthew 14:13 that he did so, is not warranted. ( <i> ii </i> ) The Bethsaida of medieval writers was evidently on the West of the Jordan. If it lay on the East it is inconceivable that none of them should have mentioned the river in this connection. ( <i> iii </i> ) If the 4th Gospel was not written until well into the 2nd century, then the apostle was not the author; but this is a very precarious assumption. John, writing after 84 ad, would hardly have used the phrase "Bethsaida of Galilee" of a place only recently attached to that province, writing, as he was, at a distance from the scene, and recalling the former familiar conditions. ( <i> iv </i> ) In view of the frequent repetition of names in [[Palestine]] the nearness of the two Bethsaidas raises no difficulty. The abundance of fish at each place furnished a good reason for the recurrence of the name. </p>